GME TX4400, TX3400 or ICOM 400PRO
Submitted: Sunday, Dec 19, 2004 at 18:29
ThreadID:
18696
Views:
10552
Replies:
10
FollowUps:
14
This Thread has been Archived
breno
Im looking at getting a UHF, either a GME TX4400, TX3400 or an icom 400PRO but am unsure which to get. Any
feedback or advise on any of these would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Reply By: Member - Chrispy (NSW) - Sunday, Dec 19, 2004 at 18:56
Sunday, Dec 19, 2004 at 18:56
I'm not sure how many people here have actually had experience with all three... so I think that all you'll get are users' opinions on their own.
I have the 3400 and have found it to be a
well-featured and reliable radio. Easy to mount, given the remote head - and really the only one I could have mounted as I have a dash which would not accept a typical DIN-sized radio.
I have heard great reports on the Icom too... and may
well get an Icom portable to complement the in-car.
Here's my radio and the way I have mounted it: [ View Image]
AnswerID:
89471
Follow Up By: breno - Sunday, Dec 19, 2004 at 19:15
Sunday, Dec 19, 2004 at 19:15
Thanks Chrispy,
Thats the trouble, hard to compare all three i guess. I havnt been able to find much in the way of reviews on any of them, so i know only what the manufactures say ...
cheers,
breno
FollowupID:
348358
Follow Up By: Member - Willie , Epping .Syd. - Monday, Dec 20, 2004 at 09:35
Monday, Dec 20, 2004 at 09:35
Hi Chrispy ,
How do you do that (View Image ) thingy ???
It's very handy - I had to upload a picture of my GPS mounting setup to "my rig" photos to show a fella how I'd done it - your way is much better !
Thanks ,
Willie .
FollowupID:
348400
Follow Up By: Member - Chrispy (NSW) - Monday, Dec 20, 2004 at 10:30
Monday, Dec 20, 2004 at 10:30
Hi Willie :)
Just follow the instructions as the bottom of this page when you post. "For images...."
If you have your image stored on an external server - like a photo gallery, you basically just get its properties and look for the URL...i.e.
http://blahblahblah... and use that where it says to in the link below instead of the "
http://path". Remember to put in the double quotes.....
Cheers
Chrispy
FollowupID:
348402
Follow Up By: Baz (NSW) - Monday, Dec 20, 2004 at 11:12
Monday, Dec 20, 2004 at 11:12
Willie you have to have image storage (ie) photobucket, 4wdlinks.com and so on then you can post photos, go here.
[ View Image]
this is what you post,
img src="
http://domain.com/image_path"
I left out the these arrowsat either end of this what is above goes in between those arrows.
FollowupID:
348405
Follow Up By: Baz (NSW) - Monday, Dec 20, 2004 at 11:16
Monday, Dec 20, 2004 at 11:16
these arrows go either end.
FollowupID:
348407
Reply By: Bob Y. - Qld - Sunday, Dec 19, 2004 at 20:38
Sunday, Dec 19, 2004 at 20:38
breno,
You couldn't go wrong with any of them. We have both TX4400 and TX3400 in a couple of vehicles, and it comes down this: If you're over 50, and need glasses, get a 4400. If you own a 100 series tojo, get the remote 3400, because of its compact size, fit anywhere. The performance of both is equal.
We don't use any ICOM 400's, but have similar Icom sets in a repeater, and it has performed without fault, in extreme conditions, for over 5 years. We do use Icom 40S hand helds which perform
well, and have never needed repair. They are a little "deaf", compared to GME TX6000's.
Finally, I'd go with GME, they're made in Oz.
Hooroo...
AnswerID:
89487
Follow Up By: breno - Sunday, Dec 19, 2004 at 21:38
Sunday, Dec 19, 2004 at 21:38
Thanks for the advice, im only 18 and eye sight is no issue. As far as space goes, the UHF is for my fj 45 troopie so not really an issue either.
Cheers,
Breno
FollowupID:
348372
Reply By: Jim-Bob - Sunday, Dec 19, 2004 at 20:43
Sunday, Dec 19, 2004 at 20:43
G'day breno
I've had a GME TX4200 in my 4runner for 3yr's and has not let us down in any way at all. I would assume that the TX4400 would be a better radio.
I have now got a 2001 TD Prado and have, because of the physical size, installed an Icom 400PRO in the tray just below the ashtray.
As far as comparing the two I can only go by the performance around the local area of the Hunter Valley as we havent yet been outback in the Praydo.
As for user friendly goes the GME is that far in front it's not funny.
The screen is a lot larger on the GME and much easier to read.
The GME has a better signal strenght meter, good for narrow tracks in wooded areas like
Cape York.
the GME has larger push buttons and knobs, better for no look opperation
whilst driving.
I could go on with more but won't, you will have study the pro's and con's of each radio to make a choice.
The reason I got the 400 was simply size,I also have a hand held 5watt Uni Den we use in conjuction with the in car radio.
Safe travells and Merry Christmas
Jim-Bob
AnswerID:
89490
Follow Up By: breno - Sunday, Dec 19, 2004 at 21:46
Sunday, Dec 19, 2004 at 21:46
Thanks Jim-Bob,
Im thinking the tx4400 is the way to go. Its nice to hear the GME is easier to use than the icom having played with a mates icom 400pro once breifly, and finding it some what fiddley.
cheers,
breno
FollowupID:
348374
Reply By: Tuff60 - Sunday, Dec 19, 2004 at 20:46
Sunday, Dec 19, 2004 at 20:46
I bought the Icom at the same time as I got 4 GME TX3400 for mates, I was originaly getting a TX3400, but the dealer did a great price on the Icom because I was buying 5 radios. I chose the Icom mostly for how neat it fits the 60 series under a standard DIN radio. Each has its own features but the TX3400 is easiest to use for selcall and scan functions, the only Icom feature which I think is better is user programable 88 recieve only channels(read the instructios twice and keep them in the car) compared to the TX3400 dealer programable recieve only channels.
No problems with any of them, seam to send and recieve about the same. Quality of both is great but you will find that the Icom is built to be manhandled and abused, definately comercial quality, I recon you could use the handset to hammer in tent pegs, they're that tough.
As for portables, Icom is the bee's knees, I still have 2 15(or thereabouts) year old IC40 40 channel handhelds still work like new and they have had a hard life. Just bought a new IC40s($400 with spare battery, couldn't resist.) and so far think they're as good.
AnswerID:
89491
Follow Up By: breno - Sunday, Dec 19, 2004 at 22:24
Sunday, Dec 19, 2004 at 22:24
Thanks Tuff60,
So with the icom, is reprograming the channels a bit of a challenge?
FollowupID:
348380
Follow Up By: Tuff60 - Monday, Dec 20, 2004 at 01:16
Monday, Dec 20, 2004 at 01:16
Breno, as I said if you want to change the recieve only channels you need the manual everytime. If I stay anywhere for a while I add the local emergency channels and write down where and what they are, have the list on the back of the instruction book. Was also told a while ago by a CFA guy that as the Icom has a 25 watt traciever in it, only running at a fifth(max legal citizen UHF) it should last at the full 5 watt forever, apparently others have been known to record only 3 watts after a year or so. Just what I was told, no idea on it being fact, but he did say he did communications for some or part of the CFA and sounded convincing, and he had the icom in his LC.
FollowupID:
348387
Follow Up By: breno - Monday, Dec 20, 2004 at 09:26
Monday, Dec 20, 2004 at 09:26
Ok thanks,
Thats an interesting point you make/theory you raise on the life spans.
Thanks again for your help,
breno
FollowupID:
348398