Injured Roo - what to do?
Submitted: Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:22
ThreadID:
42929
Views:
4440
Replies:
28
FollowUps:
30
This Thread has been Archived
Robin
We are holding a 4wd practise event next weekend and so were out
clearing the proposed tracks.
Can't remember the forest ever looking so bad, and even had two
large branches come down due to heat stress whilst we were working.
Track was hard and remote, and at one point the track came close to private property and a plain wire fence.
About a dozen roo's ran across the track and into the fence.
Most got thru but one slipped and when somesaulted over the fence but with
head and leg between top two wires. This caused it to flip and half
strangle itself, and it was left alive, but couldn't escape and with a broken leg
still caught between the two wire strands.
We went up to it , probably would have just shot it if by myself but had
couple of teenagers there.
Want do you think may have been best course of action from then ?
Robin Miller
Reply By: Wayne - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:34
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:34
Suppose it would depend a bit on what size it was? If only wallaby size you could perhaps cover it's head with a jacket or blanket that might calm it down and then take it to an animal
shelter? If it was fullsize going to be a lot harder, might have to introduce the teenagers to the facts of life?
What did you do?
Cheers, Wayne
AnswerID:
225347
Follow Up By: Robin - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:34
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:34
Fortunately no Joey Wayne.
I'll post my actions later as want to give chance for
some replies.
It was quite a sensitive matter though and animal was larger than
Wallaby, but probably could have carried it.
However it was still suspended from fence with one leg obviously broken.
Being in steep terrain, maybe 15km dirt from road, taking it
to animal
shelter didn't even enter my mind - thanks for raising
that one , should be prepared for that when circumstances permit.
Robin Miller
FollowupID:
486263
Reply By: Wayne (NSW) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:43
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:43
Robin,
"We went up to it , probably would have just shot it if by myself but had
couple of teenagers there." Sounds like the teenagers shot the roo.
If that is not the case and you are worried about the teenagers, tell them to go for a walk if you don't want them to see what is happening.
Check after the deed is done to see if there is a joey. If here is remove and take it to the nearest town and hand it over to WIRES.
BTW, how many people carry a gun on a track
clearing week end or carry one on any trip. I do a lot of outback trips and never have and never will carry any form of firearm. No need.
Wayne
AnswerID:
225351
Follow Up By: Robin - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:14
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:14
Hi Wayne
Don't want to get sidetracked into firearms issue , its personnal choice , but in sort of country I was in with lots of
forrest sections bordering onto private farms there are significant feral animal issues of all kinds , and have not the best , memories of a Wombat leaping into by back wheel on a snow covered track recently whilst I was leading a trip , lot of blood on snow and it was still alive. Wasn't carrying rifle and it took several hits with an axe and was very messy to kill, espically with people around. Rifle is much better.
Robin MIller
FollowupID:
486259
Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 15:10
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 15:10
Each to his own. I consider an accurate rifle in 'broken down' form a good thing to have around on any trip.
FollowupID:
486329
Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 17:33
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 17:33
I wouldn't dream of going bush without a gun - for various reasons. Don't fall into the trap of thinking "guns are bad": they are just a tool in a similar fashion to a chainsaw.
Robin:
I would have shot it. By the time children get to their teenage years they are old enough to cope (where do they think their BBQ steaks come from?) and _should_ be introduced to the realities of "real" life in the bush. If they didn't want to see they could take a walk before I shot it. We try to sanitize death in The West and that's not a good thing.
I hate killing but I hate animals suffering even more and nature would kill that roo otherwise, slowly and painfully - she has no mercy.
Mike Harding
FollowupID:
486361
Follow Up By: fisho64 - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 23:00
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 23:00
Yeah ditto a rifle, not an essential tool by any means. But always handy to have a long. Wouldnt go bush without the trusty .22 in the back.
Agree also that teenagers are "sanitized" and have no frigging idea what goes on outside of the city limits.
Had a conversation a while back with a good mate and was stunned to hear he had not fired anything but a BB gun (43yrs old).
Roos are common as, and personally I would think that animal protectionist groups would be better off to spend there money rescuing bilbies and other rarer animals than your run-of-the-mill kangaroo?
No I dont shoot roos except in the above situation, only rabbits and foxes.
