FollowupID: 5014 Submitted:
Friday, Dec 13, 2002 at 00:00
Rick posted:
Moggs,
I was aware of the cracking tower issues with Poly Airs. The No Bull works on the chassis directly, and so can't crack a peripheral piece of architecture. I spoke to the developer/owner at a 4WD show, and he showed me pics of his GU with standard
suspension fitted with No Bulls, and some of the roads he had travelled - his vehicle and weight stats were near identical to mine when fully loaded (3.2 t).
I also liked the fact that when unladen (most of the time in the city) a stiff
suspension was not attemting to work. The No Bull will only be utilised when hard cornering/body roll is enacted, or when heavily loaded. Besides, why not try soemthing a bit different. I had been impressed that the Hema mapping vehicle (which I saw in
Darwin recently) uses the No Bull. They carry more weight and do more
miles than I, and they liked the system.
I also was attracted to the fitment ease and the therefore cheaper price of installation.
Another factor is that I did not actually want increased height; rather just increased load carrying capacity.
Hope this helps
Rick.