Mitsubishi Challenger
Submitted: Tuesday, Oct 25, 2005 at 21:08
ThreadID:
27564
Views:
16413
Replies:
7
FollowUps:
2
This Thread has been Archived
Martin W
I have recently bought a 1999 Mitsubishi Challenger, has anyone got any feed back in relation to their good and bad points. Also I'm looking for a secondhand roof rack to suit, has anyone got any info re secondhand traders that sell the type of rack/basket set up I would need?
Reply By: DP - Tuesday, Oct 25, 2005 at 21:26
Tuesday, Oct 25, 2005 at 21:26
Hi Martin,
there's a few on this site that will give you good detailed comments... eg Camper, Bitsumishin Mike etc...
I too have a 99 model and have generally found it to be a good all round 4wd. I have travelled along the
Border Track, Ngarkat,
Big Desert region without any problems. With trips to
Kangaroo Island and the
Flinders Ranges planned in the not too distant future.
The only modifications (term used very loosely) I have made are a set of All Terrain tyres and cargo barrier.
some bad points - ithe 4wd activation light often does not turn off after playing in mud. 4wd has disengaged but the light flashes for a while - I think until the switch in the transfer case has dried out some what. Not a major gripe though.
I have had a few mechanical headaches due to ignorant mechanics, so be sure of who you get to work on your 4wd - especially when getting the 100,000km service done. The cheapest quote does not always mean the cheapest price!
I bought a good second hand set of Rola industrial roof racks here in
Adelaide from Roof Rack City and can recomend them for price and service for both racks and cargo barrier.
In all I reckon the Challenger is a good all round entry level 4wd. Enjoy your new toy!
Dan
AnswerID:
136339
Follow Up By: MichaelN - Tuesday, Oct 25, 2005 at 22:26
Tuesday, Oct 25, 2005 at 22:26
I had that same problem in the 97 Triton i had. After moving from 4H to 2H, the 4WD light would stay on. Had to stop, switch off ignition and restart to clear the light. More of an annoyance then anything.
FollowupID:
390164
Reply By: slyonnet - Wednesday, Oct 26, 2005 at 14:37
Wednesday, Oct 26, 2005 at 14:37
Martin,
I am very happy with
mine. It performed
well everywhere I took it so far. It's particularly great in sand. The only drawback I found off-road is the factory tyres when driving on rocky tacks and will fit some AT tyres when the factory ones will be worn out and money allows me to. Otherwise, it could do with a foot rest next to the clutch pedal (I have a manual).
If you do a search on this site you'll find that people are generally (if not always) happy with the performance and report that they followed landcruisers and patrols without difficulties in extreme areas.
Regarding the roof rack, beware of some load limitations for the roof. Mitsubishi rate the roof for 50kg max, which leaves you with around 35kg once you substract the weight of the bars and tray. That's why I haven't gone ahead with it (yet). Also they had problems with some models (cant remember which year 98 or 99?) with the roof bar attachment point braking off. Again there are several posts here on that subject.
have fun,
SLY.
AnswerID:
136472
Reply By: Member - t0me (WA) - Wednesday, Oct 26, 2005 at 17:16
Wednesday, Oct 26, 2005 at 17:16
Bugger Sly you just put the mockers on my roof-top-tent.
I have an early 2000 model. Leaf at the back still like yours and no LSD.
The LSD in the is apparently excellent. The travel in the wheels isn't that good and on a 4x4 course I did it didn't make it up either of the two extreme bits I threw it at (one mega sanddune and a nasty bit of narly
hill inland). That was because of the wheel travel in both cases.
Its pretty economical to run being a 3L v6 (better than same year in pathfinder or jackaroo though the pathy seems to perform offroad better).
The engine is apparently good for LPG conversion which would make it even better for economy, though you would need to relocate the spare.
Its comfortable as you probably know now already, and the height adjustment of the drivers side suits the missus.
I'm totally happy with
mine, exactly what I wanted, something thats excellent 95% of the time on the road and which can handle some fun off road the rest of the time. Very little compromise considering I use it mainly as daily transport.
Also, for a car its age, I think it looks pretty good.
Don't forget the timing chain in the 100k service. Adds heaps to the bill, but its one of those things you definately don't want to have go wrong.
AnswerID:
136490
Follow Up By: DP - Thursday, Oct 27, 2005 at 22:34
Thursday, Oct 27, 2005 at 22:34
Adding to your comment tOme, ensure that the correct tension (torque) is applied by the mechaninc doing the 100,000 service.
Mine did not use the correct torque and has led to in excess of $3,000 of added repair costs due to 2 x harmonic balancer / crank shaft key-ways being chewed out.
Dan
FollowupID:
390476