High camper trailer ball weight

Submitted: Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 18:56
ThreadID: 27681 Views:6399 Replies:14 FollowUps:14
This Thread has been Archived
Hi guys,

I recently purchased a camper trailer which has a 155kg ball weight. Even for a 4wd (Prado) this is on the high side and lowers the rear end somewhat.

The van is connected by a Trigg (not Treg) articulating connection. Therefore stabilising bars can’t be used to level the car.

As far as I can see at this early stage, I have two choices:

• Poly air bags.
• Upgraded suspension such as Old Man Emu.

Bit concerned about the poly air bags when I’m not towing the trailer. Am I right in concluding that wheel articulation will suffer even with the bags pressurised to 5 PSI?

If I opt for the latter, will the unsprung weight cause an uncomfortable ride during normal use around town? The coils are progressive rate.

Any help would be appreciated.

Regards

Kim

Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Willie , Epping .Syd. - Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 19:09

Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 19:09
Sorry Kim , but I am a mechanical clutz and can't answer you question BUT I was wondering what kind of CT has a 155 KG ball weight ? Does it have one of those huge boxes on the draw bar ?
I can lift the bar of my Trak Shak with one hand and this was pointed out to me as "good design" when they were doing their sales pitch .
When you were sold the CT , were you aware of this problem ?
I use Polyairs on my rear and used them on an eight week trip through the Pilbarra with the CT . They worked really well as I was carrying a huge fuel , water and food load becuase were off the beaten track for 3 weeks at a time .
Cheers ,
Willie .
AnswerID: 137047

Reply By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 19:20

Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 19:20
Kim,

Was the wtaer tank full? If it sits behind the trailers axle, it may make a bit of a difference.

Polyairs are a good option. Articulation won't be significantly affected - I had them on my old Prado and they were OK. I personally would do both - stronger springs and polyairs, and retain the factory shocks. The polyairs will give you some adjustability.

Cheers
Phil
AnswerID: 137049

Reply By: kimprado - Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 19:27

Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 19:27
Hi Willie,

No I wasm't aware of the ball weight. My fault.

The compiance plate states a dry ball mass of 155 kg. This is for a Jayco Offroad van wieghing slightly over a tonne.

The van will never be used for 4wding because they are not made for that.

However, I need to get off into reasonably formed dirt tracks from time to time.

Regards

Kim
AnswerID: 137052

Follow Up By: Member - Phil [Sunshine Coast] - Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 20:52

Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 20:52
HI kim, is the ball weight ACTUALY 155kg? or is that the max.u are allowed? The ''rule'' is 10% of the totalgross weight on the ball. 1 tonne seems heavy for an empty camper, my 2c worth.. Phil
0
FollowupID: 390779

Reply By: MartyB - Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 19:28

Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 19:28
Kim,
First question is why is it so heavy on the ball?
How many things are mounted forward of the wheels. Water tank, spare tyre etc.
Can you move anything to the rear to balance it better.
Be better to fix the problem than try & hide it modifing the suspension.

from Marty.
AnswerID: 137053

Follow Up By: kimprado - Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 19:36

Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 19:36
Hi,

No, it's a nancy pretend Offroad van. Only has a 9kg gas bottle and rack for a 20l water container which will never be used.

Regards

Kim
0
FollowupID: 390769

Reply By: MartyB - Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 19:53

Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 19:53
Kim,
Can you mount a water tank under the back?
The bigger the better, definately handy when camping & would help balance the camper when full.
If you don't want a water tank, what other options would you like? Mount them on the rear.
Always good to have an excuse to buy more options.

from Marty.
AnswerID: 137057

Reply By: Mike-TS - Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 20:17

Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 20:17
Hi Kim,

The two options you note are equally good.

The polybags allow you to retain your original springs and shouldn't make much difference around town. The bigger springs will be noticable at all times.

I'd fit polybags and ensure the trailer has as much weight as possible at the rear. The polybags give you the most flexibility.

We hired a solid floor trailer on our landcruiser at the beginning of the year and went bush up through WA. The massive weight on the rear of the Landcruiser caused all sorts of rear tyre problems with blow out after blow out - simply caused by the additional weight. After that experience I vowed a) Never hire a trailer again that put so much weight on the towball and b) ensure I had the best tyres fitted (not I have Cooper ATRs).

