Sunday, Mar 09, 2003 at 13:44
Scott,
Not much to dispute there given the operation that you run and there is no doubt that gas has its advantages.
I usually
cook for 4 and for dinner this boils down to pasta and a`sauce (not always preprepared). I
cook the sauce first on the primary then transfer to the secondary to simmer and boil a large pot of water for the pasta.
For a quick brew I have a compact Butane/Propane cooker.
In 5 years I have not run out of fuel mid cooking as I fill the tank prior to cooking (or at least
check). You cannot fill the tank during cooking as the design prevents this and even so the tank does not get hot. As for priming and starting: this becomes second nature.The most annoying part is filling the tank because no matter how careful you are you are bound to get a little petrol on your hands. However having said that I think that the concerns over the risks of using fuel are greatly exaggerated, but care is always required, I would't smoke while filling my car either.
As an infrequent user I don't have to worry about how much gas is in the bottle whereas I can easily tell how much ULP I have.
I have not had to replace the jet on the stove yet but have had to do so on the Lantern. This cost $9.00 after 5 years. I could have cleaned the jet in the generator in turps to remove the gumming up associated with petrol.
I also use a fluoro when I can park the truck close enough to the work area.
As for fuel consumption 5 Litres would last me up to 10 days for both Lantern and Stove.
Would I change to gas? For me on balance, no. The ultimate
test is that no one has complained about the taste or temperature of the food or the time it takes to
cook.
Mahn
FollowupID:
8904