AnswerID: 176761 Submitted: Monday, Jun 05, 2006 at 09:11
Member - Omaroo (NSW)
replied:
I've had both units. Unlike those that like to say that the one they have is better than the other just because they have one, I can say in my own mind that I'd buy a Glind again over the Twine. Both of our units have been in two vehicles for about the same amount of time and both have worked well. No real problems with either. It's just that the Glind still looks new where the Twine looks old and battered - with paint flaking off its body. All aesthetic - no more, but there you go.
The "so called" plastic shell of the Glind is not.... just merely "plastic" as such. It's glass-filled nylon - which is incredibly tough and durable - IMHO moreso than copper. Copper is OK until you have to bend it - or solder/braze it. After that, depending on how it's treated - it's either still soft (annealed) through quick cooling - or it's quite hard and very brittle if left to
cool slowly. Either way it's not exactly mechanically strong in either case. Personally I'd rather trust the Glind unit in this regard. Even though DB's broke - it may not have been installed very well, and probably had the full weight of an unsupported hose full of coolant hanging off the end over tens of thousands of outback kilometres. I dare say the copper Twine would have suffered a similar fate in his example.
If you go by what Toyota discovered when doing its initial research into the various units on the market to install as its factory-backed option - it decided to go with the Glind unit as its OEM offering. Not sure whether or not that still stands - but they chose it on its quality traits over the Twine. Piranha also chose it as their own as well and sell it under their label.
Just my 2c
 | '00 Land Rover Defender TD5
'96 Mitsubishi Delica 2.8TD
'95 Nissan Patrol GQ TD42T
'91 Nissan Patrol GQ RB-30
Our property: http://www.omaroo.net |
Reply 10 of 11