Thursday, Aug 07, 2025 at 18:33
.
Peter, You say that I am "Wrong again" but that is not so . AS/NZS 3001.2 has a title of "Electrical installations — Connectable electrical installations and supply arrangements."
Under "1.1 Scope" it includes "Section 1.1.2.2 Recreational vehicles: (a) Caravans, (b) Campervans, (c) Motor homes, (d) etc.etc. and a range of non-recreational vehicles.
My point of argument with Ivan is that he said a "customer's car failed a roadworthy" due to non-conformity for lack of a sealed battery box.
Well he did not say "motorhome" etc, he said a "car" and I very much doubt that the car was not arranged with a 230vac inlet socket in order to qualify as a "Connectable unit".
DISCLAIMER: Leigh makes a point that….."All batteries must be adequately supported and secure. In addition, if fitted in a luggage or occupant compartment, the battery must either be of a type that is fully sealed or be located within a sub compartment which is vented to atmosphere outside the vehicle."
And I can
well believe that. When it comes to electrical matters, Victoria does not necessarily conform to Australian Standards as do other States but "goes it alone". I have had the pleasure(?) of working under Victorian electrical regulations who refused to recognise my South Australian Electrical Workers Certificate and I had to be examined and qualify all over again to qualify for their certification. It is not just Victoria either, even those States that adopt the AS/NZS 3000 often have interpretations and additional requirements. It can make working Commonwealth-wide rather difficult.
Peter, you highlight an image from AS/NZS 3001 that states about "Other vehicles may use this Standard as a guide" which means that although these vehicles are not embraced with the Standard's requirement, it is suggested that they may find the Standard useful as a guide." But not a requirement.
Yes, the "fine print is critical" and I am very familiar with interpreting these Australian Standards (and others) in the performance of my work.
My over-riding point is that Ivan's expression should not be taken at face value without considering the specific circumstance. Ivan is good at throwaway expressions.
Incidentally, this may be a good opportunity to point out that AS/NZS refers to "Lithium ion" batteries and makes no distinction of a LiFePO4 battery. however, I have had communication with the Standards organisation and they consider that a LiFePO4 battery (Lithium Iron Phosphate battery) is a type of lithium-ion battery. So do not consider that a LiFePO4 battery is not excluded from the requirements.
FollowupID:
929678