Tuesday, May 09, 2006 at 05:21
If you don't like your local club you can join the association as a member directly. Given they are one of the few groups lobbying government on our behalf it can't hurt to support them. Their magazine isn't bad and you then get info about the sort of stuff above and training courses etc.
What I find hilarious about the threads on this site & others bagging DSE is that most if not all baggers get their information from media, and polititicians via media.
Some but not all baggers have never been to the
places in question or went there once or twice and thought it was nice.
If you look at the issues they are bagged for
weather is a huge factor in what they are often criticised for.
With fuel reduction burning the fires that get away usually do so from a hot spot many days if not weeks after the original burn when conditions become perfect for a fire. Fuel reduction burning is a conundrum. You can't burn when it's wet, you can't burn when it's too dry, or when it's windy. You can't burn when it looks like it'll be dry or windy in the future but you really only accurately know the future
weather to 3-4 days in advance.
If you burn you get criticised, if you don't burn you get criticised. If you burn and it gets away a week and a half later you get caned on the internet, radio, tv & papers. If you don't burn and you get huge fires in summer you get criticised for not burning.
The thing that annoys me most is that the people doing the bulk of the criticising are journalists (who wind up the public to sell their media or get their channel watched - facts ?? who cares??) and politicians who want their locals to think they care and get re-elected. Sophie Panopolous is a good example.
Most of the knockers know very little about the science of what they are criticising or the complexity of the operation.
I'm not suggesting that the organisation is perfect, nor do I hold that belief. Most organisations and individuals have imperfections of varying degrees.
I think it's an unfortunate trait of human nature that we don't say thanks or commend them for the good work they do (can anyone remember
camping in
places like the Wonnangatta after it got popular and before the loos were built? or what some of the valleys out of Mt Beauty looked like before they started blackberry control?) bu they just love to get stuck in on the forums like this one and slander away safely behind an internet moniker and the anonymity it grants.
I wonder how many of the critics would be prepared to say the same at the various public enquiries that have been held, or put the same view in a public
forum where they are clearly identified and the body in question has a right of reply.
Internet forums are a great source of information, but the level of negative carping about DSE & the like on this one is beyond belief at times. I wonder if I start a positive post on them how far it would get.
Dave
FollowupID:
427082