Wednesday, Feb 09, 2005 at 23:39
Hi Paul,
I went through a similair decision when I ugraded my 1HZ 80 series. At the end of the day, you will be happy with either choice, but I am glad I went the 3.0TD.
As for the DX vs ST, I reckon resale price will be the same % wise considering it was cheaper in the first place. Plus I MUCH prefer the 16" rims, only advantage for 17" is marginally improved on-road but disadvatage offroad with higher cost and less choice. However, I wouldn't be without my power antenae, windows and mirrors etc... after so many years with a standard 80 series. Must be getting soft as I get older...
As for 3.0TD vs 4.2TD,
well there is SO much talked about here but basically everyone is happy with what they chose for their own reasons. The 4.2TD has a proven reliability record, while the 3.0TD is probably just as good now (waiting for the response to that!!!), just the series II was questionable. But drive the 3.0TD and 4.2TD back to back and you will see there is no comparison.
The 4.2TD has oodles of bottom end umph but hasn't much puff as the revs rise. In comparison the 3.0TD has soft bottom end but certainly gets up and boogies. If you are going to be towing, get the auto 3.0TD, add a Dtronic and you will have one of the best tow vehicles around (and thats BEFORE price is taken into account).
I have a manual Dtronic 3.0TD and still amazed at how
well it tows my 1.6T offroad van. Being a manual, I notice the lack of bottom end, but with the Dtronic you have over 350Nm at ~1250rpm, and a peak torque of 420Nm at 2,000rpm. Thats stump pulling torque in anyones books. And once you are travelling at 100km/hr, floor tha accelerator and you will overtake with ease. Its something that the 4.2TD cannot do (in standard form).
Factor in better fuel economy for the 3.0TD and one wonders why anyone buys the 4.2TD! But thats because once you are in 4WD low range territory the bottom end of the 4.2TD is legendary. While I reckon the 3.0TD is good, the 4.2TD is better the worse the terrain gets. But put them side by side on
the beach and the 3.0TD is in its territory.
As for reliability, while the 4.2TD has the runs on the board, the latest incarnation the TD6, now has electronic control on the fuel pump, EGR valve and an intercooler smaller than the 3.0TD (from the 2.8TD). But still, I cannot think of a more reliable vehicle. But while many have an unnatural fear of airflow meters, electronic fuel pumps, ECU's etc... they are very relaible, but not bush fixable. I reckon you have more chance of a 2 cent widgit that is common to both vehicles breaking than a major electronic failure, but thats just my opinion. Ultimately you have more chance of repairing a 4.2TD in the scrub than a 3.0TD.
Now unfortunately virtually all of us spend out time dreaming how we want to be offroad while driving to and from work. Most people spend at least 80% of their kms on-road, and I'm talking
about us here, not the shopping trolley 4WD's that that do 99.999% on-road. One thing that I think just about everyone agrees on is that the 3.0TD is much more responsive for the daily grind.
Anyway, after this long winded reply, I reckon you will be happy what ever you choose and thats all that really counts.
Cheers
Captain
PS. Go the white!!! While the metallic colours look great, they are a bugger for scratches in comparison.
Cheers
Captain
AnswerID:
97582
Follow Up By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Thursday, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:47
Thursday, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:47
G'day Captain,
For once in my life (hahahahaha) I agree with EVERY word you have said...
Good one mate....spot on.
Cheers
Roachie
FollowupID:
356189