FollowupID:
486442
Reply By: Road Runner - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:06
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:06
Years ago I followed a grazier out of
Longreach on the
Jundah road at night. He was definitely a grazier as the rest of us couldn’t afford a Ford Fairlane back then! He hit a ‘roo on a
creek crossing and stopped. I stopped about fifteen yards back and got out of the car to see if everything was ok. He backed up over the roo, drove forward, backed up over it again and then finally drove forward over it and continued on his way. As a
young bloke I thought at first he was somewhat brutal but I soon came to learn that the graziers out there were very caring for all animals injured – even
pests and what he did was the most humane option. I assume he either didn’t have a firearm or wasn’t wasteful of ammunition.
If you don’t have a firearm the best course is a hard blow to the head with a solid lump of wood. Of course you would need to explain the lesson to any teenagers present. Tough, I know but better than leaving the animal to suffer a slow painful death.
AnswerID:
225355
Follow Up By: Member - Oldplodder (QLD) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 17:13
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 17:13
Have done the same, driving over a roo after it jumped in front of me.
Usually carry an axe and use that, the blunt side, the sharp side results in too much blood.
Have had the family in the car, so have driven over it at night rather than letting them see me in the car headlights hitting the roo with an axe.
It had a broken back after tumbling through under the car.
Checked for a joey first as best as I could.
FollowupID:
486356
Reply By: Member - MrBitchi (QLD) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:24
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:24
Rule 303.
It's more humane to shoot it then leaving it to suffer.
AnswerID:
225357
Reply By: Scubaroo - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:17
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:17
It would be beyond cruelty to walk away and leave an animal to suffer like that - being stuck in a fence is hardly "nature" at work. Assuming a firearm wasn't present, a bloody swift hard blow to the head is probably the quickest and least stressful way to put a roo down. Have seen it done with a tyre iron before (exactly the same circumstances - broken leg in a fence), and it unfortunately required more than one strike. A large shifting spanner would probably be more effective, as it has a lot more weight to it, and I happen to carry one of those for the towball. Many people probably also carry the handles for hilift jacks.
Two other most common implements carried by 4WDers are probably shovels and axes - not sure about an ax - while they work a treat on poultry (grew up on a
farm!), I can't picture the roo being still enough to allow for a clean stroke, and the shovel similarly probably wouldn't impart enough of a blow to be a humane method.
AnswerID:
225366
Reply By: Member - Doug T (W.A) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:19
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:19
Robin
Funny you mention a Roo getting tangled in a fence because I seen/found one about 80 m from the highway couple of weeks ago, Now I don't care who it is that thinks they are better than the next person ie do gooders If i were to find a Roo in that predicament I would put it down with what ever means I had , [trouble is though the damn Gov't has dis-Armed all honest Australian,] I took photo's of that Roo long after it was too late for it and I have posted the 2 photo's so people will see what suffering this Animal must have had before the end came and would be a good reason to put it out of it's misery, Now OK there will be some that will say take it to a Vet , that's ok if your in a Ute and the vet is with a few klm, common sense must prevail,
WARNING the photo's may cause distress to children .
Site Link
Doug
AnswerID:
225367
Reply By: Member - Davoe (Nullagine) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:28
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:28
Shoot it or if you dont have a gun get something substantial and dong it. if teenagers are present they will get a lesson on the facts of life (I remember finishing off plenty of roos as a teenager) Just be care full as they get nasty if they free themselves even with a broken leg. Plenty of roo and emu carcasses stuck in fences as proof as to their chances
AnswerID:
225370
Follow Up By: Member - Davoe (Nullagine) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:32
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:32
oh
yea if it has a pinky joey dong that too, If they have hair you have some chance of raising it otherwise send it the same way as its mother. ones at foot can sometimes be caught as they take
shelter
FollowupID:
486275
Follow Up By: Member - bushfix - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:59
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:59
agreed. hit a roo near Mt Augustus and was very sad to see its pouch moving. get it over with quickly. also, dpending on the circumstances, a sharp knife to the throat (of the roo) is an option depending on how toey it is. it's never going to be fun.
FollowupID:
486288
Follow Up By: Hairy - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 13:33
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 13:33
Yep!
