Premium vs ordinary unleaded
Submitted: Monday, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:49
ThreadID:
19217
Views:
3235
Replies:
10
FollowUps:
2
This Thread has been Archived
D-Jack
Hi all
I hav just recently (about 3 tanks full) started running premium in our little Holden Nova twin cam (1989) but not EFI. The result is that I am getting at least 10% better fuel economy out of it. Given that the premium costs only about 5% more, It seems to be a win win situation. I think the car is running better too, idling smoother. Now getting about 9.8l/100km from a tank, and that is running with the a/c on a lot of the time because of the baby. All is around town stuff too. Not bad I say.
My question is though, are there any drawbacks? If not, why are we running standard unleaded at all, assuming most cars will get better economy and running/performance? I also understand it burns better and produces less pollution. Almost no-one according to the servo guy I spoke to uses premium (unless in high performance or really late model expensive vehicles requiring it) It may be that people can't look past the lower price of ordinary unleaded, can't see the longer term savings than at the time at the pump.
I know that premium is unavailable at many remote spots, but for around town it sounds like the go.
D-Jack
Reply By: GO_OFFROAD - Monday, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:59
Monday, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:59
Really, its just another side to the toyota/nissan debate, and although the pain of the purchase price is long forgotten when the benifits of quality remain, the average person in the street cant see past the up front cost.
Otherwise they wouldnt bombard us with price in all out junk mail, tv ads, etc.
When i ran optimax or synergy in my HSV's I averaged 70km more per tank, which made the same saving you are looking at from your vehicle, and my 4.5 petrol 78 series also returned similar figures in savings when running on premium.
AnswerID:
92137
Follow Up By: Uppy - Member - Monday, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:19
Monday, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:19
I agree with,OF ROAD.Ive got a gq patrol 4,2 efi,I only use pulp and get the same results as OF ROAD .
regards uppy
FollowupID:
350950
Reply By: XS Challenger - Tuesday, Jan 11, 2005 at 00:01
Tuesday, Jan 11, 2005 at 00:01
I have used PULP
Caltex Vortex and BP Ultimate and I would have to say no difference. the two tanks before use where slightly higher use at 14.8l/100 then with the PULP it went down to 14.4l/100, the first tank of regular after the PULP went up to 15.2l/100 but after that it settled back to the normal 13.5l/100.
The consumption is way too high for my vehicle anyway and that will be getting looked at at next service.
Here is something most people don't know about the PULPs.
I have a new Motorbike that has to run on PULP of 96 or better octane rating.
I usually run BP Ultimate or
Caltex Vortex. Anyway when I had a running problem (due to water around the spark plug apparently) the mechanic asked which PULP I use. Apparently the Shell fuel is no good for motorbikes unless they have been specifically tuned to cope with the heavier fuel.
At least that was what I was told.
AnswerID:
92304