Tuesday, Apr 08, 2014 at 16:56
I don't think it has much to do with the relative balance between the van and tug brakes. There is a lot of cases where the brakes were not used. Have you not seen the number of reports in the news where vans have jack-knifed and flipped? Most of these have a comment from the driver in the form of "we don't know what happen, we were travelling along nicely and then things happened without warning." If the jack-knifing problem was a problem with brakes then these accidents would not have happened as brakes were not used.
The problem is all tied up with the distribution of weight in the van and the relative size of the van to the tug. The distribution of weight in the van includes the way the van is built as
well as the way it is loaded. For best stability vans should be built with the centre of gravity
well forward of the axle. They also should have the weight concentrated towards the middle of the van. The more the weight is concentrated in the middle the lighter the ball weight can be.
Critical speed: this subject was broached earlier. The critical speed of a van is the speed that when that speed is exceed the van has the potential to become unstable and uncontrollable. I use the term "potential to become unstable" as things feel fine as things will seem fine until some external force upsets the travel of the van (and then things go ape bleep .) People often get the the impression their long heavy van is stable as when they try to make it snake they find it hard to make it do so. Collyn Rivers sums up the effect
well in his article "Vehicle Dynamics:"
"A long end-heavy caravan commonly
feels more stable than a short one with
centralised mass (short twin-axled ‘vans are
usually very stable but often feel ‘twitchy’
due to their fast but minor movements),
but such impressions are illusory.
Inertia is not the same thing at all as
inherent stability: a giant container ships
seems ultra-stable - until a rogue wave rolls
it too far - and its inertia keeps it rolling).
“My mega-van always seemed
rock stable
until the day it jack knived and rolled over”
is a very common post-accident reflection."
One of the problems we have is those who unwittingly reduce the critical speed (and thus the stability of their van) by adding boxes and liquid containers to the ends of their vans. In an effort to increase the stability of our vans we should be building them as the Europeans do. You will note they don't have thing on the ends of them like bumper bars and spare wheels. the front boots are a lot smaller, they don't have front or rear kitchens.
When people add things to the ends of the van they consider that if they add equal amounts of weight to each end to maintain the same ball weight then all is
well. It is not. Remember back when we started to balance our wheels. All the tyre retailers got those devices that you sat your wheels on, you then added weights so the wheel became dead horizontal (a bullseye level was provided to assist in the process.) This was referred to as static balance. In short time this was found to be fairly useless, particularly with the wider tyres. The next step was dynamic balancing and that is still in use today. It's the same with caravans. Static balancing does not save your bacon, you need to consider the dynamics of the moving rig. When you add weight to your van tha dynamics of the van are not changed in a linear manner. The effect of the added weight works in a square law manner. That is, the yawing effects of the added weight increase in in a square law as the distance from the centre of gravity is increased.
See this link
Vehicle Dynamics
AnswerID:
530118