wind deflectors on roofracks
Submitted: Wednesday, Nov 10, 2004 at 22:42
ThreadID:
17723
Views:
7678
Replies:
8
FollowUps:
9
This Thread has been Archived
Black Jack
I have been giving the old roofrack some attention in preparation for Christmas hols and sat pondering on wind deflectors. The more I pondered the more questions arose. Obviously I have too much time on my hands to spend so much time thinking about a tiny piece of aluminium. But here are my questions anyway. Because it will only be 150mm high will it really work? Does it have to extend the full width of the rack? (My rack curves at the corners. if yes then I will have to support its full width) Is 45 degrees the optimum angle? What are the chances of it creating extra noise, eg whistling, humming, as the wind rush past the outer edges? Should the outer edges be closed in?
The rack looks similar to a TJM rack and very few of these have wind deflectors, which brings me back to the first question, do they work and are they worth the effort?
Thanks in advance
Black Jack
Reply By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Wednesday, Nov 10, 2004 at 22:53
Wednesday, Nov 10, 2004 at 22:53
Black Jack,
I've fitted a big mutha aluminium deflector to
mine in an effort to cut back the howl it makes........it didn't work. As for the angle etc, I made
mine so it's an extension of the windscreen angle. It extends out to the sides of the rack. I only used 4 brackets to support it. It's 3mm thick sheet and the bottom edges are bent in slightly; it doesn't flex etc.
I'm leaving it on cos if nothing else, it helps keep stuff from flying up the trumpets of my air horns (which are situated front left side of the rack).
AnswerID:
83942
Follow Up By: Black Jack - Thursday, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:03
Thursday, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:03
Thanks Roachie,
Looking at your rig, it looks as though your deflector comes down close to the roof. Last night I was having a few problems navigating through the archives and gave up. But one post said 3/4 racks are quieter than full length because they don't interfere with the wind flow off the wind screen. You appear to have attempted to address this. And it still doesn't work! Is your deflector in line with the windscreen angle or is it set back a little?
Thanks
Black Jack
FollowupID:
342838
Follow Up By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Thursday, Nov 11, 2004 at 10:54
Thursday, Nov 11, 2004 at 10:54
Mate, it's set back a couple of inches.
The gap between the bottom of the deflector and the roof is also only an inch or so. I have seen people put a length of rubber along
the gap between the roof and the rack, but I've never spoken to any of them to see what the effect was.
Good luck.
FollowupID:
342857
Reply By: Member - Captain (WA) - Wednesday, Nov 10, 2004 at 23:56
Wednesday, Nov 10, 2004 at 23:56
Hi Black Jack,
I have a length of black poly pipe 160mm dia cut down the centre and cable tied to my ARB rack (just like the previous post) and it cuts out a lot of noise on my GU.
I used the same rack on my 80 series without a deflector and it was very quite. However, I had a sunvisor on that vehicle and it discovered by accident that makes a big difference. My mate borrowed the rack for his 80 and he commented on how noisy it was!!! When I fitted the rack to my GU (no sun visor) I found out just how noisy it is. Thats when I did the pipe splitting trick for a defector.
Sounds like some deflectors work are more effective than others.
Cheers
Captain
AnswerID:
83947
Follow Up By: Black Jack - Thursday, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:26
Thursday, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:26
Captain, your rack sits as far forward as
mine and if the split poly pipe does the trick it may be the simplest and most effective way to go. My original question included what angle should the deflector be at, and the answer seems to be it doesn't matter. It's one of those 'such it and see' things where what works on one vehicle doesn't work on another. One of Thomo's shows where he had two identical Landcruisers in muddy situations. One had a bull bar and the other didn't. The one with the bull bar attacted a lot more spray than the one that didn't, concluding that the bull bar interfered with air flow over the vehicle. If this was true then maybe the interference with air flow starts at the bonnet. (The bull bar stays - a bit of mud does a lot less damage than a one ton bull)
If Roachie's Big Mutha of a deflector didn't work, then the humble poly pipe is the way to go.
Thanks
Black Jack
FollowupID:
342843
Reply By: Peter 2 - Thursday, Nov 11, 2004 at 21:00
Thursday, Nov 11, 2004 at 21:00
I had a 3/4 rack on the 75 series troopy, just started at the point where the roof levels out. I made an aluminium deflector that went from about an inch off the roof to the top of the rack and it made a huge difference in both noise and fuel consumption. Got another 1mpg with it on. The deflector was about 400mm long and on about a 35 deg angle.
I also shortened the legs on the loadrails to get the rack 20mm off the roof.
The rack was composed of three gal loadrails and a gal school fence panel, had a piece of indoor/outdoor carpet over the mesh to protect the rack bag, proved to be very practical and cheap.
AnswerID:
84041
Follow Up By: Black Jack - Thursday, Nov 11, 2004 at 22:53
Thursday, Nov 11, 2004 at 22:53
Peter, the 3/4 rack keeps popping up as the quiet option, and if I go to buy a new rack it will be a 3/4. The bigger the rack, the more I can put up there. But you can't put that much up there and be safe, so why have such a big rack in the first place. Getting the front of the rack away from the wnidscreen airflow seems to be important. I can slide it further back than I do now. My first rack was a half size on Thule rails and sat up high and I don't remember there being a noise problem with it. When this rack was advertised I couldn't let it pass. It sits snug to the roof, but unfortunately has this noise issue. Oh
well, it gives me something to think about in my idle moments. Thanks for your
feedback.
Black Jack
FollowupID:
342930