Track Classifications
Submitted: Wednesday, Jul 27, 2022 at 21:31
ThreadID:
144244
Views:
4743
Replies:
6
FollowUps:
1
This Thread has been Archived
Member - Middo64
I have been using Exploreoz for some time now and think it’s the bees knees. I am far from an expert in it’s use however. On a recent trip I noticed that a lot of the tracks that I was planning on using were actually private roads. I suspect that this a ”feature” of the map set, but I’ll ask anyway. Is there any way to differentiate between public and private roads/tracks. Once I became aware of this it is obvious that the detail is so good that it shows a lot of driveways for properties and through_roads etc. These are great to see in some instances but at other times they can lead you down the wrong path.
Reply By: Member - DW Lennox Head(NSW) - Thursday, Jul 28, 2022 at 05:49
Thursday, Jul 28, 2022 at 05:49
Just out of interest following your post, I expanded Google Maps on a
farm area that I once owned.
It shows similar features that only a land owner would be aware of.
I suspect, that these times, many tracks are picked up from satellite mapping. These
farm tracks would never have been seen otherwise.
Most likely, that is how you have located these private tracks. The onboard navigation system on my 2018 BT50 also shows many of these private tracks.
Cheers
DW
AnswerID:
641285
Reply By: Briste - Monday, Aug 01, 2022 at 22:40
Monday, Aug 01, 2022 at 22:40
I also think highly of EOT, but it's because of this precise issue that I mentioned in another thread I'm looking to complement EOT by another app, so I can get a second opinion about whether a track is a genuinely viable option. For campsites I cross-
check with Wikicamps.
As I understand it, EOT draws its base mapping data from the OSM project, which is the source of these inaccessible tracks . Is that correct?
AnswerID:
641344
Reply By: Nomadic Navara - Tuesday, Aug 02, 2022 at 08:35
Tuesday, Aug 02, 2022 at 08:35
Middo, welcome to the real world. There are no maps where each feature is individually eyeballed. They are taken from aerial photographs (the earlier maps) or satellite imaging. The resolution of those sources is not good enough to pick up locked gates. This applies to Hema maps as
well where they support teams to drive the tracks and verify the remote sensing and thus improve the accuracy. If you are going to use these guidance systems you must also be prepared to live with their shortcomings.
You can do what the others do, use the
forum to ask about a route you intend to use. You will see, from time to time, where others report inaccuracies in the maps, you can also contribute to improve the accuracy of the systems we use.
AnswerID:
641345