Friday, Dec 07, 2018 at 16:08
.
Well Gronk, we were talking about a "low amp condition like a solar panel' were we not, so why introduce "higher amp conditions" ?
But let's look at this from a rational engineering aspect rather than hand-on-the-heart Best Practice.
Adam said that he was using 8B&S cable. This has a nominal copper diameter of 4mm and a cross-section of 8mm2. If he were to use a 'Yellow' pin-crimp lug it will just accept that cable. However, such lug has a pin diameter of 2mm. This is actually formed by rolling the flat metal to form the pin and it is hollow, thus the actual cross-sectional area is approx 2mm-sq. Is this reduction from 8mm-sq to 2mm-sq any improvement in current carrying capacity or "good practice"
Further to the above, the addition of the crimp-pin introduces an extra joint in the circuit. Best Practice would prescribe that this crimp should be made using a good-quality ratchet crimp tool. Is it likely that Adam would have such a tool or be prepared to purchase one for just this single job?
Cable sizing on vehicle accessories is almost always selected on minimising circuit volt-drop and results in grossly oversized conductors than is necessary for simple current-carrying capacity. Accordingly, reducing the cable strands within limits is acceptable from an engineering point of view.
EDIT: I just went and measured a couple of 'Yellow' crimp-pin connectors in my stock. Their cable insert hole measured at 3.3mm dia. So if 8B&S cable is actually 4.11mm diameter as my tables nominate, then such connectors would not be suitable here without reducing the strands anyway. What now Gronk?
FollowupID:
895423