HIGH LIFT JACKS ARE NOT ADR APPROVED!
Submitted: Saturday, Feb 04, 2006 at 22:07
ThreadID:
30427
Views:
3430
Replies:
9
FollowUps:
1
This Thread has been Archived
Member - laura B (NSW)
i rang autopro the other day and asked whether they had any high lift jacks available seeing that our local 4wd is the opposite to supercheap! and they said that they are not Australian Design Regulation (is that what it stands for??) quality and therefore do not stock them anymore....
has anyone else heard of this and why? i was looking into buying one but maybe one of those exhaust lifts are better?!
Laura B
HAPPY INSIDE WHEN IM OUTSIDE
Reply By: Member - Jack - Saturday, Feb 04, 2006 at 22:40
Saturday, Feb 04, 2006 at 22:40
I have a 5' high lift jack, and while it may not meet ADR standards, it has gotten me out of two spots, and we even used it as a winch for a mate of
mine on a trip where "nothing can go wrong" ....
So ... if it works, does it matter?
They are most unstable, which would account for them having problems with ADR standards, but that instability can be a plus ... just lift it up and then push it over and you are away. Under no circumstances would you find me (or anyone else I would hope) underneath a vehicle that is supported by a high lift.
The exhaust jacks are quite good as
well. Just remember to carry a bag or something similar to cover them to reduce the risk of
puncture under the car.
I understand the need for design regulations, but sometimes wonder what criteria they may use to evaluate some things.
Jack.
PS: Exhaust jacks are easier : )
AnswerID:
153027
Reply By: Peter 2 - Sunday, Feb 05, 2006 at 07:44
Sunday, Feb 05, 2006 at 07:44
The genuine Hi Lift is ok, here have been several recalls of cheaper copies, the most recent only last week.
The copies seem to have problems with the pins shearing when subject to high loads.
Saw one a bloke was using while away recently and it was a direct copy of a Hilift except for a few obvious bits. Even had sticker on it like the Hilift with a brand name Rilift which from distance looked like the genuine article.
AnswerID:
153058