FollowupID:
486305
Reply By: Member - Doug T (W.A) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:31
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:31
Re Teenagers
What's all the fuss about Teenagers in these posts, they are
young adults , I was always amid the action of trapping and gutting rabbits long before I was a teenager , My 2 kids seen plenty of slaughter on the roads when they came with me in the truck at various times of their lives and They have now grown up OK , Modern society tends to try and hide the inevitable ,Think of what the poor little kids would been exposed to in the wars.
AnswerID:
225371
Follow Up By: F4Phantom - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 15:40
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 15:40
Hey on that same line, I agree, kids are wrapped up in bandages these days. Some kids grow up watching up thousands of TV murders but are not aloud to get dirty!
FollowupID:
486338
Follow Up By: Member - Tim - Stratford (VIC) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 17:07
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 17:07
Doug & Phantom,
Yep, no argument here - the kids helped feed the piglets at a mate's place, along with the lamb - Kids sure appreciated the hand fed 'meat', not too tough for little teeth!!!
Bottom line for the kids - piglets and lamb are great to look at and play with - but better in a
camp oven!!!
FollowupID:
486354
Reply By: DIO - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:00
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:00
At the risk of criticism by the cowboys and red-necks known to sometimes frequent this
forum, I'll jump in with a few 'thoughts':
You may have contributed to the demise of the roos by your presence - vehicle spooked it/them.
If the track came close to private property, then you were probably in a designated forest or national park. IF you were in possession of a firearm, you are probably breaking the rules (law).
If you did destroy the injured animal - by other means - you may still be liable for prosecution by RSPCA even though YOU thought that the animal should be killed.
If (IF) you were in possession of a firearm whilst you were out
clearing tracks for a 4wd event, then the law is likely to consider such possession as inappropriate (I certainly do and probably many others would agree). Many 4wd users certainly wouldn't consider such possession as justifiable and permissible on such an outing. I do not like the idea of someone in possession of a firearm, in the bush, without any justifiable reason. Simply to take it with you, as you might a chain saw, or recovery equipment is a poor choice. No wonder there has been radical changes to firearms ownership laws of late. YES, I am a firearms owner, consider myself to be responsible and despise anyone whose actions might contribute to my right to legally own firearms - without UNDUE restrictions. Gee I'm a bit off track now, beating my drum regards (restrictive) firearm laws. Still it only takes the actions of a few idiots that ruin it for the majority. Bit like people (idiots) abusing access to tracks etc then having them closed off permanently for all.
Everday wildlife somewhere suffers injury, is left to suffer - fend for itself most times without intervention from some
well meaning passerby. That's life.
As for the teenagers (requiring protection from the sight of death/suffering), many people might agree that it's often the adults/parents that need protection from uncontrolled, feral teenagers running amok within the community.
AnswerID:
225375
Follow Up By: Wayne (NSW) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:12
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:12
Well said
Wayne
FollowupID:
486278
Follow Up By: blown4by - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 13:11
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 13:11
So what DIO do you suggest would have been his correct and most humane course of action. Leave it there to die hanging in the fence as you often see or perhaps not go out in the bush in the first place? I agree with the theme of most of the other posts. Put it out of it's misery and if there are teenagers there
well they have got to learn sooner or later the responsible thing to do in these situations. If they are too
young or you don't want to expose them to it, which is every parents personal choice, send them for a walk as was suggested. Regarding your suggestion "If (IF) you were in possession of a firearm whilst you were out
clearing tracks for a 4wd event, then the law is likely to consider such possession as inappropriate (I certainly do and probably many others would agree)". I also am a responsible licensed firearms owner and no, I don't cary them with me everywhere I go, but I don't agree with you in the respect of your comment about what the law considers appropriate. Unless you are in a firearms prohibited area e.g. National Park it is the licence holders decision alone and I don't see that it is anybody elses business where you carry a firearm and you are allowed to do that subject to the licence conditions being met such as it being kept secure, out of sight, etc. All the station owners and farmers with large land holdings that I know would never go out on their properties with a rifle (kept out of sight) and a sharp knife. It is standard kit in the vehicle should they have to destroy any sick or injured stock or come across any vermin while on the property. It is also a good back up to radio and mobile phone communications (if available) to attract attention in the case of an accident or injury sustained while alone. To them it is just an everyday tool that they carry without a second thought such as a city dweller carries a laptop or mobile. Regards the RSPCA, I would be very happy to go to court charged on the grounds of destroying humanely an injured animal which otherwise would have no hope of recovery and if left to nature would die a cruel and miserable death of
FollowupID:
486297
Follow Up By: Gerhardp1 - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 17:01
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 17:01
Problem with some people, is they have a supercilious attitude.
