AnswerID: 71150 Submitted: Tuesday, Aug 03, 2004 at 21:39
Member - Captain (WA)
replied:
The 4 cyl 2.7 RV did not have a sub tank, but it was permanent 4WD. However, the 6 cycl 3.4 RV did have the sub tank.
Some test writers liked the 2.7 while others reckoned it needed more power. My brother has the 3.4RV and it goes very well and gets reasonable economy (~11L/100kms) freeway city running, not sure about the 2.7 but assume it would get marginally better.
Cheers
Captain
 Click Image to Enlarge |
| Its not what you drive, but how you drive it!
|
Reply 1 of 3