Monday, Jun 29, 2015 at 21:44
Gronk posted:
I don't think you'll find any manufacturer will have a rating stamped on their tow/recovery hooks..
I started working on 4wd Toyotas in the 1970s and there was no rating on their front mounted hooks and it is the same today. The handbook for my 03 ute shows a tie down point on the passenger side and a towing hook on the driver's side. There is no rating on it and the book clearly states that it is for towing only.
I emailed Toyota when I bought the car and they said Toyota does not support the use of snatch straps and their cars are not rated for them. That would mean not only are the hooks not suitable for snatch straps but the chassis mounting points as
well. If you look through the net you will find examples of both breaking although the number of hooks that have ripped their mounting bolts out seems to be a lot higher than those that have broken.
I am not sure what the definition of a recovery is. Towing is a recovery. Winching is just slow towing so that must be a recovery. A half a dozen blokes pushing a bogged car is also a recovery. Jacking and putting something under the wheels can also recover a car.
Snatch straps are definitely a form of recovery but no car that I am aware of is rated for them. When you look at the number of accidents and injuries that have occurred during recoveries, 99.9% have been with snatch straps. I suppose when manufacturers do design their cars for them, that percentage will drop to about zero.
This article is worth reading. I have seen a few others that say the same thing.
http://www.4wdhandbook.com.au/rmp/blog/myth-rated-4WD-recovery-points
FollowupID:
842692