I once had a Defender with 8 or 9 ply skinnies and I must admit I never ever had a problem with tyres then!!

Hope this helps.

Mike
AnswerID: 137060

Reply By: Member - Captain (WA) - Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 20:40

Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 20:40
Hi Kim,

The ball weight of 155kg is not overly high for the offroad Jayco (~1200kg empty). Ball weight should be around 10%, no greater than 15%, so yours in within that range.

I have air bags in my GU Patrol for towing my Windsor Rapid and reckon they are the best thing since sliced bread. It allows you to adjust the height depending on the load. On my old 80 series, I put in heavy duty 300lb Kings springs (originals=150lbs, also tried OME 250 lbs but were too soft when loaded). While the HD springs in the 80 series were great when travelling loaded, day to day they were far too hard. So I opted for airbags in the GU and haven't looked back, would definetely recommend them over HD springs for my circumstances.

Cheers

Captain
AnswerID: 137071

Follow Up By: kimprado - Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 21:15

Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 21:15
Captain,

Now we’re getting some where. I’ve yet to be convinced that expensive suspension upgrades are the way to go. The difference being (fitted) $370 air bags, $1400 suspension.

You’ve pretty much won me over on the air bags. However, this still leaves the articulation question when the van is not connected.

Regards

Kim
0
FollowupID: 390780

Follow Up By: Member - Captain (WA) - Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 22:08

Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 22:08
Hi Kim,

I don't think I have lost any articulation with the airbags when they are at 5psi. My rear tyres still just kiss the inner guards before and after I fitted airbags (have increased my tyre size from 265/70 (31") to 285/75 (33"). Once, I had my rear stabiliser bar lose a bolt (effectively disconnected) and I had an increase in rear tyre rubbing in the guard. Just proves that the stabilser bar has a noticable impact on wheel travel while the airbags had none in my experience.

Now for the comments regarding Weight Distribution Hitches (WDH's). For my setup, I do not believe they are warranted and you may be in the same boat! My reasoning for this is that as I run standard springs I theoreticaly need to balance the ~155kgs of ball weight over the vehicle. Now as I have a steel roo bar, winch and dual batteries, I have already added something like 100kgs to the front end while in the rear i have removed the 3rd row seats, but replaced them with cargo drawers, water tank and barrier (roughly no change - those seats were heavy!).

When "no van", I have added more weight on the front end and by the time I had the van to the back I have say 155 rear/100 front distribution which I feel is very optimal. And the proof is in the pudding, my van setup is very balanced and the rig very stable even when travelling at well above speed limits (only for overtaking, on cruise control at limit all other times).

Cheers

Captain
0
FollowupID: 390785

Reply By: Member - Banjo The First (SA) - Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 21:24

Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 21:24
I have been through a similar exercise with my Campomatic camper, behind the Jackaroo - we bought the Campo because of the modest ball load (80kg). A Kimberley Kamper being heavier on the nose would have meant getting into load levelling hitches etc which as you say is a snag - and we have a ball limit of 120kg anyway - I installed polyairs myself to assist the whole show - the rear water tank is not a good answer in my view - what if you use all the water ? We have such a tank but the bags can compensate for that if needed. 150kg on the ball is within specs for many vans far as I know - some have horrendous weights on the nose - seeing you are staying on road, the bags might be the go - no harm done in that exercise - IF you need more, I'm sure an expert would go the load levelling hitch route (with hardware to suit). Anyway...... weight is the problem... whatever we do in these exercises, keeping the load down in the first place is the best strategy.
All my fiddling with the hardware is designed to avoid a "practical exercise" on the consequences of poor setup !

AnswerID: 137079

Reply By: Gerhardp1 - Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 21:32

Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 21:32
My question here is why you have a Trigg hitch when you are not going off road. As you say, you can't fit stabilisers. If you change to a standard connector with stabiliser bars you may be better off all round.

