?mark on 3.9V8

Submitted: Sunday, Mar 07, 2004 at 23:59
ThreadID: 11082 Views:2141 Replies:3 FollowUps:0
This Thread has been Archived
Hi guys, just a quick question re the 3.9V8, iam currently considering buying a 1995-1997 discovery and due to the limited numberf of TDi's within my price range I was considering a V8 (3.9) however have been advised by others that to stay away from them due to the problems they have with 'head' bolts letting go due to the lack of metal surrounding them in the block, can anyone shed some light on this, is this a fact, iam also told that 'land rover dealers' 'pressure test' any V8 Discovery they have traded in prior to offering a price on it. Ive also been told that 'duel fuel' is not an option with them due to some 'blow off valve' in the air intake set up, I know they were reportedly 'thirsty' on fuel but at the moment that is not a consideration of mine.
thanks for the opportunity to ask this question
regards Rooster
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Rosco - Bris. - Monday, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:47

Monday, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:47
Rooster

I had a 96 Disco V8 for about 7 years + 150000 km any never heard of that problem. Seems to be another of those urban myths. The 3.9 is based on the original 3.5 with slightly increased capacity. That setup has been around for donkeys years so I hardly think a head bolt problem is going to arrive out of the blue. I had to replace the valley gasket on mine, but that's a typical issue with any V8. Don't know about the dual fuel issue as I wasn't interested in going there.
They're probably no more thirsty than the big sixes .... 16-20 L per 100 km, depending on conditions and driving style.

Cheers
AnswerID: 49489

Reply By: David O - Wednesday, Mar 10, 2004 at 16:53

Wednesday, Mar 10, 2004 at 16:53
I've owned both the 3.5 and the 3.9 in Range Rovers. Still own a 3.9. No such issue has ever come to my attention. I am an avid reader of all Rangie forums and this issue if it exists ( and I doubt it does) has never been mentioned.

Head gasket problems were real, especially in badly maintained V8s as they have metal shim gaskets which can corrode if the cooling sytem is not treated with respect.

Having said all of that, if I had the choice of Td vs petrol, there would want to be a huge difference in price before I would choose a petrol landrover again. Why? better economy, better range (important for touring), better reliability, less little quirks. Just my opinion though.
AnswerID: 49809

Reply By: NathanK - Tuesday, Apr 06, 2004 at 13:10

Tuesday, Apr 06, 2004 at 13:10
i have a 1995 V8 on dual fuel with no problems whatsoever. never had any dramas with the motor. it currently has 126,000kms on it and it's been totally trouble free.

the gas is great - i use the disco as my daily driver and going up and down the freeway in peak traffic is sure thirsty on the V8, but on gas it only costs me $16 a week to run (not bad at all.)

the gas is less economical around the city than the petrol, but on open runs they're pretty similar. i have the original 80l petrol tank and a 70l gas setup, so combined i get close to 1000kms on one fuelling, good for heading up north.

the only issue i've had with the gas (and it's just happened now) is if it's out of tune, running rough or needing a service, unburnt gas builds up then backfires through the air-intake - possibly what you're referring to. you simply just need to book the car in for a tune-up when that happens. you also need to replace the original clamps on the air-filter box with spring clips. this way, if the gas does backfire the top of the intake box simply lifts up and expels the charge without causing any damage.

if not, you get an almight bang from the front left end, similar to hitting a roo or a huge pothole, when it's simply the gas backfiring.

i'd recommend the dual fuel setup anytime. great, cheap driving around the city, plus the grunt and power of the 3.9l petrol motor when off-road. be mindful to run the motor for about a half tank of petrol every 3-5 gas tankfuls to help motor lubrication and reduce wear.

nathan
AnswerID: 53378

Sponsored Links