<span class="highlight">GPS</span> vs Speedo

Submitted: Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 16:02
ThreadID: 53040 Views:5136 Replies:15 FollowUps:30
This Thread has been Archived
On the trip from home to Toowoomba and back we noticed that the speedo is out compared to the GPS (is gps said that we did 2600km and the speedo 2200km)

is this normal?

Also noticed that with the 5km length odo checkers on the highways it was sometimes out 300m and sometimes 100m....is doing less km.....

Advice please!!

Laura
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Troll 81 (QLD) - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 16:10

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 16:10
Laura

The GPS will be correct. Have you fitted larger tyres? if so your Speedo reading will be out and you need to get it adjusted
AnswerID: 279371

Follow Up By: Kiwi & "Mahindra" - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 16:13

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 16:13
nope, standard tyres

0
FollowupID: 543517

Reply By: Truckster (Vic) - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 16:13

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 16:13
quite common these days for speedo's to be out by "Acceptable levels" according to the dealer, which doesnt help when you get fined.

I drive by GPS now, dont even look at the speedo.

Take your car back to dealer and complain, but they will only test it to say "Its within acceptable levels", in otherwords - go away.
AnswerID: 279372

Follow Up By: Kiwi & "Mahindra" - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 16:16

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 16:16
when we looked at the speed it was the same, it was the odo that was out....maybe I should have wrote gps vs odo .....???? I dunno....either way its an advantage....will do more km than its saying

Laura
0
FollowupID: 543518

Follow Up By: disco1942 - Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 01:07

Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 01:07
I don't know what is going on. I note you have a Navara. They are notorious for having speedos that read 10km/H fast. Mine reads 10km/H fast at speeds from 90 - 110 compared with the GPS. Complained as it is a new truck and they said any replacement speedo will read the same.

PeterD
PeterD
Retired radio and electronics technician

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 543827

Reply By: Grungle - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 16:18

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 16:18
Yes that would be correct. Vehicle speedo will always be out by around 5% for standard tyres to 10% or higher for larger tyres.

Standard cars will have an actual speed lower than indicated (ie 95km/hr actual, 100km/hr indicated). Modified cars (bigger tyres)will most likely be opposite.

We always use the GPS as a trip computer due to accuracy but I have also match the diff ratios to my tyres so am out by less than 1km/hr @ 100km/hr on the speedo / ODO.

The only thing I can see that isn't quite right would be the GPS would show a shorter distance travelled than the ODO unless you had 35" tyres on.

Regards
David
AnswerID: 279373

Reply By: Gerhardp1 - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 16:19

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 16:19
The GPS will also measure when you go backwards. Did you go backwards for 400km? :)

I'd tend to trust the GPS - you can also tell if you tend to be flying past the bulk of the traffic, pointing to a speedo and odo reading less than you are actually doing.

There is also a possibility that the odo is out of step with the speedo, this would probably not be common since most use the same pulse for both. You would suspect this if your speedo and the GPS speed are reading the same.

AnswerID: 279374

Reply By: pprass - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 16:41

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 16:41
We have found over the past 4 years using a GPS that they are deadly accurate in measuring your speed. However regarding distance travelled - especially long distances there seems to be a problem there. This issue has been discussed at length on GPS forums such as Magellan with no clear understanding as to why it happens. You would think that a deadly accurate speed reading would equate to a deadly accurate distance measurement - but we figure wrong!
AnswerID: 279379

Follow Up By: Grungle - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 17:07

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 17:07
Could be drift due to accuracy of GPS constantly changing. Your position is constantly changing on a GPS - albeit only meters but if it is cloudy with patchy rain then accuracy can be reduced and your position can vary up to 40m or even 100m. This constant changing can be seen as movement of the vehicle and thus added to the overall trip distance.

Just a thought.

Regards
David

0
FollowupID: 543522

Reply By: Member - Mike DID - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 17:05

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 17:05
When the GPS loses satellite lock you suddenly see your track jump off several kms in some random direction, and then jump back - that gets added to your distance travelled.
AnswerID: 279388

Reply By: Member - Doug T (FNQ) - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 17:09

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 17:09
Laura
Trust your GPS. When I was doing Pilot/Escort work I always charged the Klm rate by the GPS Reading , If i had used the Odometer I would have been losing dollars.

