a tale of 2 <span class="highlight">gps</span>,s

Submitted: Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 19:34
ThreadID: 40967 Views:2289 Replies:10 FollowUps:8
This Thread has been Archived
goodday all
i have 2 gps,s 1 is the trusty old magellan 310 8 satellites max and the other is my street finder navigator 12 sat max with the 2units side by side 1 reads
lat 38.05070long 145.27461
the other lat 38,0305 long 145.1647

dont know how much difference that is in metres but i wouldnt have thought that 2 satelites would make that much difference when the units are side by side

any ideas

steve
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Scubaroo - Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 19:44

Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 19:44
Have you got them both set to the same datum, e.g. WGS84?
AnswerID: 213864

Follow Up By: Gob & Denny - Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 20:54

Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 20:54
goodday mate
cant change the voxson and cant find what it is set on but it must be right as the cross is sitting right on top of the house
tomorrow i will set up laptop and see where that puts me the laptop is set on wgs84

steve
0
FollowupID: 474187

Reply By: Doggy Tease - Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 19:50

Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 19:50
i'm hearing ya mate, and i was about to ask this very question.
i have a little Garmin Gecko 201 and the lat/long is S 32 06 214 E 115 50 787
the Garmin I-Que M4 is S 32 06 223 E 115 50 788

How come they are different when they are right next to each other?
Anybody know how to get the I-Que to talk to the pc through Ozi?

rick.

meow.
AnswerID: 213865

Reply By: Member - Jay Gee (WA) - Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 19:55

Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 19:55
Have you got them set to the sames lat/long format

There are three formats:
(1) Degress. minutes, seconds
(2) Degrees, minutes, decimal minutes
(3) Decimal degrees
AnswerID: 213868

Follow Up By: Gob & Denny - Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 20:57

Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 20:57
goodday jay gee
310 is set on deg/min and voxson gives same reading but cant change the voxson

steve
0
FollowupID: 474188

Reply By: Richard Kovac - Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 19:56

Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 19:56
0.1876km long and .06649km lat I think

Next question LOL ;-)

Richard
AnswerID: 213869

Follow Up By: Richard Kovac - Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 20:08

Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 20:08
dam it I'm miles out..lol
0
FollowupID: 474177

Reply By: x4by4 - Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 20:02

Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 20:02
Steeve,
The first unit is displaying deg.deg format while the second unit is displaying Deg.min
so converting the first to Deg.min = 38.03042 and 145.1647 which is very close.
Shouldn't get lost with two units :)
Peter
AnswerID: 213870

Reply By: Barnray - Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 20:03

Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 20:03
Do you live near a quarry or a creek, I make about 16.5k between points. barnray
AnswerID: 213871

Reply By: The Explorer - Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 20:05

Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 20:05
Hello - yes I have an idea.. Nothing to do with Datum..that is ok.

One gps unit is set to display decimal degrees..(ie whole degrees with minutes and seconds as a decimal)

Lat 38.05070° long 145.27461°

and the other is set to display Decimal minutes (ie Whole degrees and whole minutes with seconds as a decimal) ..properly written as

lat 38° 03.05' long 145° 16.47'

Using my thoery they then plot 17m apart (could be better) instead of 9km apart. Datum issues are generally +/- ~200m.

Cheers
Greg
I sent one final shout after him to stick to the track, to which he replied “All right,” That was the last ever seen of Gibson - E Giles 23 April 1874

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message
Moderator

AnswerID: 213872

Reply By: Exploder - Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 20:07

Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 20:07
Don’t you only need 4 satellites for a Fix as 1 checks over the other 3 and the one that disagrees with the others is bumped off, LOL

Also if the Internal Clock in the GPS is out buy a 1/10th of a Microsecond or some BullS**t like that compared to the satellite clock then that apparently would make a difference in reading.

AnswerID: 213873

Reply By: Member - Doug T (W.A) - Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 22:21

Sunday, Jan 07, 2007 at 22:21
Steve
I get a distance of 9.9 klm apart

S38.03050 E145.16470 is near Pillars and Bowman Rd near Bangholme

S38.05070 E145.27461 On Cypress Cl

Doug
gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 213908

Follow Up By: Gob & Denny - Monday, Jan 08, 2007 at 11:19

Monday, Jan 08, 2007 at 11:19
goodday doug
2nd answer spot on
thats with my voxson
steve
0
FollowupID: 474267

Reply By: Jayson - Monday, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:34

Monday, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:34
To add weight to my response, I am a degree qualified surveyor.

To do any comparison between units:
*You MUST have both units displaying results using the same datum. Usually WGS84
*You MUST have both units receiving the same number of satellites. You'll need at least four satellites for position and height. The more the merrier.
*The units MUST be "seeing" the same satellites. This means the same same space vehicle numbers (SVN).
*The units MUST be using the same SVN's in its calculation of your position. This can be checked by looking further into your units satellite info page for a VDOP, HDOP (vertical/horizontal dilution of precision) numberss. This is a factor which describes the "strength" of the positional calculation based on the geometry of the satellites used in the calculation of the position.

Whilst these units are getting increasingly user friendly, you can see there is still "magic" happening inside them that does require more in-depth knowledge for you to do the kind of comparison, and interpret the results meaninigfully, that you are trying to do.
I'm certainly not intending to belittle anybody, but hopefully sharing some knowledge. We're all experts at something.

Have complete faith in any GPS you use as long as the datum is the same as the paper map you are using. THIS IS A GOLDEN RULE. Have some understanding of degrees, minutes, seconds vs decimal degrees vs UTM eastings and northings.

To help you work out the difference between your two different readings, use the following:

1 minute of longitude = 1 nautical mile = 1.852 kms (exactly)
1 minute of longitude = 60 seconds
1 second of logitude = 1852m/60 = 30.87m

This conversion applies to latitude as well, at the equator, but changes as you get closer to the poles.

Cheers
Jayson
AnswerID: 213956

Follow Up By: Gob & Denny - Monday, Jan 08, 2007 at 11:22

Monday, Jan 08, 2007 at 11:22
goodday jayson
thanks for the above info
i will do a total reset of the 310 and see if that solves the problem if not it might be time for an upgrade

steve
0
FollowupID: 474268

Follow Up By: Pajman Pete (SA) - Monday, Jan 08, 2007 at 17:32

Monday, Jan 08, 2007 at 17:32
Jayson,

I'm not a surveyor, just an ex Navy navigator who spent years marking off nautcal miles using the lattitude scale on the side of the chart.

I thought 1 minute of _lattitude_ = 1 nautical mile = 1.852 kms.

A minute of longitude = 1nm only at the equator, getting progressively smaller as you approach the poles..

Pete
Any mug can be uncomfortable out bush

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 474317

Follow Up By: obee - Monday, Jan 08, 2007 at 21:15

Monday, Jan 08, 2007 at 21:15
Yep, latitude is the constant marked on the longitude line but an easy slip up to make. Bet you kicking yourself LOL.

I remember reading the Lasseter story and how he went up on a hill away from the others with his sextant and when he came back he told everyone his chronometer must have been wrong on his first trip so the expedition was too far north. Chronometer is needed to get longitude but north/south is done with almanac and sextant (or theodolite). When I read that I new he was a con man or Walter Mitty syndrome, but certainly not a truth teller.

Owen
0
FollowupID: 474370

Follow Up By: Jayson - Monday, Jan 08, 2007 at 22:45

Monday, Jan 08, 2007 at 22:45
Please exchange the word "latitude" for " longitude".

I should not post technical info first thing after 12 hour night shifts.

Cheers

Jays

0
FollowupID: 474389

Sponsored Links