Monday, Dec 03, 2007 at 19:40
You are particularly melodramatic today GXL.
"Who is at fault if in an accident?"
What sort of accident? That is a pretty ridiculous question surely. As if totally legal tyres should have any impact on who is at fault.
Why should the vehicle not have been on the road? It is totally legal to have larger tyres - there are limits, but most 285/75s on a 1HZ are legal.
"Try and put it through what it was built for"... now, what do you have in mind? Do you forget that it travels from one end of the country to the other including some of the most challenging tracks,
the desert, the high country, the
Kimberley, to name a few, fully loaded to manufacturer's limits including with a trailer.
"Upset the whole geometry of the vehicle" - more melodrama and hyperbole. In many ways, my vehicle with modified
suspension rides and handles better than the stock vehicle when fully loaded. Very little of the geometry of the vehicle is affected by putting on bigger tyres - think through exactly what you are saying. That an inch or so extra height from slightly bigger wheels changes everything? Sure it has some effects, but not so much as you imply.
Even my insurers are happy to cover the vehicle explicitly with 285/75s and given the number of vehicles with this setup, you'd think they'd know if it was a higher risk.
The vehicle has done 150,000 ks in its current setup with no particular strains on the drive train noticeable... it is checked over meticulously very regularly and is doing very
well. Perhaps with a Paj things might be different, but with my truck I think it can be recommended if you're happy with the clear implications - less power and speedo error, in particular.
When you don't know what you're talking about don't talk about it.
FollowupID:
538491