.
gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 279390

Follow Up By: wigger - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 19:34

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 19:34
Doug, since you are familiar with Garmin navigators, have you noticed on the trip data screen, top R H corner, the distance to travel fgure (at the start of a trip) is actually an ' as the crow flies'
figure. e.g. M.bah to Sydney is given as 645kms but actual is 821.
As you drive along, the navigator takes into account all the twists and turns in the road so the distance travelled plus kms still to travel, keeps increasing on the 645 and at Sydney it's become 821.
Since the navigator is actually aggregating millions of point to point readings over this sort of distance( the analogy being a jagged straight line graph as opposed to a flowing curve,) isn't there always going to be a difference between any odo reading and a navigator total?
0
FollowupID: 543578

Follow Up By: Member - Doug T (FNQ) - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 20:49

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 20:49
wigger
Depends on how you have yours set up, If I set mine from my place to Brisbane it shows 1580klm and that's what it will be, yes some units do show both, and there are no zig zags, the route follows exactly along the hwy unless there has been a section of new road, i.e Mt Isa to Camooweal near Inca creek and Johnson Creek, I use a Nuvi 660 and a Quest, both read the same.

.
gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 543602

Follow Up By: wigger - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 21:05

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 21:05
Doug, I was rong. Had a look again in the trip data window and it does show the actual distance. It's out on the 'favourites' list that it shows it as a 'crow flies' fig (645kms)
0
FollowupID: 543610

Follow Up By: Member - Doug T (FNQ) - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 21:08

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 21:08
wigger
Phew that was close, I was setting up the rope over the tree for a Lynching'


.
gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 543612

Follow Up By: wigger - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 21:19

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 21:19
Doug, I was rong. Had a look again in the trip data window and it does show the actual distance. It's out on the 'favourites' list that it shows it as a 'crow flies' fig (645kms).
I was going to get a 660 but the 510 I have is so good that it hardly seems warranted. Never loses the sattelite, never does 100kms while in the garage overnight. Too many people buying at Aldi i think.
0
FollowupID: 543614

Follow Up By: Member - Doug T (FNQ) - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 21:23

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 21:23
wigger
Your on the right track when it comes to GPS , Don't panic, I put the rope away.

.
gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 543616

Follow Up By: Member - Toolman (VIC) - Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:08

Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:08
Hi all, just another angle to this topic,
The GPS does not take into account the hills and valleys (slope distances) and calculates on horizontal distance. Therefore generally, the distance on the GPS should show less than your speedo in hilly country and be closer on the flats because the data its working with is only 2 dimensional. Once we start getting 3d mapping data into popularly available GPS systems it will improve the accuracy. Paper maps do the same thing they only show the horizontal distances not the slope distances.
Toolman
0
FollowupID: 543686

Follow Up By: Member - Doug T (FNQ) - Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:20

Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:20
Toolman
Just one answer covers your statement
YOU ARE WRONG
gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 543698

Follow Up By: Brian Purdue - Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 14:34

Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 14:34
Toolman is correct. Read "GPS Vehicle navigation in Australia by Robert Pepper".
It even has pictures in it.
Brian Purdue
0
FollowupID: 543719

Follow Up By: Member - Doug T (FNQ) - Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 14:54

Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 14:54
Brian
I won't be mean to you but quite honestly I don't give a Rats Ar$e what Mr Pepper wrote about this particular issue, on the other hand his book would probably be a good read even if not 100% correct,
So let me explain ( and as I have said before my statements are based on my own experiences in real time )...When travelling on the highways I see a Klm post, just south of Miriam Vale reading Gin Gin 98, I set the gps trip to zero and when I have traversed all the corners and hills , ups and downs the gps reads I have done 98 , now if you want to believe some book writer then that's your choice but don't try and tell me I'm wrong when I have done this test many times all over the country, ...or could the surveyers be wrong eh...I doubt it.



gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 543720

Follow Up By: Member - Toolman (VIC) - Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 18:09

Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 18:09
Doug,
Ignorance and a closed mind must be bliss. If you set your self up as an "authority" on this stuff and are prepared to boldly declare I'm wrong then you should at least understand the fundamentals. And by the way I am one of those surveyor types.
Toolman
0
FollowupID: 543757

