AnswerID: 192305 Submitted: Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 12:23
camship
replied:
After 5 years resale would be a major issue I would think.
I would choose prado for the following reasons;
Toyota reputation for quality and reliabilty.
Prado has far superior resale.
New Common rail will be a great engine for drivabilty and economy.
Grande has a massive range of features.
Pretty good offroad if not going over harsh terrain.
180lt fuel capacity = 1500plus ks to tank.
All the others you mention have dubious reputation and poor retained values.
The jeep is extremely weird looking and too expensive for what you get.
Land Rover probably is the better vehicle but has a horrible reputation for relaiblity .
Pathfinder just dissapears into the landscape, nobody seems to want them when second hand.
Pajero is not in the ballpark for the way they drive, and resale is poor again.
Think about this; Prado approx. 5 year resale about 55 - 60% Pajero approx 5 year resale about 45-50%
Reply 12 of 17
FollowupID: 450170 Submitted:
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 14:05
Member - Andrew (QLD) posted:
A vary biased opinion indeed.
The difference in 5 year resale value between the pajero and the grande would be around $7000 (less in some cases) if your figures are to be believed. However this would be negated to a huge extent by the fact that the difference in fuel consumption of these two vehicles would add up to 3100 litres plus in favour of the pajero using their quoted fuel economy numbers and averaging 25000km per year. (13.2 vs 10.7)
I'm not even sure where you are coming from when stating that "Pajero is not in the ballpark for the way they drive"........what is this based upon? Have you actually driven one and compared it to the others?
Why do "the others" have dubious reputations? Why should the new pathfinder dissapear into the landscape? There seems to be too many inconsistencies in the argument to say that the prado wins on almost all accounts.
If the jeep was extremely wierd looking, why do they sell them. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Maybe not your cup of tea, however a poor reason to bag the vehicle. I think the front of the Prado looks wierd with its lights however it is not helpful for the OP to decide on the vehicle. The fact that they have listed these four vehicles means that the looks of it hasn't turned them off purchasing one.
Whilst i drive a pajero, i hate it when people promote false accusations. Each vehicle has its benefits and disadvantages, and you have to weigh up all factors to form a guided decision. I'm not saying that the prado may not be the best choice for the OP situation, just that the information you have provided is incorrect.
Andrew
 Click Image to Enlarge |
| It may be that my sole purpose in life is to
serve as a warning to others!
|
FollowUp 1 of 6
FollowupID: 450182 Submitted:
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 16:09
camship posted:
Thank you Andrew.
All Im saying is what I would do.
I guess I get to see things from a different point of view, as a vehicle wholesaler I need to make wise descisions on buying and selling vehicle that are secondhand, looking at the second hand market objectivley is very important for anybody looking at buying a new vehicle.
Unfortunatley some dealers will not even take on their own products seconhand because they are incredibly difficult to resell, for varying reasons. Once a vehicle gets a bad reputation in this country, it tends to stick.
I have never had a problem trying to resell a Prado, Dealers in fact line up for them, and will pay very good money to get a good one. Its not the only car like that, but certainly compared to the others mentioned.
I dont dislike the Pajero at all, and its is not a bad vehicle to own. However my opinion on this topic is shared by many in the industry.
Cameron.
FollowUp 2 of 6
FollowupID: 450186 Submitted:
Saturday, Sep 02, 2006 at 17:02
Member - Andrew (QLD) posted:
That's ok.......as a vehicle wholesaler, i would summise that you would be looking at the bottom dollar, buying low, selling high, sell quick :-) The value that the vehicle is sold for is higher on your priority rather than life cycle costs, though these costs do affect price in the end to some extent.
I would agree with you though that it would be easier for you to sell, say a prado, due to various reasons, however not necessarily due to "being a better ride" etc. Each owner is looking for different features, however i am always wary of people who try to sell you a product due to their belief that it is better (when really it is a matter of "i have this vehicle etc for sale"). I'm not saying your one of these people, as i don't know you :-)
thanks for your response,
Andrew
 Click Image to Enlarge |
| It may be that my sole purpose in life is to
serve as a warning to others!
|
FollowUp 3 of 6