Friday, Jan 07, 2005 at 22:52
Slyonnet, your followup is very short on logic. I made no mention of banning 4wds from city areas. Read it again and you may see the point - ownership of 4wds restricted to people who live in rural areas. There is absolutely no logic in banning cars from the country if 4wd ownership is not allowed to city dwellers. Your point is similar to saying that if vehicles not carrying chains in the boot are banned from alpine areas, then vehicles carrying chains in the boot are banned from city areas.
Try going off road some time and you'll see that there are many (not few) people who are irresponsible and unaware out there. Try listening for chainsaws hacking into the bush for firewood,
check a stream or two for pollution from soap and shampoo, listen for people running generators to light a 60watt globe,
check for campfires left smouldering (many major fires have been started this way) See how many people try to climb the "widow maker" at Wonnangatta - regardless of the previous tragic loss of life at this site, have a look at the many "bog holes" caused by people who
test their vehicles in mud, ask around and see how many people are carrying recovery gear (my policy is now that my snatch strap is for my vehicle after ruining 3 straps on others and not even being offered any compensation. If a bogged vehicle wants to be snatched out, they supply the strap. And so the list can go on - basic communications, good maps, emergency food supplies etc, etc, etc .... Locals in the
Licola won't even leave town without $1,000 up front to retrieve vehicles of irresponsible drivers. They are so sick of the time and effort and danger involved. My mate up that way ruined a hand winch recovering a city bloke's vehicle. The city bloke got his details and assured him that the winch would be replaced. That was 8 years ago and he's still waiting!! I'm sure that by now you've changed your
views on the number of "responsible" drivers who visit the bush once in a blue moon.
FollowupID:
350659