Saturday, Oct 13, 2018 at 13:45
I like his theory in using lower front hanger and note he is using flat springs. That minimizes bump steer as the axle isn't being made to move much for/aft.
With
long flat leaf springs he has reduced the shocks and made the
suspension compliant. You can have a lighter frame if the hammering isn't being delivered to the body. Pajero vehicles are sheet metal, no chassis, but sound design
suspension.
Trailer pics.
The action of a link
suspension at the rear and the path of leaf spung axle is similar. The side under movement moves the axle rearward on that side. I don't think the wheel path is the exact opposite.
Some link suspensions have the arms positioned in a manner which reduces the overall effect because the pivots are made lower than can be achieved with a trailer. Ground clearance dictates much of that.
Looking at the trailer plans and see he has two shocks fitted per side. For the weight he is carrying two has to be used to see noticeable control.
If the lower pivots were positioned further out and the shocks mounted from axle to side frame, any axle movement would cause more shock stroke and more control with just one shock.
The two per side as pictured, are positioned so they cause more stress on the mounts. He isn't using the "principle of levers" much at all. If a wheel moves upward over a bump, the shock positioned that way receive far less movement at the mounting points and so are limited in their control. Most 4wd and cars don't mount shocks like that because of the lessening of effect.
Angle mounted shocks like those shown are generally used where a high degree of articulation is required, ie, 500mm travel per side and for that you can't use shocks mounted where they provide most control. Just add more shock numbers is the only option.
FollowupID:
894105