Greasable Shackles vs Non Greasable
Submitted: Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:43
ThreadID:
134119
Views:
12934
Replies:
12
FollowUps:
12
This Thread has been Archived
Frank P (NSW)
Good morning to all the mechanics out there.
My BT50 had non greasable shackle bushes in the rear springs (leaf).
I had a
suspension upgrade done. As far as I can tell, all
suspension upgrades, including
mine, use greasable shackles on the rear leaf packs.
I grease
mine every 5000km or so. This morning, grease was coming out from under
the nut outside the shackle rather than between the bush and the shackle, which makes me think that fresh grease is maybe not getting into all the
places it should.
Two questions:
1 Should I be concerned and chase that up?
2 If non-greasable bushes are used by manufacturers, why do aftermarket manufacturers use greasable? Is there and advantage of one over the other?
Many thanks in advance for your advice.
Cheers
Reply By: Hoyks - Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:35
Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:35
The grease should be between the pin/end plates and the bush. If it coming out from under
the nut, then it is because it can't squeeze between the bush and the end plate for some reason. It might be as simple as pumping grease while someone jumps on the tow ball to make the
suspension flex and break the seal between the plate and the bush. You could back
the nut off a few turns too.
On
mine the grease was pushing the bush out past the side plates, that took some fixing and new swear words were invented.
Why don't manufactures use them? Cost mainly.
The stock bushes were a softer rubber, so didn't transfer the road noise quite as much and will do the job quite
well for most buyers. They also didn't creak and groan when they were dusty or dry.
Greasable cost more to make and more time to fit on the production line and need more maintenance.
AnswerID:
607658
Reply By: swampy - Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:38
Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:38
Hi
Yes u should be concerned with grease not going where it should ,its best for grease to lube all the surfaces . Can u do something about it not really . As long as the bushes are in good condition leave it at that .
The bush should not rotate the shackle pin needs to rotate inside the bush .
A good industrial pin has a grease spiral machined in to allow for good spread of grease to all load surfaces .
What type of urethane bushes do u use ??.
Overly hard bushes wear out shackle plates typically red yellow etc
The super pro blue bushes always seem to be the correct hardness and can last along time even with only being greased on upon first install .
Rubber grease only needs 1 application on new rubber bushes also .
AnswerID:
607660
Follow Up By: Frank P (NSW) - Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:44
Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:44
Hi Swampy,
Thanks. I think they are all-matal bushes. The grease used by the installer and which on his advice I have bought for
home maintenance is black moly stuff.
Cheers
FollowupID:
877347
Follow Up By: RMD - Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 14:42
Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 14:42
Frank P
They won't be all metal bushes. The polyurethane IS the bush. It is selected because of it's low coefficient of friction and resistance to wear while providing a cushioning ability and reasonable physical strength too.
FollowupID:
877355
Follow Up By: Frank P (NSW) - Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 15:14
Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 15:14
You guys are right - I was making assumptions.
I cleaned up around one shackle a bit. The bush is, presumably, polyurethane. It's either black or very dark blue. Can't see enough of it to tell.
Cheers
FollowupID:
877360
Reply By: Neil & Pauline - Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:39
Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:39
Not a qualified mechanic but a long time user of trailers. When the better "plastic" bushes came out I went that way. I found the greasable ones soon did not let graese into where it needed to be. In a simliar stuation on a back hoe, unless I greased every day the grease got hard and not go in correct area. Back to trailers, if I greased at least once a week seemed to be reasonably successful. the problem arises when not used for a few weeks.
Sometimes you can get away with getting grease into correct area by using a CRC type product. Will often loosen hardened grease to save a complete removal and clean. Plastic ones last for years, cheap to buy and easier to replace, don't rust in.
I think the after market guys are just ensuring repeat business in cleaning and replacement.
Neil
Neil
AnswerID:
607661
Reply By: RMD - Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:48
Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:48
The vehicle weight bearing down will push the shackle pins either to the top and bottom of the bushed inner surface.
I presume you always jack the vehicle chassis so that normal pin load is reversed AND the grease you administer gets to the ACTUAL wear surface. Unless you do that, the grease will travel along the crescent gap (Caused by the load) between the pin and the bush inner surface. Unfortunately it WON'T be under the area which you are trying/think you are lubricating.