eg "I do not like the idea of someone in possession of a firearm, in the bush, without any justifiable reason." Then this "YES, I am a firearms owner, consider myself to be responsible and despise anyone whose actions might contribute to my right to legally own firearms"
So it's OK for you to tell someone else what to do, but you despise the reverse.
If the 'roo is suffering, it should be put to death as fast as possible using the best available tool/object.
If you have a gun, shoot it, if not, a suitable lump of wood used as a club will do.
If there are teenagers present, ask them first how they will save it, and when they can't come up with a (non-existent) solution within 30 seconds, take the above action.
But make sure there are no supercilious hypocrites around, for they will surely dob you in for being humane.
FollowupID:
486352
Follow Up By: Member - Tim - Stratford (VIC) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 17:15
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 17:15
Blown4by,
Good point about fronting Court - A guy over here put down his own injured dog with a hammer - three blows and the dog died without undue distress.
A witness reported the matter to the RSPCA who in turn charged the man with agg cruelty and he fronted Court.
The case was dismissed when expert evidence was called (Vet) stating the dog would have been in extreme pain and the owner having no other option decided to put it down. The vet further stated that the first blow would have been fatal and any further bodily movement of the dog would have been caused by muscle spasm.
At last, a good result from a Court.
FollowupID:
486358
Follow Up By: Member - Oldplodder (QLD) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 17:27
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 17:27
Good point DIO.
I always use that good rule of the sea when driving, it is the repsonsibility of the vessel to avoid collision at all costs.
So if there are roos around I slow down.
If you miss them, the issue doesn't arise.
But I know it always that simple, I have hit a few (maybe 6 or so ) in my time.
FollowupID:
486360
Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 17:47
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 17:47
>If the track came close to private property, then you were
>probably in a designated forest or national park. IF you were in
>possession of a firearm, you are probably breaking the rules (law).
DIO:
You seem to be suffering from a serious misunderstanding of the law in relation to firearms possession - at least in Victoria, where Robin lives and, I assume, the incident took place.
A person is permitted to be in possession of and use a firearm in State Forests for the purpose of hunting vermin, in areas of certain National Parks in Vic one is also permitted to possess and use a firearm.
I assume you're a target shooter? Do you actually spend much time in _remote_ bush?
Mike Harding
FollowupID:
486364
Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 19:58
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 19:58
A followup post caused me to re-read this thread and I'm glad I did because I had missed the following from DIO:
>Everday wildlife somewhere suffers injury, is left to suffer - fend
>for itself most times without intervention from some
well
>meaning passerby. That's life.
"That's life"! - is it really? And you always choose to look away, do you? Providing you're OK all is
well in the world, eh?
Of course animals in the wild suffer - they don't subscribe to Medicare.
It is exactly this kind of mentality which walks aways from animals/people who need help. I can't save the world DIO but, sure as hell, I'll do what I can, as most would - and the majority of responses to this thread suggest.
Mike Harding
FollowupID:
486402
Follow Up By: DIO - Tuesday, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:23
Tuesday, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:23
Looks like I've struck a cord with the red-necks and cowboys. Gee they've got thin skins, can't accept criticism of any kind. Attitudes and actions of some will only lead to tighter firarms laws and even more restrictions on ownership - for law abiding responsible people.
As for Mike Farding, you can't change nature and what happens in nature. You can only interfere with it. Man's reputation at doing that is miserable to say the least.
What a stupid statement - animals don't subscribe to Medicare. Everyone knows that.
Well I'm off to have my tablets. G'night boys.
FollowupID:
486465
Reply By: Robin - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:28
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:28
Hi Guys
I'll add a few more points raised by 2 or 3 people.
Not looking for firearms debate Dio , but for you I was legal.
