80/100 series

Submitted: Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 14:16
ThreadID: 42559 Views:2803 Replies:8 FollowUps:12
This Thread has been Archived
Could any body explain why the 100 series is so much heavier on the fuel than a 80 series. They roughly quote 15/17 for the 80 and 20/22 for the 100 series. I'm talking about the 4.5L Petrol motor in the 80 and early solid front end 100 series. Steve M
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Barnesy (SA) - Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 15:22

Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 15:22
Weight? If I'm correct the 100 series is a fair bit heavier.
AnswerID: 223178

Reply By: Member - Tour Boy- Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 15:45

Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 15:45
Mate who cares it's not like we but them for their fuel efficiency, merely their ability, comfoft and power. Go the LPG.
Tour Boy
Cheers,
Dave
2010 Isuzu FTS800 Expedition camper
2015 Fortuner
Had 72 cruisers in my time

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

AnswerID: 223185

Follow Up By: Member - Stephen M (NSW) - Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 17:06

Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 17:06
Hi there Tour Boy, Yes very true about not buying for fuel efficiency, but also want to be able to run the thing. Under the 20 isnt so bad but if its getting up around 23/25 when towing then not for me. Could have bought myself a 100 series like yours for 16k last year GXL with 156k on it in dark blue but missed out due to me humming and haring toooo long about fuel consumption and missed a bargain. Plenty of petrol 80/100 on the market and obviously a sh#t load cheaper then the turbo diesel in auto which are bloody hard to find. Have been waiting/looking at rodeo's which yes I know totally different to a cruiser but talking to wife last night now she's asking about getting auto which puts the rodeo/hilux (unless V6) right out of the question. So now wondering which way I am going to go. My problem is I want it as capable as the old lux off road but now looking for a few creature comforts as well like in the cruiser,roooooom. Cant have it all I guess unless you have unlimited $$$$ which unfortunately I dont have like most of us, morgage etc. Steve M
0
FollowupID: 484041

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 18:02

Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 18:02
Well bloody said mate. 100% with you on that.

Mine is a ripper. Reliable, comfortable, fast, capable off-road and cheap to run on LPG. When you can't get gas, use petrol.
0
FollowupID: 484058

Follow Up By: Member - Tour Boy- Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 19:36

Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 19:36
Sorry guys I didn't check the rushed spelling. Steve that brown one in the pic cost me 18k 7 weeks ago and has more gear than the members rig shows and most already on it. It uses around 18 - 20 on LPG down to 14 on petrol (not premium) but has about 40% more grunt than the 80 dual cab had. This one will spin all fours on bitumin. Going up the coast with the boat on tomorrow so I will let you know fuel figures after the 2nd if you like. The 80 got as low as 18 lt per 100km with the boat on going up the coast on LPG.
Don't forget heaps cheaper to service for oil and filters every 10k. Just new plugs every 20k. 6cyl Diesels average about $90 for oil and $30 for filter every 5k. Costs me $50 for oil and $5 for filter every 10k. And you usually have more power to boot and still great off road. How many hardcore trucks/ buggies are diesel nowdays? not many.
Anyhow I'm going fishin'
Tour Boy
Cheers,
Dave
2010 Isuzu FTS800 Expedition camper
2015 Fortuner
Had 72 cruisers in my time

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 484067

Follow Up By: Mayesy - Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 22:45

Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 22:45
Stephen
not sure what your budget is but this option may be worth considering. I recently picked up a 98 GXL 100 series standard diesel auto and then spent $4k on after market turbo. I could not be happier with my TD Auto. Not as powerful as factory version but the fuel consumption is pretty good. On a long run to townsville I got a return of 11l per 100k and around town just today when I checked was 12.6l per 100k. The vehicle was 1 owner in immaculate condition with 155k on the clock. These vehicles are rare but red books value them around low 20's. Also you get the live axle front end without the dramas of the IFS.
I am now trying to decide on tyres which are due soon. My previous 60 series I ran Bridgstone desert duellers 15inch and they were fantastic tyres and only $170 per tyre. I was disappointed to learn these are not available in 16inch. Any body got some suggestions on tyres?
cheers Geoff
0
FollowupID: 484314

Reply By: Member - Cruiser (NSW) - Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 16:15

Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 16:15
Has a 4.5 Litre 80 series and if you can get it to give 17/17L per 100k on highway, then your doing well.

My experience was about 19/20 per 100K and that was driving sedately and with 2 persons/no load/no towing and, wait for it...................................... a hiclone.
AnswerID: 223190

Follow Up By: Member - Stephen M (NSW) - Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 16:52

Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 16:52
Hi there cruiser, yeah I have heard mainly around the 20 mark. Went through a few different car reviews last night (getting a bit edgy waiting for a good rodeo) and most were saying as mentioned above, but went through the archives on here last night and seems to be more like the figures you have quoted. I know my mates who's is on LPG is using 22 per 100 round town. Steve M
0
FollowupID: 484035

Follow Up By: Andrew from Vivid Adventures - Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 16:52

Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 16:52
was it a head-on hiclone or tail-wind hiclone?
0
FollowupID: 484036

Follow Up By: Member - Stephen M (NSW) - Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 17:08

Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 17:08
Hi there cruiser, forgot to mention the wife is now talking auto. Which isnt such a bad thing as I can have a few ale's and she can drive, just havnt told her that yet, maybe I should then she might revert back to getting a manual. Steve M
0
FollowupID: 484042

Follow Up By: Member - Cruiser (NSW) - Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 17:52

Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 17:52
At least it wasnt a Fitch
0
FollowupID: 484053

Reply By: BenSpoon - Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 18:49

Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 18:49
I reckon toyota have been pulled up on fudging their consumption figures. 80's dont get 15/17. EVERYone I have asked with a petrol quotes around 20.
100 series are 200kg heavier from memory, but both cruisers have shocking consumption.
AnswerID: 223207

