Thursday, Nov 08, 2018 at 14:40
.
No Batt's, I have not fitted a Hiclone to my vehicles. I just "bag them out" without any real practical assessment. My scientific training and experience in fluid flow tells me that any affect they would produce on the behaviour of air flow in motor vehicle engines would not benefit engine performance but is likely to contribute to a limitation in air flow.
So I am unlikely to invest some $175 for a Hiclone simply to demonstrate its futility.
It is somewhat like flushing a handful of money down the
toilet.... I haven't tried it, but I'm pretty certain of the outcome.
But I have no intention to disparage your observations of vehicle performance after fitting a Hiclone.
I would suggest however that fitting any such device suggests a desire for better
fuel economy and it is possible that awareness may lead to improved driving technique and recording.
A credible assessment would be no less than with a dynamometer and this has been critically performed on Hiclones with findings of nil improvement in
fuel economy or gain in performance. It is perhaps significant that the Hiclone advertising presents pseudo-scientific expressions and non-validated testimonials, but no professional appraisals or dynamometer tests by a recognised laboratory.
I will say this.... I believe that the purveyors of Hiclone understand a lot more about human nature and marketing than they do about fluid dynamics.
Incidentally.... much the same can be said for "cathodic protection" devices promoted for vehicle anti-rust application.
FollowupID:
894659