Why a pig and not a dog?

Submitted: Friday, Apr 12, 2019 at 13:31
ThreadID: 138153 Views:21503 Replies:11 FollowUps:11
This Thread has been Archived
Of course, when it comes to eating, I'll always go for the pig (ham, pork, bacon... - I've had reliable advice that dog meat tastes horrible).

But when it comes to caravans, particularly larger, heavier ones, why do manufacturers invariably opt for a pig-trailer configuration (wheels in the middle) instead of a dog-trailer configuration (wheels at each end)?

For trucks carrying heavier loads (eg. dirt), the choice is a dog-trailer, and I've found myself wondering, particularly as caravans are becoming available in increasing lengths and weights, should this decision be reconsidered?

Some advantages as I see it:
1- the wheels of the trailer carry the entire load of the trailer, without placing heavy loads on the extreme rear point of the towing vehicle.
2- the front axle can be configured so that the wheels closely follow the wheels of the tow vehicle (ie. reducing cutting-in on corners).
3- no "see-saw effect" which can push the rear of the tow vehicle up and down on rough roads (or even concrete freeways, as we've found with our dual-axle non-load-sharing caravan), reducing comfort for the occupants.
4- better stability when parked (detached from tow vehicle).

Perhaps a dog-trailer is harder to reverse, but surely if one can learn to back a pig-trailer, one could also learn to back a dog-trailer (and plenty of truck drivers can do it, so it is possible).

Or does the stability of the combination (trailer and tow vehicle) become a bigger problem when the weight of the trailer exceeds the weight of the tow vehicle (a situation that is permissible with pig-trailers eg. 2t cars rated to tow 3t or 3.5t caravans)?

Why are caravans invariably built as a pig-trailer configuration rather than a dog-trailer configuration?
Back Expand Un-Read 2 Moderator

Sponsored Links