AnswerID: 29944 Submitted: Tuesday, Sep 02, 2003 at 22:32
CAMEL
replied:
Sounds like comparing a peanut to a bucket of KFC if your hungry?
4 of us tried them, 3 cruisers & a mits all diesels, results varied.
mits was noticible, turbo did come in earlier & economy better by 1.5lt /100km
1 cruiser had 2 with improvement in mid-range & economy, again 1.2lt/100km
the other 2 were pretty much insignifficant & were returned
One thing thing we all agreed upon was the reduction in black smoke
As for $/ go power not really worth it, economy improvement it's 20 000km
to recover costs / unit. Overall its 50/50
It's not a turbo effect but would put it between what you have now & a turbo is a quality set of extractors (the upper end) & tuned exhaust for about $800
The tuned system doesn't have the bark as others do, & power is noticibly better.
I've had both. Hope this helps.
Reply 6 of 7