With stabilisers 50kg of luggage in the rear of the Van you will have a stabilised 100kg on your bar, and no need for polyairs or heavier springs. You may have to put a little more stuff in the back to reduce the drawbar weight depending on the distances to the axle.
AnswerID: 137081

Follow Up By: kimprado - Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 18:36

Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 18:36
Hi,

As I said in my original post, there will be times when the van is used on formed dirt tracks or exiting a road to find a bush camp. In some instances, it is necessary to cross wash aways that couldn't be crossed using a normal coupling. Been there, done that.

Regards

Kim
0
FollowupID: 390902

Reply By: atoyot - Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 21:38

Sunday, Oct 30, 2005 at 21:38
When you hook up, does the front of the Prado lift up much? You mentioned the backend dropping, which is an issue, but loss of steering control is just as, if not more important. Poly Airs (I have the Firestone airbags) might lift the back of the Prado back up, but they'll do nothing for putting some of that extra weight back over the front axle. If the steering is light when hitched up, then I suspect that the only 2 options are to change the coupling or re-distribute some of the weight to lighten the towball. As already mentioned, 10 -15% of the laden weight of the trailer is optimal. If the back is dropping independant of the front lifting, then Polyairs may help.

You mentioned that you won't be doing too much off-roading, so if articulation is not really at issue, then it might be worthwhile at least considering another option. Hyland hitches are very good, and I believe that they can be used with load levelling hitches.

I hope this helps and doesn't cloud the issue,

regards

Andrew
AnswerID: 137082

Reply By: Gerry - Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:46

Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:46
Hi,

There is no problem in using a weight distribution hitch with your coupling. I have it on mine and so have several people in our 4WD club.

Gerry
AnswerID: 137127

Follow Up By: kimprado - Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 18:28

Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 18:28
Hi Gerry,

That's interesting. I was told a weight distribution system can't be used with the Trigg coupling.

Where did you get yours?

Regards Kim.
0
FollowupID: 390901

Reply By: Sky Pilot - Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 11:33

Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 11:33
I have a Hayman Reece towbar on my Prado 90 series and am looking at either a KK or Odyssey CT for it. With all the gear on board, both CTs are going to exceed the towbar ball rating of 120kg. I would have thought that a Hayman Reece could cope with more than this. Is there a heavier duty towbar? I would prefer not to get into weight distribution hitches if at all possible.
AnswerID: 137135

Follow Up By: flappa - Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 11:49

Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 11:49
It should have no trouble doing it.

My HR hitch is rated to 2500kg with towball weight of 250kg.

The limiting factor in MOST cases is the ball weight from the manufacturer.

The only other thing I can think of is one of those smaller Box Hitches being fitted (about an Inch and a half by an Inch and a half) instead of the bigger 50mm by 50mm ones.
0
FollowupID: 390839

Follow Up By: Member - Norm C (QLD) - Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 12:14

Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 12:14
Sky Pilot, ball weight can be an issue on both the KK and Odyssey, depending on set up. I have a heap of stuff on my drawer bar (spare wheel, 2 AGMs, storage box, 4 gerries, 2 gas bottles, generator). Also have a second water tank slung under the CT forward of the axle, which carries 60 lt. The main (standard) tank is mostly rear of the axle and carries 140 lt. This is not the standard set up, but my modification.

When fully loaded (all tanks, gerries etc full), my ball weight is around 235KG, just above the rated max for my vehicle (225KG). I've only ever fully loaded the drawer bar for a short test drive and it still towed very well. Rear of vehicle dropped 35mm and front lifted 20mm. If I do a trip with this load, I would progressively empty gerries to get the weight down as I go.

I have upgraded springs (OME) and plan to install air bags.

The Odyssey can have the spare wheel slung on the back. The 'top of line' Export model has this standard as it also has the fridge on the front. This would make a big difference, probably reducing the ball weight by 40 KG or so.

You say your ball rating is 120KG. What is the rating for the vehicle? I'd have thought at least 200KG. If so, you might be better to get a new tow bar which matches with your vehicle capacity. Given that al the wireing is in place, you should be able to fit a Hayman Reese style bar for under $400.
0
FollowupID: 390842

Follow Up By: Member - Norm C (QLD) - Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 12:24

Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 12:24
My small amount of 'research' says the Prado can tow 2500KG with a ball weight max of 250KG. There are two ranges of tow packs. One has a ball weight of 120KG, the other 250KG.

