follow your tracks

Tried WW but it has less resolution than google earth. Am I possibly doing something wrong.

Thats weired because the main reason I like WW better is because of the better resolution and the overlays so you can easily see the streets. Either I have not got google working properly or you have not got WW working properly. Actually it just stuck me what you may have forgotten. WW has around 10 overlays which go over the basic large map. the large map is very low quality but the overlays highlight an area of interest such as labeled geocover, land sat pseudo colour, topo maps, boundires, urban area ortho, astrobiology, etc... You choose what you want to see, and click on an overlay and it shapens up the image way better than google with the info you want. I find community landsat 7 Pseudo colour the best for roads as the real coloured version all looks brown. As mentioned, WW also has real time GPS which you need to pay for in google.

I suppose you could say google represents chanel 7,9,10 and sucks bad cause it's all gloss and not as much substance while WW is more like ABC and SBS, no crap.

keep your eye on the 'Streaming.................' read-out at the bottom of the screen. It should go to '100%' when it is fully focussed. Some areas are defintiely better zoomed than others - go to Tumby Bay in SA Eyre Peninsular and it's not very close in - go to Adelaide city and you can read the pedestrian's baseball cap logos! (well - almost).

Make sure you're firewall/anti-virus s/w is not blocking the download too

not everything on google has been 'perfected' for use of the word to see it clearly.
I can't think of the word I am looking for. It is an American program, so they have basically made a clear visual of pretty much America first and then from there working on everything else.

or you can pay for the super duper resolution. $400 if memory serves. (and if your pockets go deep enough;)