I won't be claiming any moral high ground in this.
I was in a Vic.
state forest and it was just an incident that happened
I feel its worth discussing ones reactions to the circumstances as presented.
In my opinion, while animals weren't being chased I believe it was
vehicle that set them off.
At least one teenager had attended there first funeral day before making
me more aware of sensitivites than usual.
Doug, I was brought up by being given 3 bullets each night after getting
home
from school and expected to bring back at least 1 rabbit (cleaned ) for tea
each night. (I'll close this today because I'm off to
Perth for rest of week
and I expect you to do something about that 40c stuff before I arrive tomorrow)
Robin Miller
AnswerID:
225385
Reply By: whyallacookie - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:47
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:47
It's a hard one. My
young kids (4 and 2) travel with us and regardless of the "we grew up all right) line, which is what I grew up with I wuld probably leave them in the car same as I have done previously and also at car accidents) and deal with it. I hate putting an animal out of it's misery and have only had to do it once about 300km from any civilisation.
It is a judgement call, sometimes you trysafely to get them out and leave nature to takes it course, sometimes that's not an option or the animal is too badly injured.
Whilst I agree I don't think carrying a firearm in that situation is appropriate I'll defend your right to do so.
AnswerID:
225389
Reply By: The Explorer - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:03
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:03
Hello - guy I know was in a similar situation - he could not think of any way do put the animal down so he strangled it - funny thing is one night several years later (on the p*ss) he tried to strangle me! Anyway - best course of action would have been to use the fastest way of dispatching the animal as you had available, so in your case - the gun. I would have suggested the teenagers look the other way, if I thought they may be traumatised by seeing it happen. Whether or not you should have had a gun in the first place is a different issue.
Cheers
Greg
| I sent one final shout after him to stick to the track, to which he replied “All right,” That was the last ever seen of Gibson - E Giles 23 April 1874 Lifetime Member My Profile My Blog Send Message Moderator |
AnswerID:
225392
Reply By: Glenn WA - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 13:05
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 13:05
Robin,
Lesson in life.
When I was about 12 or 13 I went roo shooting (for pet food use) for the first time with friends of the family.
A roo was dropped but was still kicking when we aproached it. My mates old man picked up a lump of wood and donged it hard enough to make it stop moving.
He then slippped his hand in the pouch and pulled out a pinky with no fur, calmly walked over to a fence post and I watched in horror as the little joey's head went rolling on the dirt.
The roo was hind quarted and then cut up and put in packs for the dogs.
That was something that I have remembered, with no bad effects, its just a lesson about life and death.
Never had a problem trapping,skinning, eating rabbits either I used to love the adventure.
I think all kids growing up should be aware of what it takes !!!!
AnswerID:
225405
Follow Up By: Member - Davoe (Nullagine) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 14:13
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 14:13
i would have thought that was normal for most people, certainly was for me. Just part of growing up in Australia
FollowupID:
486311
Follow Up By: Stu050 - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 22:54
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 22:54
X2.
Been there, done that.
FollowupID:
486441
Reply By: Moose - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 14:56
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 14:56
G'day Robin
I'm in the "put it out of its misery asap"
camp. No sense letting the poor thing suffer. The kids should be able to appreciate that it is better to minimise suffering - my two teenagers both do, even the one who wants to be a vet and loves all critters.
Cheers from the Moose
AnswerID:
225435
Reply By: V8Diesel - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 15:06
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 15:06
Act decisively and shoot it quickly and discretely. I hate seeing animals hurt in any way but this is the kindest and quickest option by a long way. Be very careful as roos are still dangerous animals even when severely injured.
If you shoot them you should not have any bystanders standing around anyway for safety's sake. It is not a bit of light entertainment. Ensure everyone is sitting in the vehicle and ready to go. Make absolutely certain where and what your back stop is if full penetration occurs. Explain to the teenagers this is is a very unpleasant duty but none the less it's life and that the way it goes sometimes.
If on the road I run them over straight away and drag the carcass off the road.
I find it distressing but it is simply a fact of life when travelling in rural Australia.
