Tuesday, May 24, 2005 at 14:35
G'day Banjo and all others,
Yes mate, I'm here; just been doing a bit of work for a change!!!
Those who've been on here for a while know only too
well my feelings on this issue. I do try not to be too one-eyed......hell I've even said on here that Toyotas are okay as a 4x4, jus over-priced (IMHO) and getting too soft in the latest models (as are the Nissans as
well).
I chose my 4.2 over the 3L after having owned a 4.2 GQ with a Safari turbo and did almost 300,000klm in it. When I was looking to upgrade to a GU, the only one I could
test drive was a 3L auto (2000 model). Boy, did it get up and boogey!!!! I had to be careful I didn't spin the wheels on the
test drive......so used to having to stick the Bluney into the right pedal and get a half-baked response (by comparison).
Anyway, I looked under the bonnet of the 3L, saw that there was bugga-all room for my normal set of accessories etc; saw all the electronic gizmos; saw that horrible waste of space under the radiator's cowling and most of all I shuddered at the thought of all that weight being managed by a 4 cylinder donk. I know, I know....I paranoid for no good reason, the troubles of the early 3L seem to have been cured and it goes really
well. So why do I still prefer the 4.2????
Okay, I'm no mechanic (I'm a pen-pusher/keyboard puncher). But I do have a modicum of knowledge of how the ol' girl functions. I can change belts, hoses, radiators, fuel filters, oil & air filters etc. I can pull the injectors out if need be. I've had the whole air intake from the inner guard to the turbo off at different times (and have never seen one single solitary electric wire going to any part of it (IE: no electronic gizmos to get covered in dust or fine oil particulates which then tell some hidden computer chip that the world as it is known to be is going to come to an end!!!).
I know
mine has less power than a 3L with a chip (probably even without a chip). I do not drive a 4x4 cos I want to get from A to B in the fastest possible time, via the least hospitible track. When we go on club trips I usually volunteer to be tail end charlie so that I don't feel that I'm holding somebody else up.
BUT........I would back my ol' 4.2 against anybody else's vehicle in our club when it comes to it's reliablity and ability to get to our chosen destination.
Sure, I have modified
mine heavily with slightly raised
suspension, 3" exhaust, larger radiator, front Air Locker etc......just like a lot of other blokes have done.
Now as far as fuel economy is concerned, my experience may be worth considering. We went to
Cape York late last year. My mate who has a 3L auto Patrol used virtually identical amount of fuel at each fill-up stop we did. We both had camper trailers about the same weight (my Ultimate and his Trak Shak), but
mine has a larger frontal area given my roof rack etc.
Hope this helps,
Roachie
FollowupID:
368805