How many K's are too many on petrol engines?
Submitted: Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 16:20
ThreadID:
18440
Views:
9739
Replies:
14
FollowUps:
13
This Thread has been Archived
Gajm (VIC)
I have narrowed my search on secondhand car down to 2 diffferent models. Looking at Toyota Prado's and Mits Pajero's.
I personaly lean towards the Prado's. But the pricing on the Pajero's get me a later model with a lot less K's, around 90,000. The Prado's in my price range have around 140,000 upwards. It will be a second car for the wife to use, and only rarely, but definitely, used off road. It is also going to clock up a lot more road
miles.
Settled on these models as we want 7-8 seats, petrol and auto, plus they still have a "car" feel to driving them.
Any comments on what else I should be aware of, or checking out when looking at these would be greatly appreicaited.
I also know there is a hell of a lot of "which car to buy" questions, and didn't really want to add one more, but I'm really stuck here, I know a diesel is fine in the high K mark, but not sure of a petrols life....I also want a petrol model because it will be doing frequent small stop start trips.
Thanks
Glenn
Reply By: flappan - Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 16:33
Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 16:33
Its still all about servicing.
You should have no trouble in getting 3 or 400,000 out of a Petrol if its serviced correctly.
A couple of little things though. Not sure of the newer models , but certainly on the earlier PJ's , timing belts needed to be changed every 100,000. Its a PRICK of a job , so , you may even pay to take a vehicle slightly over 100 , rather then one under 100 , if the Timing belt has been changed (assuming same sort of pricing).
AnswerID:
87976
Follow Up By: Gajm (VIC) - Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 18:17
Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 18:17
Thanks for the heads up on that one Flappan, if I do decide on the Pajero I will make sure I
check that out
FollowupID:
346882
Follow Up By: chappobriz - Friday, Dec 10, 2004 at 08:48
Friday, Dec 10, 2004 at 08:48
Yes that 95k service is about $800 I beleive ...ouch!
chappo
FollowupID:
346969
Reply By: pmacks - Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 16:40
Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 16:40
Gajm,
don't know if this helps you with your decision or not but i drive a petrol nissan patrol and i lease this as my company vehicle, my curruent one is a GU 1998 that i was so happy with i bought at the end of the lease it currently has 380,000 klm on the clock and has never missed a beat.
I get it serviced every 10,000 k's by my mechanic ( not nissan ) and he assures me that with regular maintenance i should have no problems for a while yet.
Mine does 90 % on road but it has also done extensive out back touring towing a camper trailer and tows our boat as
well. So in short i would not hesitate to buy a petrol engined car with 140,000k's on the clock if it had been serviced regulary.
Pmacks
AnswerID:
87978
Follow Up By: Gajm (VIC) - Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 18:20
Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 18:20
Thanks pmacks, I would be more than happy if I can get anywhere near that out of whatever I end up with.
FollowupID:
346883
Reply By: Member - Bradley- Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 17:04
Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 17:04
as stated , it all comes down to servicing, i have seen some engines totally knackered at 100k just from pure abuse and neglect, have seen plenty of others at 300 + still running like a charm, due to proper warm ups and generous regular maint. Either model would do the job you want, but i would advise getting the missus to drive them both and make the choice on which one she is comfortable driving.
If it is going to do mainly short stop start work, keep in mind the exhaust will soon rust out, and the oil will get diluted quickly, so it may be worth doing the oil & filter every 5k But definetly no longer than every 10. And remember that these multi cam engines need and love a really good oil, dont be scared of synthetics either.
AnswerID:
87985
Follow Up By: Gajm (VIC) - Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 18:35
Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 18:35
Thanks Bradley. I am going to make sure I follow up on it's service history. And already had the missus
test the Pajero, which after my GQ, and her Charade she loved, I think after a while they all just seem the same to her tho, and she'd be happy with anything. I will probably end up doing the oil and filter every 5000ks, do the GQ anyway, and for the extra few $ in oil and filter it's
well worth what it could potentially save.