Follow Up By: Rockfish - Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 13:31

Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 13:31
Yes they do, if you know how to drive them. My 1995 4.5 80 has 130,000km on the clock and the best fuel consumption I have had is 15L per 100, mind you this was on the highway with a tail wind :-) Worst is 25L per 100 at Christmas on Fraser Island towing a camper trailer and very soft sand conditions.
I average around town 16.5 - 17.5. Best towing a camper trailer was last year from Coffs to Brisbane 17L per 100. The secret? A conservative right foot, run premium fuel and maintain the thing ie. regular fuel and air filter changes.
0
FollowupID: 484232

Reply By: JimDi - Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 19:06

Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 19:06
Stephen,
I have a manual 80 seriies 4.5. I am happy with it because I can tow 6m van in all conditions and have the aircon as well etc. About 4yrs ago whilst at a caravan park at Bowen everyone was bragging about their rigs and what consumption they were getting etc. Sooo.. next trip I checked mine and have never ever gone back to check again otherwise I would never go anywhere. From memory it was about 22plus. I doubt if I have ever done 15/17. I know this wont help but what can you do. Upgrade okay but I can buy a lot of fuel for the cost of the upgrade.
JimDi
AnswerID: 223211

Reply By: chardthechippy - Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 21:44

Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 21:44
I went thru the same thing 6 mths ago, should I get a big thirsty wagon or a small light dual cab. Diesel never came into the equation unless it was factory turboed and manual. I settled for the 100 4.5 auto and it is like driving an armchair in a very lounge room around, I just steer it where I want to go and sit back and enjoy the comfort. I am in the process of converting to injected gas and will make the money back in 40 thousand kays (2 years). I tow a tradesmans trailer every day and would hate to changing gears in peak hour traffic with a trailer on the back. If you can afford a few extra bucks a day definately get behind a 100 series, if you want space you have to add weight unfortunately!
AnswerID: 223255

Follow Up By: Go-N-Grey (WA) - Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 21:37

Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 21:37
I agree, I also agonised over fuel consumption. Just purchased a new V8 Auto LC100 ($60K on the road including WA's exorbitant 6% Stamp duty & 12 months license, with Bullbar and towbar), and now have just 1000k on the clock and following fuel consumption very closely.

Results so far, 700K, 114lites = 16.2 Km/100k, pretty well on the mark for the quoted ADR figures, 50% urban running, 40% country running at about 100Km/hr, and however this included towing a 22' 2.4 tonne full height off-road caravan for 80km on freeways around Perth at about 80km/hour. (Running in!)

Towed the van on the weekend about 80Km at 80km/hour on cruise control against a head wind, up a 1000' climb and was shocked at the rate the the fuel gauge dropped, but the speed never dropped below 78km/hr on the steepest hills where the V8 was in 3rd gear spinning at 3500rpm.

My ex Turbo Diesel Pajero (1990) struggled to maintain 80km hour unloaded on the same hill, and with 17' Jayco poptop behind is back to 60Km/hr. Fuel consumption for this rig over 28,000km was rarely better than 15ltrs/100km.

Moral of story:

Big petrol engine = big power = big fuel consumption

Drive with at light foot at speeds/acceleration achievable by a diesel on the same task, fuel consumption will only be about 15-20% more than the diesel, primarily because diesel fuel in Australia contains 15% more ENERGY that ULP.

In Perth ULP is also ofter 15% cheaper than diesel, although I accept that differential does not exist in remote places.

At $10-20k cheaper than the equivalent turbo diesel model at 7% interest only = $700 to $1400 saving p.a , it is not until you do more than 20,000 km year that the saving in fuel just pays for the interest. The capital also still has to be repaid!

Redbook figures for 2nd hand LC only show a slightly higher depreciation rate for the petrol version for the same age and mileage as a diesel (Auto TD excepted), however Toyota have recently discounted the auto petrol version by $5K plus and this is yet to flow thought to the 2nd hand market

We haven't got to servicing yet, but posts previously in this forum have indicated the Turbo diesels are not cheap in this regard!

The ride, smoothness, power, lack of vibration of the V8 has to be seen to be believed, and sitting at 80km/hr on cruise control with a 2.8 tonne van in tow in a very quiet lounge room with relaxing classical music, with commanding views of the surrounding landscape (passing slowly by) certainly gives credence to the saying "its the journey, not the destination is the enjoyable part"

I loved my 308 V8 Holden Panel Van in the 70's, a strong tough vehicle that could tow anything, forever, effortlessly, and now I've found a better one..... and the fuel consumption is even better.

PS I also love my wife's Toyota Prius Hybrid at 3.8ltr/100km. I call it green house trading :-)
0
FollowupID: 484303

Reply By: luch - Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 22:38

Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 22:38
The 100 series is 400kg heavier, 100mm wider body and 450mm longer

The manufacture Always Notes
(Note: Fuel economy varies with driving conditions/style, vehicle conditions, options and accessories.)

ADR 81/01 Test standard

I guess this is how they can make the Figures look so good

Standard form, Unloaded, no extras
AnswerID: 223270

Follow Up By: Zapper - Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:19

Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:19
A 100 series is closer to the same dimensions as an 80 than you think, actually 101mm longer and 10mm wider according to the specs but about 277kg kerb weight heavier
0
FollowupID: 484203

Follow Up By: luch - Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 18:33

Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 18:33
No its not i own both 100 and 80 series and have measured
0
FollowupID: 484270

Reply By: Black Beard - Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 22:55

Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 22:55
It's only petrol - there's plenty more where that came from!!!
AnswerID: 223276

Sponsored Links