Follow Up By: wigger - Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 18:18

Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 18:18
Doug, are youi saying that the GPS measurement across hilly terrain takes this into account because like the curvy road measurement, it is taking thousands of fixes as you cross and aggegating the distances between them. i.e. it is simply the multitude of readings that produces the accuracy (approximating the tyre distance).
When you go to 'favourites' and it gives the distance to that point, is the unit simply taking the difference between the fix it has taken at the point you're currently at, and the destination. Because this is only a two point measurement, it treats it as a'crow flies' distance, and is quite different from the tyre mileage.
0
FollowupID: 543948

Follow Up By: wigger - Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 18:23

Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 18:23
Toolman, I'm rather intrigued by this debate and think it might need 'mythbusters' to do a bit of work on it.
Are you saying that if you set off very fast from the bottom of Pikes Peak, that the tyre distance would be significantly greater than the GPS figure because the unit would not have factored in the 'slope' travel and would have treated it as horizontal travel?
0
FollowupID: 543951

Follow Up By: Brian Purdue - Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 19:10

Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 19:10
Bingo! Wigger. GPS measures the DISTANCE covered from point to point. It does not measure hills or gullies. Yes, Doug, you are right, the GPS measures the height of the slopes you traverse.
To the sattelite X number of miles or kilometres in the sky the earth appears as smooth as a golf ball. Have a look at the moon Doug, the surface, to the naked eye appears smooth, the same applies to the earth. Think about it. Mt. Everest is 29,002 high the earth is how big? On the scale of things Everest is a mere pimple.
Wigger, if it were possible to drive 50 miles (kilometrres) vertically the gps would show you are still in the same place. You are correct and our learned friend Doug is wrong.
0
FollowupID: 543960

Follow Up By: wigger - Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 20:27

Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 20:27
Ok Brian,
You say GPS measures the distance from point to point. We all agree on that but the essential thing in the end is that because the satelitte fixes are so frequent, as I understand it every 2 or 3 secs, that the distance travelled becomes millions of little straight lines whose distance is agggregated, so therefore the wiggles in the road or the incline is not so significant.Therefore umdulations or curves become less important than if the fixes were taken at 30 sec intervals.
Forget the 50 mile vertical drive.(I accept the conclusion) What about the Pikes Peak scenario where i would say the two measured distances would be similar, despite the inclination.I may have to google to get the height and climb times to give the metres per sec, to work out the average gradient.

0
FollowupID: 543983

Follow Up By: Member - Doug T (FNQ) - Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 21:06

Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 21:06
Wigger/Toolman/Brian

gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 543997

Follow Up By: wigger - Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 21:35

Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 21:35
Doug, there's no need to be condescending.
If at the start of 'Mythbusters', Adam and Jamie said "bull bleep " and refused to take part what other people contended, we'd have a very short programme indeed.
There is a site http://www.lada.co.uk/ which I still look at (yes' I had a Lada once) Why? because i like the good natured bantering, something that this forum is not overendowed with.
Sometimes it gets into the Holden v Ford mindset. Look at the second post -' Bearded kitten goes to Africa" and you might see what I mean.
Anyway, where's my christmas card?
0
FollowupID: 544004

Follow Up By: Member - Doug T (FNQ) - Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 22:39

Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 22:39
Wigger
Sorry I forgot so here ...yake your pick for xmas 2008



.
gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 544016

Follow Up By: Member - Toolman (VIC) - Saturday, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:54

Saturday, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:54
Wigger,
Brian is correct in what he has written. I don't want to get into the science of mapping, geodesy and GPS but it is a very complex process that's at work in the background to give us the information we see on our GPS screens. You might wish to visit the GA web (www.ga.gov.au) if you are really interested.
Toolman
0
FollowupID: 544055

Follow Up By: The Explorer - Sunday, Jan 13, 2008 at 11:39

Sunday, Jan 13, 2008 at 11:39
Good luck getting some people on this forum to admit they are wrong. Fact (not opinion) of the matter is that slope is NOT taken into account when measuring distance travelled with a GPS. So in hilly country you will get an under-estimation of distance travelled.

