Thursday, Feb 23, 2006 at 13:53
I guess this all depends on the detail. There have been a number of reports in the media with different info. So the facts remain a bit vague.
The following was copied from the National Nine News Website. If this is what is going to happen, I have no great problem. Although I think signs highlighting high accident areas (like in Northern NSW now) may be more effective than fixed cameras; but signs cost without generating income.
'Under the changes, people repeatedly caught driving drunk, unlicensed, disqualified or unregistered cars, will have their vehicles confiscated.
The alcohol breath testing units attached to the ignition, known as alcohol interlocks, will be fitted to cars for those caught twice with alcohol blood levels above 0.15 per cent.
And drivers caught speeding 20kph above the limit twice in one year would be slapped with double demerit points - meaning they could lose their licence.
Fixed speed cameras would also be introduced at accident hot spots on the Bruce Highway and the M1 between
Brisbane and the
Gold Coast.
An extra 1,000km of audible line markings will be fast-tracked, while a crackdown on drug driving will be introduced through
roadside testing following the completion of a 12-month trial already underway.'
FollowupID:
410745