Sky Pilot, if I have it right, it looks like you are up for a new tow bar, but will have no problems once you have it.
0
FollowupID: 390846

Follow Up By: Sky Pilot - Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 13:29

Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 13:29
The export is at the top of my preference list right now, with the extra 60L tank and some larger capacity AGM batteries, so it will be a fair bit heavier than the standard one. According to Rhonda, with both tanks full, there is an extra 25kg on the towball from the extra tank and water. This takes into account the rear mounted swingaway spare which is standard on the export.
I just went out and checked the car - 1998 Prado 3.4L petrol. There are no towball weight figures in the handbook - just says check with your dealer. I do have a genuine HR towbar with a 50mm square hitch. There is a Hayman Reece sticker inside the drivers door that says 2500kg, 120kg down weight on tow ball. I obviously was not sold their top of the line model. It was back in 1998 and I didn't intend towing anything much heavier than a box trailer, so maybe I made a choice on it then. Bugger alsheimers.
0
FollowupID: 390859

Follow Up By: flappa - Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 13:45

Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 13:45
Maybe before outlaying money , it might pay to visit your local friendly HR agent to check WHY , you did what you did. As you say , its their sticker. They can obviously then tell you whats different between the 2
0
FollowupID: 390863

Follow Up By: Member - Norm C (QLD) - Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 15:12

Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 15:12
SkyPilot, this is a post by Graeme666 on 25th Oct 2004:

I have been reading some past posts about towball weights and the confusion that the compliance plates on pre-1998 towbars causes. When I bought my Prado in 1998 I had a Hayman-Reese towbar fitted. After buying my camper-trailer early this year I noticed that the compliance plate on the towbar showed a maximum of 120kg towball weight, with a sticker advising that this could be increased to the manufacturers recommendation with the correct weight-distribution hitch. The vehicle is rated at 2500kg towing and 250kg towball weight. As the camper towball weight is considerably more than 120kg, I got in touch with Hayman-Reese. It seems that the towbar was made before the new national towing regulations came into effect and HR confirmed that the bar is rated to take up to 250kg. Through Lloyds Caravans in Canberra, I was able to have a new compliance plate fitted, showing a maximum ball weight of 250kg. Lloyds checked the towbar and ordered a new compliance plate from HR. HR also provided a letter, which is now with the vehicle owner's manual confirming the maximum tow and ball weights. I suggest that anyone else who has the lower limitation stamped on towbars made before '98 or '99 get in touch with Hayman Reese. I did so by e-mail and got a very quick and comprehensive response.

Might be worth checking out. Perhaps your bar is up to the task and just needs a new compliance plate.

Also, '10 Para' who posts on this site has a Odyssey Export. In fact, I think he has the first one built; which was made largely to his requested spec and was then added to the product range. He has covered most of Australia and NZ with it, so if you can find him it might be worth the effort.
0
FollowupID: 390879

Follow Up By: Member - Beatit (QLD) - Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 15:44

Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 15:44
Might already be on his way to NZ. I have his email address and will email him to look at this post.

Kind regards
0
FollowupID: 390885

Follow Up By: Member - Norm C (QLD) - Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 15:52

Monday, Oct 31, 2005 at 15:52
Still in Oz for at least 3 weeks. I saw him this morning.
0
FollowupID: 390886

Reply By: Gerry - Wednesday, Nov 02, 2005 at 10:15

Wednesday, Nov 02, 2005 at 10:15
Hi Kim
Sorry mate, only just checked my emails and found your question.
I purchased my Hayman Reese weight distribution bars through Southern Towbars here in Adelaide - actually down south in Lonsdale. I have had this on 2 vehicles now with no problems whatsoever, as have have several of our club members. If the going gets really tough, such as acute creek crossings, then simply take them off beforehand as they will limit articulation.
Cheers
Gerry
AnswerID: 137398

Reply By: kimprado - Wednesday, Nov 02, 2005 at 18:55

Wednesday, Nov 02, 2005 at 18:55
Thanks Gerry,

I'll try this. Have to get a longer bolt to fit the female Trigg section and the wieght distributing " thingo".

Like you, I'lll disconect it when going bush.

Once again Many thanks for your help.

Regards

Kim
AnswerID: 137474

Sponsored Links