To put it simply..cut from another forum:

"I have talked with the rep at Garmin and he states that: There are NO GARMIN products, at the present time, that can give ACCURATE distances with any significant changes in elevation. He gave as an example, in a 1 mile distance with a 10 degree change in elevation, there will be a shortfall of 150 feet. GARMIN products are only a 2 dimensional device (with respect measuring distance).... The best way to get an accurate measurement in distance is the use of a mileage wheel."

Note: applies to all makes not just Garmin.

Cheers
Greg
I sent one final shout after him to stick to the track, to which he replied “All right,” That was the last ever seen of Gibson - E Giles 23 April 1874

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message
Moderator

0
FollowupID: 545704

Follow Up By: Brian Purdue - Sunday, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:11

Sunday, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:11
BINGO!
Brian
0
FollowupID: 545714

Reply By: Member - Alan H (Narangba QLD - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 19:29

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 19:29
GPS is only accurate when travelling in a straight line.
It is showing the speed of displacement of the receiver therefore if you take a large curve, the receiver is being displaced in a straight line (short cutting the corner) and the speed shown will be slower than around the circumference of the bend.

Odometer readings are recording distance. The GPS does this by again measuring the displacement of the reciever at fixed intervals and again will be be in effect a series of very short straight lines. The GPS distance is therefore less than the rolling distance done by the tyres.

The GPS is also not pinpoint accurate (say about 3-5 metres) and uses averaging to give your location. On a long trip this small distance error caused by the averaging can all add up to a large amount if used for distance measuring.
AnswerID: 279422

Follow Up By: wigger - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 19:37

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 19:37
Alan I wus a stoopid boy. Should have read your post first. The point we are dicussing is the same.
0
FollowupID: 543580

Reply By: Member - Captain (WA) - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 19:31

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 19:31
Hi Laura,

I have had my GPS clock up over 100kms overnight while parked in my garage!!!

As others have said above, when the GPS loses "lock" on the satalites your position can end up anywhere. My garage windows allow satelite signal most of the time but occasionally it loses lock depending on the satelite location.

Out of cursoity I downloaded my tracklog from my GPS from an overnight "trip" and found while I was mostly stationary, I could suddenly end up metres to kilometres away from home, but only for an instant.

So, trust your km/hr reading for speed but overall the GPS odometer may not be that accurate.

Cheers

Captain
AnswerID: 279425

Reply By: Member - Duncs - Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 21:33

Wednesday, Jan 02, 2008 at 21:33
Kiwi,

You are comparing the distances measured by the various devices.

Some others are comparing distance travelled to actual distance. I am wondering where the actual distance measurement comes from.

I was speaking to a cartographer a few years back who was busy re-measureing distances on his maps using a GPS. He told me that many distances were proving to be considerably different to those shown on the old maps. He claimed that a small SW Queensland town was in fact about 200km away from it's location as marked on the maps.

If we are measuring distances based on traditional maps and mesurement methods then it could be that the GPS is spot on and the 'actual distance' as we know it is wrong.

Duncs
AnswerID: 279451

Follow Up By: Member - Toolman (VIC) - Saturday, Jan 05, 2008 at 10:14

Saturday, Jan 05, 2008 at 10:14
Duncs,
I thought you might be interested,
Distances displayed on NATMAP/AUSLIG maps were calculated from the map itself and not from a separate data set. The cartographers used to use a little scale wheel and run it along the depicted road from point A to Point B on the map and that was the measurement shown on the map. They did not physically go out and measure distances in the real world . Now days, the distances are computer generated from the GIS data from which the maps are derived. They are in not associated with the distances displayed on road side signs.
Toolman
0
FollowupID: 544067

Follow Up By: Member - Duncs - Saturday, Jan 12, 2008 at 07:59

Saturday, Jan 12, 2008 at 07:59
Hi Toolman,

The little scale wheel explains a lot. I have one that I used for calculating the length of bush walks and it is horribly inaccurate. It is worse on large scale maps, you simply can't follow every bend in the road and it flattens out hills so all the distances are short.

It would be easy to see how that little Qld town could be so far out. I guess in my naivety I had imagined some little guy running around Aus in an EH Holden with one of those bike wheels hung off the rear bumper to measure accurate distances. Pretty silly when I think about it.

