Reversing Camera - Wireless or Hard Wired
Submitted: Tuesday, Jul 11, 2006 at 18:09
ThreadID:
35738
Views:
16419
Replies:
6
FollowUps:
5
This Thread has been Archived
Turist
I have just completed a 2000k trip with a Challenger and 18ft. crusader van and became convinced of the need for a reversing camers. I am unsure how
well a wireless solution would work.
Can anyone with practical experience share their experiences.
Reply By: revhead307 - Tuesday, Jul 11, 2006 at 18:19
Tuesday, Jul 11, 2006 at 18:19
Hi Turist,
Are you thinking of mounting it on the back of your vehicle or van?
If vehicle, then hardwired is simple, as run RCA cables (albeit 3 or 4m) straight to your screen.
If you go wireless, then u need to mount a separate wireless AV receiver, then run RCA's from that to your screen. (only the added pain of mounting another peice of electronics)
If mounting on the Van, wireless is the only way to go, and given the short distance should have no problems with reception.
I have seen simple wireless cameras bought off ebay used as effective backyard surveillance, so similar distance with van.
Regards
Rev
AnswerID:
182977
Reply By: Member - JohnR (Vic)&Moses - Tuesday, Jul 11, 2006 at 18:55
Tuesday, Jul 11, 2006 at 18:55
A certain member from Western Australia was here with her hubby a few months bact to find the wireless did not transmit to the vehicle through the caravan body and car body. Remember it does need line of sight. Perhaps the wireless transmitter inside the van and 'visible' to the receiver unit near the back window, also being 'visible'. I guess the back window demister wires could interfere to some extent too.
We use three wireless bridges here with high gain antennas - two houses and the dairy. It is amazing the drop off of efficiency to total loss with a branch or two getting into the fresnel zone.
AnswerID:
182987
Follow Up By: Motherhen - Tuesday, Jul 11, 2006 at 22:40
Tuesday, Jul 11, 2006 at 22:40
Hi John -
Yes - we had to hard wire ours. Someone with a Jayco had good picture transmission from the identical set up, but ours couldn't get through the metal layers of the Bushtracker - poor and very spasmodic signal. Depends on what you've got Turist. It should transmit 50 - 100 uninterrupted metres, but not too many metal obstructions. Ours worked inside the back of the caravan, but that last layer to the outside was a bit too much. It was probably worth a try for us, the cameras weren't much difference in price, and came with wires for hardwiring.
FollowupID:
439552
Follow Up By: Member - JohnR (Vic)&Moses - Wednesday, Jul 12, 2006 at 11:14
Wednesday, Jul 12, 2006 at 11:14
Something we have changed here Mutha, but all sorts of revisions take place, and will in the future too, including towables. I wonder if the wireless would be better at the front of the van and into the car?
No connecting wires then between, but the systems need to be good to continually connect Regards to Jim please
FollowupID:
439644
Reply By: Derek from Affordable Batteries & Radiators - Tuesday, Jul 11, 2006 at 19:34
Tuesday, Jul 11, 2006 at 19:34
Hi Turist
We are testing a wireless twin camera system at the moment that we are importing.
The camera has its own built in 2.4g transmitter and has a range of 100m. The monitor has a built in 2.4g receiver so there is no wiring except for a 12v supply.
So far the tests are good.
I will post the final results soon.
Regards Derek.
AnswerID:
182992
Follow Up By: Cammo - Thursday, Jul 13, 2006 at 08:37
Thursday, Jul 13, 2006 at 08:37
I look forward to seeing the results.
FollowupID:
439797
Reply By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Tuesday, Jul 11, 2006 at 23:07
Tuesday, Jul 11, 2006 at 23:07
I'm using the Poron hardwired unit. It is very good. I have the 2nd camera on the back of the Ultimate. The cable between the truck and trailer is a solid coily cord with a plug on both vehciles, so it can be totally removed. The screen has various buttons on it, one of which switches between the 2 cameras.
I can't comment on the wireless set-up, but with the amount of electrical stuff I've fitted to my rig (like most people I guess) I would not want to rely on the radio wave type myself.
Cheers
Roachie
AnswerID:
183064
Follow Up By: Peter - Wednesday, Jul 12, 2006 at 10:25
Wednesday, Jul 12, 2006 at 10:25
Agree. I also have the Poron hard wired system. I camera on the back of the Patrol for reversing and the second camera on the back of the van (23'). Have the monitor mounted on the sun visor so it tucks up out of the way when not in use. Came with a remote control so that I can switch between cameras. Vision from both cameras is excellent. Only the camera on the van is infra red.
Have heard of a number of complaints about wireless with aluminium clad vans
Peter
FollowupID:
439631
Reply By: Mr Fawlty - Wednesday, Jul 12, 2006 at 16:52
Wednesday, Jul 12, 2006 at 16:52
The wireless systems still require power to the camera so you may as
well run the RCA lead for the video....
AnswerID:
183177
Follow Up By: Motherhen - Thursday, Jul 13, 2006 at 00:19
Thursday, Jul 13, 2006 at 00:19
We have the
camera powered from the caravan batteries near the rear of the van so that wasn't an issue for us - just it wouldn't transmit reliably. The guy with the Jayco got a perfect picture.
FollowupID:
439779
Reply By: Member - Vincent A M (NSW) - Wednesday, Jul 12, 2006 at 18:35
Wednesday, Jul 12, 2006 at 18:35
i tried wireless always had problems (now in the bin), Now have a polaris hard wire 2 station great, best money spent. but spend a little extra & get the H/duty fully
water proof 130degree
camera The dust &
water can get in the cheaper ones I've found the
camera's the main thing the screen does not mater much as long as its the type that can be left on.
AnswerID:
183204