AnswerID:
225436
Reply By: Member - Brian H (QLD) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 16:35
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 16:35
Well I don't own a gun and most likely never will, I'm not against guns just don't feel I need one (or ever hope I should)
Dispatch as quick as possible, I would not like to do it but the other option of letting the animal die a slow death would be worse.
As for the kids ........ couple of choices 1. explain why you have to dispatch the animal and what needs to be done and basiclly thats life move on. OR 2. just dispatch the animal and say it had to be done you don't want the animal to suffering and leave.
Brian
AnswerID:
225450
Reply By: Brew69(SA) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 17:08
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 17:08
Large stick or a hammer.
AnswerID:
225452
Reply By: Member - Dedalus (SA) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 17:30
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 17:30
Here in K.I. we have to deal with this problem every day .... sometime with europeans passengers on board!
They don't like the fact sometime we hate to kill the poor kangaroo injuried by a car or a truck.
But I usually explain them how the ravens eating your eyes when you still alive if you are the kangaroo in question ....
Then they usually agree on what sould I do ....
If you are an animal injuried ... on the road ....
Think about
Luca
AnswerID:
225454
Follow Up By: Andrew from Vivid Adventures - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 19:46
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 19:46
Feel for you Luca.
Been in precisely that situation hot footing it from the Western end of the island to the hairport ... with pax on board.
And again in December same story.
Reversing over it on the road is the quickest way.
If it's stuck in the fence with broken leg, whatever the quickest way is - knife, axe, spade ... and I don't have a gun.
FollowupID:
486397
Follow Up By: Member - Dedalus (SA) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 20:43
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 20:43
I don't have fire arms .... I have a multitool knife but I don'l like bood ....
I have seen doin it once with a knife .... very quick and effective !
I usually use my truck's jack's extention right on his nek ... NO BLOOD, NO PAIN ...
Fell miserable for few mins. after but I know this is the right think to do in this situation ...
Unfurtunally seen some time ago an idiot turist driving like an "idiot" and colliding with a kangaroo.
Car wad dammaged (radiator kaput!), he was stuck in the middle of the toad whit a big kangaroo male in agony .... I have to do "the job" in front of him + whife + childrens . He told me off sayng he is calling the animal protection association .... I gave him my name and tel. # ... I still waiting for the call ....
FollowupID:
486413
Reply By: luch - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 18:16
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 18:16
I have been told that Roos are just like Horses, not much can be done.
But to humainly destroy the animal
AnswerID:
225467
Reply By: Member - Phillip S (WA) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 18:16
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 18:16
HI...A mate and I with our wives came upon a very similar situation, a full grown roo busted by a vehicle on the side of the highway, still very much alive and alert but with a busted leg and so unable to move and at the mercy with everything.
We told the women to stay away. and my mate and I set about being as humane as possible in putting it to sleep. What we did was as I distracted it's attention, My mate snuck up from behind and......, it did not know what happened, it quick and painless when you think of the slow death it would have endured with crows and the like etc.
Working in the mining industry I see this often and I always choose the path of mercy with the least amont of pain. regards Phil
AnswerID:
225468
Reply By: Oldsquizzy (Kununurra) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 18:21
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 18:21
Shoot it or use an axe. And hope the roo will do the same for you if in the same prediciment.....grin
AnswerID:
225470
Follow Up By: Oldsquizzy (Kununurra) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 18:23
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 18:23
Mind you after doing this the wife said that it was a law to remove tail for stew...Must be some type of penance.
FollowupID:
486374
Reply By: Bilbo - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 18:33
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 18:33
Now, I'm not having a go at anyone here. This comment is just a generalised insight of our double standards.
Bloomin' marvellous ain't it.
We let our kids play "bang,bang, blood 'n guts splatter" reality PC games, but we shouldn't let 'em see anything that's actually a real death.
Geezusss!
Bilbo
AnswerID:
225477
Follow Up By: Bilbo - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 18:43
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 18:43
Oh yeah - and we let 'em watch violent garbage such as the films"Wolfe Creek" and "Texas Chainsaw Massacre".
But don't whatever you do let 'em see blood and snot in real life. Oh no, that would never do would it.
No wonder they get de-sensitised to violence and they grow up thinking blood doesn't stick and bullets don't hurt people.
Oh yes and BTW - I would have shot the 'roo.