The cartographer I spoke to did say that he would not publish a map until he had physically checked it by driving the route himself. He is a small scale specialist map maker who is well respected here in Aus.

Duncs
0
FollowupID: 545474

Reply By: jeepthing - Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 09:25

Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 09:25
As far as I'm concerned I'll back a gps over a speedodometer any day. There is a variable error built into the satelite which can change from day to day or hour to hour. I understand this is controlled by the US military.

This is why Laura has experienced the variations of 300 and 100m. Although I've never experienced those sort of errors. In my boat's gps the error can be virtually eliminated by comparing the charted position at a given location with the gps position and entering the error in the gps.

My understanding is that a vehicle type gps has been calibrated prior to sale, particularly the more upmarket ones.

I don't agree that it measures distance in a straight line when travelling on roads. I do a fair bit of travelling in the outback and use my gps in conjunction with my rasta maps and have always found that if the map indicates that a certain road/point of interest is x k from my starting point the gps is spot on in distance and position when the target is reached.

Same applies when I'm fishing I can go back to that same small piece of reef any time.
AnswerID: 279489

Follow Up By: Member - Matt (Perth-WA) - Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:50

Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:50
Selective Availability was turned off in May 2001. There is no induced error in civilian GPS units now. The US has the ability to introduce error or deny access to a specifis region (during conflict) if the need arises.

Matt.
0
FollowupID: 543693

Follow Up By: jeepthing - Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 16:42

Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 16:42
Matt,

I knew that Selective Availability was turned off but I understood that the Ephemeris Data which is monitored and uploaded by the US Military and used to ACCURATELY calculate your location is only available for a limited time each day and up to date data is needed to minimise error resulting from minor errors in the satelite's orbit. These minor variations can equate to larger variations in accuracy on the ground, from centmetres to metres.

Anyway I'm certainly no expert on the subject all I know is that both my gps units are extremely accurate. My boats gps is deadly accurate due to the ability to eliminate error. I can navigate to the same ledge or small rock every time without having to perform a grid search.

Both my gps' have the ability to lock on to 4 satelites which I guess is the difference between a cheapie and an upmarket one.

0
FollowupID: 543743

Reply By: Member - Bucky (VIC) - Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 09:42

Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 09:42
I used our GPS to check uot our speedo, and its spot on.

Just remember, Australian Design Rules, 10% speedo variation, is considered normal ( I could be wrong, maybe less now )
Most vehicles that are out, are reading up 10% higher than the actaul speed, so its a built in "no speeding fine technology" (hehehehe)

Also consider that when the road distances are measured by some of the most intelligent council/main road people on the planet !.

So that has to be built into everything as well..
Trust your GPS for the above reasons, and drive your carefully.

Cheers Mate
Bucky
AnswerID: 279491

Reply By: Member - Coyote (QLD) - Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:53

Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:53
GPS's also do a small amount of 'rounding' when recording a track, eg if you are driving along a track that winds a lot, you will find that the actual recorded track / distance measured gets shortened by the GPS and it takes redingevery so often (you can adjust the frequency/ number of points it records to make a track) but it is still a collection of short straight lines put together to give you your track.. the further between the 'points' the less accurate the actual recording.. over the distance you travelled say 2000 and something k's if it was a route the wpound around a fair but, the GPS will have rounded off a lot of the corners giving you a shorter distance travelled.
AnswerID: 279497

Reply By: Gone Bush (WA) - Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 19:54

Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 19:54
Some of the more expensive, and therefore more accurate, GPSs have a flux capacitor in them which prevents errors.

True as I sit here.
I'm glad I ain't too scared to be lazy
- Augustus McCrae (Lonesome Dove)

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 279800

Reply By: Member - Mick O (VIC) - Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 21:13

Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 21:13
If it all boils down to a speedo inaccuracy, hang the GPS and why not get your friendly neighbourhood traffic plod to put his hair dryer or laser thingo over your car at 100kph? What about the "Speed check" radars on major motor ways in Vic and NSW?

Mick
''We knew from the experience of well-known travelers that the
trip would doubtless be attended with much hardship.''
Richard Maurice - 1903

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

AnswerID: 279827

Sponsored Links