FollowupID:
346887
Reply By: Member - Ross P (NSW) - Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 17:16
Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 17:16
Hi Glenn,
You haven't said what your budget is but if it will stretch to 2000/2001 NM Pajero or even a later model then you will truly get that "car" feeling especially with the very clever 5-speed auto that was only in the early model Exceeds, not the GLS (I think).
I sold a 2001 NM Exceed privately in Jan 04 with 120,000 kms on the clock for $33,000. The wholesale price was $30,000.
This car was meticulously maintained, had done a reasonable amount of dirt road and dirt track work but was in excellent condition inside and out.
It drove like new so I dont think 120,00 kms was a problem.
When I advertised it, the phone rang off the hook but once I told people that it had done 120,000 there was as much interest.
If you are interested in a Pajero and want some informed coment,
check out the
forum on www.pajeroclub.com.au. Post a question and see what happens.
AnswerID:
87989
Follow Up By: Gajm (VIC) - Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 18:41
Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 18:41
Nope, that's pushing the budget just a little too far. I was trying to get away with around $25,000- $28,000, obviously the the more I save the better, but if I can save enough I may be able to get my GQ a much needed turbo, and I will have a look at that site thanks
Ross.
FollowupID:
346889
Follow Up By: Member Eric - Friday, Dec 10, 2004 at 07:23
Friday, Dec 10, 2004 at 07:23
Give me a call Gajm on 0418364781 that bugget will get you alot better than 140,000 kms
FollowupID:
346954
Reply By: Member - Tim - Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 18:28
Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 18:28
Hi Gajm,
I have a Pajero in exactly the model you are looking at. It is an NL GLS that is just about to hit 90k. The comments above about needing the timing chain are not quite right as they need to be done at 90k and yes it is probably the most expensive service.
As a general comment though this vehicle has cost me less to maintain over the time I have owned it than any other I have had in the past. I have had Commodore wagons, Falcon wagons, V8 Discovery and now the Paj and the only one that I extended the lease on and then bought rather than paying it out early has been the Paj. It has been to
Cape York, Uluru, Fraser many times, towed the boat, towed the camper trailer and still I don't want to sell it. If you have dogs it is the best car as it has the sliding windows in the back. When the kids were a bit younger it carried half a cub pack around as
well.
The GLS has electric windows, cruise control, 16" alloys, 7 seats, CD stacker all standard. By the time the NL model came out they had sorted out any problems that may have been there in the earlier ones.
Servicing costs are reduced for the Paj over the Prado as the
services are 15k intervals with only an oil change at each 7.5k if you want to do it. I also know of a number of these engines that have gone a lot further than
mine has so far. One of the old 3 litre motors I know of went in excess of 300k and then had a relatively minor rebuild and looks set for another 300k.
The argument about resale value is irrelevant since the Toyotas are overpriced to start with and what you should be looking at is the actual dollar difference between the pruchase price and the selling price as that is how much it will cost you over the time you own it. As an example if I pay 50k for a new car and sell it for 25k two years later, someone else pays 60k and sells theirs for 30k two years later they have still spent 5k more even though they have a better resale value.
I suppose that shows I'm biased towards the Paj doesn't it? I have never understood why someone would pay more for a car that is a copy of the original and somehow get's the unbreakable tag when most of the parts are not as robust. Must be some pretty good marketers there.
Anyway the only car I would possibly change to is the latest turbo diesel Pajero but I can't justify the cost to myself yet as I am not unhappy with what I already have. 10 years warranty is awfully tempting though.
Hope that helps :).
Tim.
AnswerID:
88005
Follow Up By: Gajm (VIC) - Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 19:26
Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 19:26
No thanks Tim, that didn't help at all! I was pretty
well sold on the Prado till then. It isn't a good marketing campaign that has me leaning towards the Prado tho, its also the extra
seat! lol.
