AnswerID: 65967 Submitted: Thursday, Jul 01, 2004 at 15:44
biscuits
replied:
Well I guess you are limited size wise with the rangies to a 4cyl diesel or V6/V8 engine. The stock rover 3.9L is adequate so if it isnt broke I wouldnt change it. Dunno if any of my info will help much but here goes anyway: Other common engines to consider:
HECS 253 (4.2L) V8 - not much power, but cheap to buy, easy to work on, plenty of cheap parts, thirsty. I wouldnt bother. Driven this in a FJ40 ute - I thought it was gutless but obviously better than the stock donk. Old motor now.
HECS 308 (5.0) V8 - Depending on what model 308 you get, good overall motor, plenty of power in later ones, downside is petrol. Havent driven one of these before.
CHEV 307 / 350 (5.0, 5.7L) - A mate of mine had a 350ci in his 1973 range rover - TRUELY AWESOME offroad. The huge low down torque coupled with the explosive power of a V8 was outstanding and made offroad work an absolute joy. Was on dedicated LPG at the time. Had a problem with an mysterious oil leak that was the reason for its sale in the end. Rough like a V8 on idle, sounded like a true throaty V8 too... not for some but i thought it was great :) The 307 & 350 ci ive driven in a MQ SWB was better than the tired one we had in the RR.
Buick / Commodore 3.8L V6 - Why bother? expensive for a late model one, minimal power gains on the stock 3.9L rover V8. Could always go supercharged but expensive to buy and thirsty as with most.
Diesels: ZD30 is expensive, as are most the other diesels to rebuild or buy. Good low down torque but you lose that explosive power of a V8 which sometimes can be very helpful offroad. I drive a turbo diesel myself but I wouldnt put one in the RR. Drove the stock RR turbo diesel once - didnt like its rattly sound one bit! Power was okay but nothing special.
Dunno if this helps any, but thought id have a go anyway
Cheers,
Dave.
Reply 1 of 9