Wednesday, Jul 27, 2005 at 11:55
It is possible that the current interest in inverter/three-stage battery charger setups follows my Tech Notes article that was published The Wanderer (the CMCA's monthly journal) some half year ago. I have also described and suggested it on several Forums.
It is primarily of benefit in motorhomes that have 24-volt vehicle electrics and 12-volt house electrics, but is
well worth considering otherwise.
Before eloborating, I'd like to comment on a number of issues raised in this thread.
That conventional lead acid batteries rarely charge beyond 70% in vehicles is not a myth. Whilst is true that 13.8 volts will eventually bring a battery close to full charge the time required is virtually weeks. Several battery makers state that caravan batteries are typically unlikely to exceed 65%.
The 70% voltage limitation is deliberate as it safeguards batteries against overcharging on very long trips or non-stop usage. Starting is not compromised as the system is designed accordingly.
In practice (as opposed to theory) most car batteries do charge to approx 70%. They discharge to about 67.5% whilst starting. Because they fall to below 9 so volts whilst doing so (and there is thus a huge diffetential between battery and alternator voltage), the energy used is typically replaced by the alternator within a one-two minutes. Whilst the charging limitationm does not affect starting, any parallel charged battery has the same limitation forced upon it.
Most conventional paralleling charging methods work reasonably
well but are usually a compromise if disparate batteries are involved - as their charge acceptance characteristics are almost certainly different. Rotronics up-market device gets around this - but is very costly.
The inverter/charging system is most economic where an inverter and/or mains battery charger is needed anyway, but is worth considering generally.
It advantage is that no modifications need to be made to the vehicle (the inverter is just another appliance) and that the charger can be set to provide the optimum charging regime for the battery.
It needs neither humungous
inverters or heavy cabling. The charger needs not be huge as long as it is a three-stage unit that provides constant current charging.
Charging a battery at (say) a constant 20 amps is far better than most alternator/regulators can do - so a 20-25 amp charger is adequate unless you have a heap of battery capacity. Driving the charger requires (at most) a 500-watt inverter, connected by cables capable of carrying about 27.5 amps.
I have one minor reservation re using this technique with a trailer. And that is the legality of running a low voltage (240-volts ac) cable between towing vehicle and trailer. There appears to be nothing in AS/NZS 3000:2000 or 30001:2001 that covers this. Whilst I am a professional engineer with electrical engineering experience I am not a licensed electrician - and those I have discussed this with are as equally unclear.
I have no hesitation in suggesting it otherwise. An increasing number of motorhome owners are using it with every success.
I will arrange to post the CMCA feature on my own website asap.
Collyn Rivers
AnswerID:
122266
Follow Up By: Ray Bates - Wednesday, Jul 27, 2005 at 19:38
Wednesday, Jul 27, 2005 at 19:38
Dear Collyn,
It would appear that you are thinking on the same lines as me regarding the inverter/charger system. My DSB is mounted in a rather large metal box on the drawbar of my caravan and has adequate spare space for an inverter and a charger. I would though not consider running 240V all the way from the car and all the conversion would be done in this box. I already have a 150watt inverter but my charger only gives out 15amps which according to your calculations is not sufficient. I already have 18mm2 (4Australian Standard Wire Gauge) running from the car to the caravan so voltage drop should not be a problem. The toolbox is seeled and lockable and the length of 240v cable would be very short and nontouchable except for maintenance.
Thank you for your comments
FollowupID:
377539
Follow Up By: drivesafe - Thursday, Jul 28, 2005 at 18:31
Thursday, Jul 28, 2005 at 18:31
Hi Ray, with the size of cable you already have, I would lay money that if you tested the two ways of charging your rear battery that you would not only charge the battery quicker by simply connecting the cable straight to the battery, you would ultimately use far less power and as such reduce wear on you alternator.
Using the inverter/charger set up will work but will take longer, require far more power compered to the amount of power you end up storing and as stated, you are just making your alternator work harder for no advantage over a conventional system. The inverter/charger set up is just overkill with no real gain.
One more point, some motor homes may use the Inverter/charger set but I supply auxiliary battery charging gear to a number of automotive companies, including Australia’s largest motor
home manufacture and I can assure you, even with the huge
inverters and battery chargers that these vehicles come with, nothing charges the banks of batteries that some of the vehicles have, quicker than the voltage coming directly from the alternator.
Cheers
FollowupID:
377762
Follow Up By: drivesafe - Thursday, Jul 28, 2005 at 19:27
Thursday, Jul 28, 2005 at 19:27
Ray here is suggestion for you.
If you really want to use the Inverter/charger set but want to get the quickest charge then when you know you are going to be doing a fair few hours driving.
For the first two or three hours ( depending on how discharged the battery is ) run the cable straight to the battery then after that connect up the Inverter/charger.
You will get the bulk of you charge at any time in the first few hours and doing it this way will also continue the charge at a high voltage off the charger.
Still, unless you have an inverter and charger already, installing an additional battery in the van would be far more efficient and cost effective set up.
Cheers.
FollowupID:
377770