Jack if up chassis, not running gear, first and then grease. The grease may then come out of different spots and actually grease the bushes/pins.
AnswerID:
607663
Follow Up By: Frank P (NSW) - Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:52
Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:52
Thank you RMD.
That is most logical, but I hadn't thought of it.
I will try it and post back here the result.
Cheers
FollowupID:
877348
Follow Up By: Frank P (NSW) - Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 13:22
Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 13:22
Jacking the chassis properly allowed grease into the four rear shackle bushes.
However, on both front bushes the grease comes out from under
the nut.
I have tried tightening the nuts. Fine thread, I was able to tighten them by 1/4 turn.
Should I try loosening? They cannot stay loose as they are not nylocs. (That can be rectified :-))
FollowupID:
877350
Follow Up By: RMD - Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 14:50
Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 14:50
Frank.
The only thing I can think of IS, When the front bushes are fitted there will be a CRUSH tube as the inner liner which is there to resist crushing of the mounts of the chassis.
It is quite possible the EXPERT fitter has installed a crush tube which is a split tube, ie rolled flat but of steel. that would allow grease under pressure to exit between the inner faces of the two bushes on each side and travel along
the gap between the bolt and the split tube. That will present the grease directly to the clearance where the bolt goes through the mount plate ans exit around and under the spring washer.
Better to have a hollow tube which isn't split IF that is the situation.
Check with the fitter and ask IF the tube is split lengthwise. Get it changed for a solid tube if it is..
FollowupID:
877357
Follow Up By: Frank P (NSW) - Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 15:07
Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 15:07
Thanks
Ross, I'll do that.
It's a Lovells GVM upgrade. They're a reputable company and I'd like to think would supply "not the cheapest", but I'll
check anyway.
Cheers
FollowupID:
877359
Follow Up By: Member - Keith P (NSW) - Wednesday, Jan 18, 2017 at 16:01
Wednesday, Jan 18, 2017 at 16:01
Another heads up od jacking up to grease shackles. Have done this to all my trucks over the years....and from memory never had to renew a shackle bush. Do it to my current van all the time ...even on the road. Only takes a couple of minutes with a good hydraulic jack to just start lifting wheel jacking under chassis or middle spring hanger .....3 or 4 shots of grease....and jobs done.
Cheers Keith
FollowupID:
877431
Reply By: The Bantam - Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 15:34
Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 15:34
Greasable shackles are only necessary on polly bushes ...... and msotly because Polly bushes will not retain grease ..... it has to be constantly applied.
Rubber bushes don't need to be greased and should not be greased.
Most of the aftermarket companies supply polly bushes because they are far easier to manufacture than rubber, especially in short runs.
There are advantages and disadvantages to both rubber and polly.
Back in the 80;s when polly first became popular everybody thaught they where an answer to all our prayers ..... it did not take long for many to realise that polly had issues and did not work at all
well in some situations.
I'm putting some new springs under the back of the hilux soon ..... I'll be using rubber bushes.
cheers
AnswerID:
607667
Follow Up By: pop2jocem - Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 16:13
Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 16:13
I agree with what Bantam has said.
When I had new extra leaf springs fitted to the front of my old Cruiser ute the company fitted greasable bushes, which got greased twice or so as often as the 5000 k general service interval.
The original rubber Toyota bushes lasted around 250,000 ks.
Even with regular greasing the new you beaut greasable jobbies are up for replacement after around 40,000 ks. We have in that distance covered the dreaded corrrugations of tracks like the GRR, but even so the originals did the CSR and such and still completed trips without the rapid wear rate.
I do have a spare set of greasable bushes which I will fit but after that I will be going back to the rubber originals, assuming I do keep the old ute.
Cheers
Pop
FollowupID:
877365
Follow Up By: Frank P (NSW) - Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 16:20
Tuesday, Jan 17, 2017 at 16:20
I would certainly like the maintenance-free aspect returned.
I suspect I'll be rep[lacing these with rubber when the time comes.
Thanks guys
FollowupID:
877366