Kogan 12 volt TVs
Submitted: Friday, May 17, 2013 at 17:03
ThreadID:
102264
Views:
8266
Replies:
12
FollowUps:
26
This Thread has been Archived
Gavin M2
I have recently purchased a 24" Kogan LED TV as a second one for the caravan/annexe after noting many favourable reviews on here by other caravanners.
First thing I noticed was that the aspect ratio was "off". I measured the physical screen (517 x 323) which equals a 16:10 aspect ratio. The menu provides an aspect ratio selection of 16:9, 4:3, zoom1 or zoom2 (but no 16:10!).
Am I missing something? What manufacturer produces a TV with aspect ratio options that don't correspond with the size of the screen? Duh!
When a 16:9 transmission is stretched to fit a 16:10 screen it is distorted depth wise (people appear slightly thinner). This annoys me when I'm watching a brand new TV.
My other 12V caravan TV (a TEAC from JB Hi Fi) has a screen that measures (520 x 293) or exactly 16:9 and the picture is very pleasing.
Has anyone else noticed the slightly distorted images on their Kogan TVs and has anyone found a solution?
Gavin
Reply By: Member - J&R - Friday, May 17, 2013 at 17:43
Friday, May 17, 2013 at 17:43
So you want to buy multiple TV's to suit all aspect ratios and resolutions?
Set it to run in it's native resolution.
If a program is in 4:3 then it will appear so, just not as wide as 16:9.
Anything in 16:9 will have black bits above and below.
Then get it to fit the screen if the setting is available. It will crop it slightly.
16:10 is not a native Aussie resolution but is used in other industries.
AnswerID:
511255
Follow Up By: fisho64 - Sunday, May 19, 2013 at 23:36
Sunday, May 19, 2013 at 23:36
I think you need to reread his post. When it should be 16:9 it is actually 16:10
FollowupID:
789660
Reply By: KenInPerth - Friday, May 17, 2013 at 19:46
Friday, May 17, 2013 at 19:46
Just some FYI.
Just maybe these "TV's" have been a way for them to dispose of unwanted 16:10 panels left over in the other industries who did want them any more (refer below). That would be another reason they are a lower cost item - many items in our industry all of a sudden appear on the market at a "good price" because they are superceded.
I wonder if the ratio was in the sales information associated with your purchase as it is not something you would pick up on easily, and as we all know the "non Australian" markets will say anything true or false to sell product. The answer is almost always "Yes" to any question - whatever you want to hear !!
16:10, also known as 8:5, is an aspect ratio mostly used for computer displays and tablet computers. The width of the display is 1.6 times its height. This ratio is close to the golden ratio which is approximately 1.618 (this is apparently an aesthetically pleasing ratio in architecture and arts).
LCD computer displays using the 16:10 ratio started to appear in the mass market from 2003. By 2008 16:10 had become the most common aspect ratio for LCD monitors and laptop displays. Since 2010, however, 16:9 has become the mainstream standard, driven by the 1080p standard for high definition television.
AnswerID:
511264
Reply By: Gavin M2 - Friday, May 17, 2013 at 21:37
Friday, May 17, 2013 at 21:37
I could live with the non-standard 16:10 screen if the picture could be displayed correctly in 16:9 using the "letterbox" method (black bars top and bottom).
With this 24" Kogan, when you select 16:9 in the aspect ratio menu you get a 16:9 picture stretched depth wise to fit their 16:10 screen!!! In other words, NOT 16:9. When I purchased it off their website I assumed it complied with Australian standards - who would have thought you should
check the actual screen dimensions?
I hate viewing TVs with incorrectly set aspect ratios. Some people are blissfully unaware they are viewing a distorted picture but I notice it immediately.
If I can't find a way to view in correct 16:9 this TV is going back. What a nuisance - last time I buy a TV sight unseen online.
Gavin
AnswerID:
511275
Reply By: howesy - Saturday, May 18, 2013 at 23:39
Saturday, May 18, 2013 at 23:39
I don't get it,,,,,it's like buying a Lada after people said they were OK and complaining about the quality compared to a Patrol,,,
like they said you get what you pay for if its cheap there is a reason for that.
AnswerID:
511349
Follow Up By: garrycol - Sunday, May 19, 2013 at 00:01
Sunday, May 19, 2013 at 00:01
But you no longer get what you pay for - sellers charge what they can get away with - hence some low quality goods are now sold for low and high prices and some high quality goods are now sold for low and high prices. Price is no longer a gauge of quality - if it ever was.
FollowupID:
789563
Follow Up By: Gavin M2 - Sunday, May 19, 2013 at 21:55
Sunday, May 19, 2013 at 21:55
No, it's like buying a Lada and complaining because the wheels have five holes but the hubs have four studs - they just don't fit together even though the quality of each wasn't in question.
Australian 16:9 transmissions simply don't fit correctly on a 16:10 screen, as good as it may be (for computers).
I still accept your point though - in many cases, you get what you pay for.
Gavin
FollowupID:
789654