Speed cameras - should we dob...?

Submitted: Wednesday, Sep 27, 2006 at 18:44
ThreadID: 38101 Views:2404 Replies:4 FollowUps:7
This Thread has been Archived
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/5383726.stm
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Duncs - Wednesday, Sep 27, 2006 at 18:57

Wednesday, Sep 27, 2006 at 18:57
Watch this space eh!

It raises some interesting arguments on both sides doesn't it.

If you are not breaking the law you have nothing to worry about. If you are constantly watching the speedo are you paying sufficient attention to the road?

What I do know is that fuel costs are keeping my speed down.

Going away for a week including the long weekend. Bet I don't see a speed camera where I am going. Probably won't see a Cop either

Duncs
AnswerID: 196826

Follow Up By: Road Runner - Wednesday, Sep 27, 2006 at 21:33

Wednesday, Sep 27, 2006 at 21:33
Hi Duncs,

Doubt if the UK precedent will have any affect in Australia as there seem to be two different methods of dealing with the legislation.

Going by the report UK law differs to Australian Law. In the UK the driver (I assume registered owner) either admits to driving or refuses to provide information on the driver. I guess failure to disclose information of the driver would lead to some other offence either under the traffic code or perhaps more serious offence of a criminal nature. Hence the forceful approach to disclose.

In Australia it seems more simplified. The registered owner is guilty unless he/she provides the identity of the person behind the wheel. I understand companies (no specific person as an owner) are penalized to a higher degree, ie the fine is four or five times higher if the identity of the driver is not disclosed. This would circumvent any civil rights issues as the choice rests with the owner as to payment of the fine or passing on the guilt. There is probably some other snippet of legislation placing the onus and the points on the owner if he/she fails to disclose. In other words there is no forced requirement to admit or disclose such as the UK approach.

Cruise control keeps me out of trouble!
0
FollowupID: 455261

Follow Up By: Scoey (QLD) - Wednesday, Sep 27, 2006 at 22:19

Wednesday, Sep 27, 2006 at 22:19
Same idea I reckon. They can't prove that the registered owner is the offender so what happened to innocent until proven guilty? Basically the owner can admit guilt to somethign the police can't prove (or pay the fine as you put it) or dob in someone else! I reckon it's got legs here too! Always thought there was something wrong with the presumtion of guilt they use - must admit though, I've always placed my faith in the makers of the laws to get it right but! haha!

Cheers
Scoey!
0
FollowupID: 455274

Follow Up By: V6 PATROL - Thursday, Sep 28, 2006 at 19:09

Thursday, Sep 28, 2006 at 19:09
they dont have to prove it is the problem . I lost my points and was not given the oportunity of the good behaviour bond of 1 point for a year due to I did not receive the letter in the mail. I enquired with transport dept they said the letters are automated upon payment of fine and thats when points are removed and then they send the option to you . When asked well how can you prove that I received it they said they dont have to,thats the end of the process. years ago it was registered mail and it had to be collected from post office. I went to court claiming I had a raw deal explained to the judge what had happened and that I worked for post for 12 years and how it was so simple for me not to receive the leter due to human fault or machine fault. He said cant change the 6 months as that is the law but took 700 hundred off the fine so had a small win. And think he new where I was coming from. I got caught driving with out license as I didnt know I had no points so it was automatic 6 months by no fault of m yown. the letter showed up 3 weeks after caught approx 6 weeksafter the actual date of offence. typical of government.
0
FollowupID: 455426

Reply By: Exploder - Wednesday, Sep 27, 2006 at 19:47

Wednesday, Sep 27, 2006 at 19:47
I don’t know, I am of the opinion stuff em, admit nothing LOL

But seriously when fines can sometimes take 2 months to come thro and if you have a car that 2,3 or even 4 people drive at different times or even on the same day how are you meant to remember who was driving the thing on X date at X time when the offence could of happened 60 day’s prior.

For me in 2 months I would have travelled between 3500-5000k's and could have been driving any one of 3 cars’ in that time.

The only way I could 100% know that it was me driving at the time, is if it was between the times I travel two and from work or if it happened on a road I regally use as I would remember.
AnswerID: 196833

Follow Up By: On Patrol - Wednesday, Sep 27, 2006 at 20:44

Wednesday, Sep 27, 2006 at 20:44
You could do what many companies do and that is log in and out of each car via a simple exercise book in each car, who was driving and when. You get into the car and log in and log out when you leave it. Very simple.

IE: Fred, 1.30pm - 2.30pm 27/9/2006. Parramatta.
Jill, 6.30am - 5.90pm 26/9/2006. Haberfield.
ETC, ETC.
0
FollowupID: 455250

Follow Up By: On Patrol - Wednesday, Sep 27, 2006 at 20:46

Wednesday, Sep 27, 2006 at 20:46
Did you spot the obvious mistake????

5.90 = 6.30
0
FollowupID: 455251

Follow Up By: Exploder - Wednesday, Sep 27, 2006 at 21:18

Wednesday, Sep 27, 2006 at 21:18
Ha ha Yes

Anyway

Not really a practical exercise for me personally to do just encase I get a Ticket come throe which I haven’t for 3 years and the only speeding fine I have almost been issued in 5 years I got out of anyway, Long story short, Thou I was technically speeding The cop’s recons he clocked me at X amount over the limit, I proved that was incorrect by at lest 20Kp/h so I was let off with a warning.

80% of the time I will be in my car but for the rest I could be driving the old man’s car, my brothers car or a relatives car for what ever reason.

I guess my point is, if they are going to put out these camera’s that “Save life’s” the infringement should show up with in a week of it occurring, not 2 months or 3 months after the date when you can hardly remember being where they say you were let alone what speed you were doing. How is that helping to save life’s.

Not to mention all the stuff up’s that you keep reading about, where cameras have been out of calibration, people being fined twice for one infringement and infringements being sent out to the wrong person and so on.
0
FollowupID: 455256

Follow Up By: Member - Jeff M (WA) - Thursday, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:31

Thursday, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:31
Hmm, I wonder what would happen if I registered the 4wd in my 2 year old daughter's name....

They send a fine. We do nothing.

What are they going to do? Canel her driver's license? Lock her up in Jail? LOL I've never thought about it before, but I reckon that would be an interesting test.
0
FollowupID: 455315

Reply By: Robin - Thursday, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:41

Thursday, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:41
This is a tricky situation.

I note various sites etc begining to show that speed camera's
could cause an increase in accidents in some circumstances
and there is some justification to say that their net saftey
effect might be negative.

I also note that blatant overuse and fine margins have caused
an increased disrespect for authority.

The bottom line is that there are more gadgets and less police
on the roads and this has encouraged the approach that traffic lights
may be regarded as "optional" for some.

Optional lights being those without camera's.

I don't think I'd dobb anyone in unless they displayed serious
and dangerous behaviour, as opposed to running a red light when
there was obviously no one around.

Leading up to an election here in victoria we were well aware of
reduced numbers of roadside camera's. Now our government has
announced a 7/8 drop off ratio offically.

Its hard not to be cynical.

Robin Miller
AnswerID: 196917

Reply By: Darren C - Thursday, Sep 28, 2006 at 14:44

Thursday, Sep 28, 2006 at 14:44
All I can say is they must have bloody good cameras

I got caught in my girlfiends car speeding and the ticket came through in her name. Due to us forgetting about it until the last minute we sent the form and the money in without confirming who the driver was.

They wrote back straight away to say that it clearly wasnt my girlfriend driving and could we please confirm the actual driver.

Was shocked it could pick up that detail!

AnswerID: 196968

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)