Wednesday, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:00
Hi Derek,
We fitted a
snorkel to our NH Pajero, mainly because of the large number of
water crossings that we were doing whilst living in the NT. Originally had no intention of doing so but soon realised the merits. Air intake was level with headlights and beside the radiator. Have a look at a Paj and you'll see that means the intake was quite low so even on a relatively "shallow"
water crossing, we risked taking in a gutsful of
water. Electronic airflow sensor at the back of the intake line could easily receive
water damage. Replacement cost ~$600 (more than the cost of a
snorkel). After several
water crossings and before the
snorkel was fitted, we removed this sensor and could see evidence of
water having travelled that far up the intake tube.
On many occasions, we had
water completely over the bonnet, far enough to get a bit of
water dripped onto our feet thru the vents just in front of the windscreen. We are not cowboys and never undertook these crossings just because they were there. Also, it is possible to take in
water during a shallow crossing if you drop into a hole or on an inital steep decent into the
creek etc before the nose of the vehicle levels out. As for the car interior, we never got more than a little bit of seepage around the bottom of the doors and a few drops from the vents as mentioned above. Just stopped straight after each crossing and mopped up with a towel. No damage.
I second comments already made about dust. As for power, we never noticed any difference to the before and after
snorkel. Fuel economy hard to say as we had a roof rack fitted at the same time so whilst we did have higher consumption afterwards, couldn't say how much, if any, was attributed to the
snorkel.
One other point though, the
snorkel did have a negative impact on the resale value of our Paj when we sold it. Dealers don't like 'em cause buyers don't like 'em. Hints too much of a 4WD that might have actually done some off-road work...God forbid!!!
:o) Melissa
AnswerID:
8790