Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 17:07
Ok.
Hope everyone remebers that you wanted portable! Obviously, all panels are flat and can be stored. There are fold up / briefcase open/shut with little stands types might be ones that were the high price you were quoted.
There are ploy and Amophorous (Can't speel), types. The AM type give out more but wear out over time and don't do
well in the heat - most portable types are AM. The polys are better, last longer, and are much better at heat levels.
Previous replies, mention about morning and facing sun and stuff. This is fact: The energy output stated on the panel will be less than what you get. IE: if it says 4amps then you will get (in real life 4.4amps), they are all under rated for legal reasons. But AM types will give upto 30% more, but then go gradually lower (maybe 4 months), as they 'settle in'.
So if you have an 80watt panel which way do you face it? They only get peak power if they are directly FULL ON IN THE FACE of the sun. That's why some rich people have Solar Trackers. But obvioulsy in your case you don't need that - I'm only making a point.
You should only pay for a 80W Ploy panel $600. Get 3 and have one facing the morning sun, the other to collect the midday and the third to collect the setting sun.
if you are around the area, then moving all 3 to face the sun full on as time goes by, then great!
But if you don't want to be moving them all the time, then i suggest the 3 panels. Don't forget that if you get ONE cloudy day, then maybe judge about having a 4th panel to cater for that.
AM type panels are better for cloudy days, but Poly does ok anyway within reason.
That way you cannot go wrong and should meet your power requirements.
As for regulators, thickness of cable and quality of batterys, they all have a percentage of loss and as any good solar guy will tell you - your loss with be at LEAST 50%, for a final power given (what is should give you), to what you need (What you actually get out at the end).
If you have the money and don't care about longivity and a bit lower energy due to 35-40C° days and a working usable life of 10 years, then go AM type. If you want
good all round performance go the Poly type, but i am not sure about the 'portable' side of it.
Lastly, with your roof top quote, just get 2 80w polys and make a frame.
Hope that helps.
Alan.
AnswerID:
124454
Follow Up By: Jimbo - Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 18:13
Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005 at 18:13
Alan,
A couple of errors in that.
It is poly panels that do not like the heat. Clearly written on the back of Kyocera brand poly panels is they lose 20% efficiency over 25 C. Amorphous panels love the heat.
Amorphous panels operate at 10 to 15% ABOVE their rated output for the first 8 weeks of continuous use and then revert to their actual output. They do not "wear out".
Also amorphous panels are not a sensitive to being angled directly at the sun as poly panels.
Hope this clears a few things up.
Cheers,
Jim.
FollowupID:
379370
Follow Up By: Alan Southport QLD - Wednesday, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:10
Wednesday, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:10
Jim,
Yes i can see some errors, The Polys are not as tolerant to the sun, but i thought the temperature was higher than 25°C, around the mid 30's to low 40's.
I was being conservative about he Rated output in the first settling in period.
As for the life span, i was not aware that any AM types have a warranty - but the polys do.
In your conclusion as for the better panels to buy (And AM types are cheaper), then why would anybody buy the Poly types here in Australia where 80% of land (particulary the outback) gets way beyond 25°C?
If the AM types are cheaper, better shade tollerant, higher output, do not wear out, and are not as affected by the higher temperatures, then why choose the Ploy type of panel?
Cheers,
Alan.
FollowupID:
379471
Follow Up By: Alloy c/t - Wednesday, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:04
Wednesday, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:04
Alan , I have and use both types of panel , a 64w UNISOLAR [same as Jimbos] and a 120w KYOCERA , heat issues aside , the main difference is SIZE , the 64 unisolar gives out in near perfect conditions 3.7amps ,its SIZE =1366x742x47 and weighs 8kg ,,,the 120 kyocera in the same conditions 7.1amps yet the SIZE is not much bigger at 1425x652x52 and 11kg , pay 2/3 the $ for 1/2 the amps yet the same size , each to their own.
FollowupID:
379491
Follow Up By: Jimbo - Wednesday, Aug 10, 2005 at 19:17
Wednesday, Aug 10, 2005 at 19:17
All very interesting and like everything there are no absolute rights and wrongs.
See post 25476 and the response by Collyn Rivers, the Guru on this topic. He has forgotten more than most of us know.
Alloy your comments on the Kyocera vs U/s are valid in perfect conditions. My understanding is that in partial shade or overcast conditions a poly panel stops dead, whereas an amorphous panel still gives some output. Therefore if you forget to move your poly panel and 10% of it is shaded it stops, whereas the amorphous panel in the same circumstances will produce 90% of its output.
As you said, each to his own.
Cheers,
Jim.
FollowupID:
379548