Tuesday, Jun 22, 2004 at 11:01
No the same principle wouldn't apply.
Well technically it kind of could but in practice it would be very difficult.
27mhz AM/SSB CB was more similar to HF that UHF. It had a wavelength of 10m. UHF is around the 70cm park. Hence there is a lot less margin for error on UHF than there is on 27Mhz. ie 27mhz vs 477mhz.
The twin ariel I have never seen but I would assume it was a dipole. We used to make them out of 10m of coax and a film canister in the middle. Hang them between a tree and the house, they were cheap to make and worked a treat! However dipoles for UHF are a hell of a lot smaller, ie I have one on my surf that just looks like a car radio arial about 30cm tall and just black rubber style job.
The other thing was that with 27mhz we were trying to get "skip", that was the whole aim of make and positioning the ariels however "skip" is practically non existant on UHF. Height is the key. UHF does have somthing similar (
well to the average joe, very different technically) called "induction". Induction normally happens from environmental conditions and tunnels UHF signals down the coast. EG might be able to talk from bunbury to
geraldton. But these are almost impossible to predict and you cannot really set your radio up to take advantage of it as such.
FollowupID:
325448