Saturday, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:01
Hi
If you want more detail when driving (or walking) you need to get larger scale maps (i.e. 25K , 50K) - simple fact.
200K/250K scale maps simply do not show enough detail when driving in some areas. e.g. cities/forests. Below is a screen shot of a section of
Perth from 200K scale map. followed by a 25K scale map of similar area.
200K Perth
25K Perth
What would be better for navigating around the streets of
Perth? Answer obvious.
Same scenario in the forest ....
200K Forest
25K Forest
Clearly 25K better with the 200K map not even showing most tracks.
As far as screen size goes it is always a compromise between size and what each person finds practical. HN7 is fine for viewing 25K maps - its actually much bigger than most "street" navigators and phones which people use all the time in cities for large scale maps.
Memory is much less of a drama these days with large size SD cards available. Space management still may be required but I would be not giving up on large scale maps because "you will need a lot of memory".
With raster maps I would guess than many people have a range of maps at various scales to suit various circumstances. In many cases a small scale 200K map is more than adequate and all you need. In other areas larger scale maps (25, 50 or 100K) are without doubt better. There is no need to restrict yourself to one set - get what suits you needs.
Cheers
Greg
| I sent one final shout after him to stick to the track, to which he replied “All right,” That was the last ever seen of Gibson - E Giles 23 April 1874 Lifetime Member My Profile My Blog Send Message Moderator |
FollowupID:
858496