AnswerID: 49146 Submitted: Thursday, Mar 04, 2004 at 15:08
chrisfrd
replied:
Actually,
I'd go farther than this... If the manufacturer applies the "Compliant with API xxxxx. CF-xxxxx ACEA-xxxxx" and the manufacturer of the engine states that you must use "API-abc" and no other, then YOU have invalidated your warranty.
Caveat Emptor applies!
If, however, both matched and the engine blew, then you start knocking on the oil manufacturers door, asking that they replace the engine under their liability insurance, only if their product was tested and proven not to perform to the stated mark.
Australia also has adopted the ISO standard for testing and rating lubricants. A product must be tested and achieve the advertised ISO standard.
The current standards are available from the ISO website or through www.australianstandards.com.au.
If any company provides a lubricant that does not apply to the relevant ISO standards, then they SHALL be in breach of trading standards! They can be sued! I would sue any person that provided me products or services on fraudulent information, you should too.
Subjectively now... In saying that, I prefer synthetic oil bases, as they don't suffer from as much degredation in high-stress environments, that are found in multi-valve high-pressure diesel engines. I used to use Penrite HPR-Deisel Light, but now that I've moved to
South AUstralia, I'm finding it hard to obtain.
If this product, bull bleep -disregarded (in otherwords ignore all sales pitches and ask for factual
technical documentation on the product, including any test results based on calibrated test equipment) works, then I would consider changing to it.
Reply 5 of 6