I was looking at a few Pajeros today, one was a 99 model GLS with 90,000ks for $25,000. I told a dealer closer to
home who said he could do me a similar 99 GLS with 112,000ks on it for $24,000.....but for today only lol buggered if I rush into spending $24,000 because a salesman says todays price only...if he can do it today he can bloody
well do it next week. If not there are plenty around.
Trouble is I know someone who had a Pajero and had no end of trouble with it. The facts are these tho: it was several years ago, they bought an old model, didn't pay a whole lot for it and did no research on it at all. I think the deciding factor on buying it was it had full electrics which was probably their biggest priority.
But as much as I remind myself all of these things and try to look at the Pajeros fairly, it keeps nagging at me. So it's nice to get positive
feedback on them. As someone stated in a previous post, people rarely post about how
well something is running.
FollowupID:
346896
Follow Up By: Bob of KAOS - Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 20:26
Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 20:26
I've had two Pajeros from new to 100,000km Neither missed a beat. Brilliant vehicles on and off road. I love them. Prado's are an inferior copy and sell
well because there a lot of sheep out there.
FollowupID:
346907
Reply By: allanmac856 - Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 22:48
Thursday, Dec 09, 2004 at 22:48
Agree with Tim. I also have a NL GLS & couldn't be happier. When I started looking for a 4wd, the Patrol was my 1st choice until the wife sat in in 1 & said 'stick it up my jumper' 2 big, uses 2 much fuel etc etc. Never really considered a Pajero, but saw this really nice 1, wife was happy, couldn't complain. It does everything I want; towing my ski boat, off road capabilities are pretty good & not bad on fuel. 1 think to consider, Prado is constant 4wd wheras Pajero is not, meaning higher fuel consumption with Prado. Admit that interior is more 'upmarket' with Prado, arguably better resale, but is so much more expensive for IMO, little if any better vehicle. Mate has Prado & uses far more fuel when travelling to same destination.
Mine has done 120k with no problems & expect to do 200+ with no problems, if serviced regularily.
Cheers
allanmac856
AnswerID:
88066
Reply By: bushfix - Friday, Dec 10, 2004 at 11:31
Friday, Dec 10, 2004 at 11:31
G'day Gajim,
I went through the 7-8
seat fourby thing. We are four kids and two adults. I am very pleased we went for the Prado, ending up with a 96 GXL, auto, petrol, 140k km. As Eric said, with you budget, you could get lower than 140k. There are a lot out there that have never been off road and have been
well serviced. We only have one vehicle and it works very
well for us during the week and weekends/hols. And yes, the eighth
seat certainly comes in handy. Give Eric a call I reckon, you might even pick up a Grande.
Jeremy.
AnswerID:
88136
Reply By: Mal58 - Friday, Dec 10, 2004 at 12:00
Friday, Dec 10, 2004 at 12:00
Gajm,
There is a lot of slanging about the Prado being a copy of the Pajero etc. Some of it is possibly true, some not.
However, if you are after seating, make sure that you sit in the middle row of seats including the centre
seat and see which is more comfortable.
I have 3 kids and we did this, and in the end we bought a 98 Prado, as the Pajero middle row of seats (even though it has three
seat belts) are in my families opinion shaped only for two people, not three.
I note a similar thing with the newer 4wd's and I have sat in the current Nissan Patrol, the current Prado, and the current Pajero, and found that most centre positions in the middle row would be very uncomfortable for any period of time.
Food for thought.
Cheers,
Mal
AnswerID:
88144
Follow Up By: Member - Ross P (NSW) - Friday, Dec 10, 2004 at 13:20
Friday, Dec 10, 2004 at 13:20
This is very good point. I have an NP Exceed 2004. I find the third
seat to be very uncomfortable and it's only for two. It's pretty useless for adults and I would think not suitable for children for a long trip.
Can't say about other vehicles.
Not a problem for me as there's only me and my wife now. We even take the second row seats out when we travel.
FollowupID:
347024