Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 17:37
Tom
We can dream up a lot of hypotheticals with this discussion, in fact they would be endless. I mean, who is to say the Sat-phone survived? So let's not get too bogged down with hypo's!
The main thing is that neither is exclusively mutual – Sat-phone or HF.
The roll-over argument is often cited as a reason not to have a
HF Radio due to many being mounted on a bull-bar. But is the risk as high as some suggest?
A self-tune HF antenna can be mounted with consideration to the possibility of a roll-over in a way that damage may be avoided. We have one mounted on the rear of our vehicle that has a high level of protection should we suffer a roll-over. The Codan 3050 lends itself to being mounted with an optimum level of protection due its compact size and dimension.
Noting they should not be mounted on a bull-bar as most, if not all, State Regulations prohibit it.
Mounting it the way I have may lead to some degraded performance, but gives a far better chance of being there when needed.
A
HF Radio does not need a self-tuning antenna to operate, in fact they are a more modern addition to a very reliable form of communication that pre-date many other forms.
Mind you, these days you can purchase a portable HF Antenna that can be used as a back-up, no tuner required, but I’ll leave that to others to explain better than I could ever hope to…
Cheers, Baz – The Landy
FollowupID:
839534