Bilbo
FollowupID:
486383
Follow Up By: Member - Dunworkin (WA) - Tuesday, Mar 06, 2007 at 00:28
Tuesday, Mar 06, 2007 at 00:28
Bilbo, that is just about what I was thinking as I was reading this post, I can't believe that things of reality can not be explained to teenagers these days, if the kids were a much tender age, different story, but surely we can give the teenagers of today more credit.
BTW Iwould put it out of it's misery ASAP, I can't stand animals in pain.
FollowupID:
486460
Follow Up By: Member - Davoe (Nullagine) - Tuesday, Mar 06, 2007 at 08:15
Tuesday, Mar 06, 2007 at 08:15
from my exprience most teenagers would be begging to let them finish it off!
FollowupID:
486476
Follow Up By: whyallacookie - Tuesday, Mar 06, 2007 at 17:13
Tuesday, Mar 06, 2007 at 17:13
Agree with you totally, however our kids are not allowed those sorts of games. (The eldest boys are only 4 1/2 and are not allowed to watch their uncle's and Aunts play them either). Funny thing is my inlaws turn the channel over if a breast or anything is shown but violent computer games are fine... Go figure!
FollowupID:
486547
Reply By: Im.away - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 19:01
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 19:01
You say "I am going to shoot this 'roo to put it out of its misery. You can either stay and watch or go back to the car and look the other way"
Then let the teenagers make up their own mind. Then do the job. And to all those "You ain't got no business having a gun out there, don't need a gun, shouldn't have a gun" etc etc types....get a life. If you grew up in the bush, you wouldn't go anywhere without one. Sheesh!!!!
AnswerID:
225483
Reply By: Robin - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 20:21
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 20:21
Well I think majority are for "put it out of misery soon as possible".
This I did not do !
This incident happened in front of us and we came to a stop some 10m before it
as it struggled on the fence.
As soon as I saw its broken leg, my thoughts were "There is no hope for it".
There was some small risk of getting hurt if I got to close as it was still
well alive, and I guess I wasn't prepared to shoot it in present company.
So I did nothing just then, minimized the others exposure and drove on.
I knew that track was a dead end with only a kilometer to go and I
would turn back and come past it again.
At dead
end of track we got out of car for a minute and I quietly slipped
the tent hammer into the loose Kevlar bike jacket I was wearing.
About 15min later we came back and the roo looked quieter.
I drove just past it and stopped.
Got out of car and walked quickly up to it, before anyone really noticed much.
As I had suspected and hoped, the roo had died, and I needed to do nothing.
Maybe this was a cop out. I certainly wasn't looking forward to killing it
and am glad I didn't have to.
As said earlier, no moral high ground stuff, the circumstances presented
themselves and just did what seemed best at the time.
Robin Miller
AnswerID:
225500
Follow Up By: Member - Michael J (SA) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 21:27
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 21:27
Was a cop out Robin.
Michael
FollowupID:
486428
Reply By: Member - Jeff H (QLD) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 22:36
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 22:36
Axe/rifle.
Life's hard. Why endorse suffering? Jeff.
(Just don't drive off and leave the poor bastard.)
AnswerID:
225526
Reply By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 22:43
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 22:43
Robin, you used your common sense -
well done.
My prefernce if I had to humanely kill the animal is to put a cable tie around
the neck and do it up tight very quickly.
Rifles, axes, hammers are all pretty messy. I was brought up in country NSW, and learnt at a
young age about shooting roos, rabbits, puigs and chopping the heads off chooks. But for lots of reasons, would never carry a rifle these days.
AnswerID:
225530
Follow Up By: Hairy - Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 23:15
Monday, Mar 05, 2007 at 23:15
Yeh good call but youd want to be bloody careful!
I still carry a gun.
Cheers
FollowupID:
486445
Reply By: Member - Bucky (VIC) - Tuesday, Mar 06, 2007 at 05:35
Tuesday, Mar 06, 2007 at 05:35
Help it out ,,,,, use a tyre lever !
AnswerID:
225556
Reply By: Dingo77 - Friday, Mar 09, 2007 at 11:35
Friday, Mar 09, 2007 at 11:35
Hi Robin,
I've read most of the reply's (but its too long) so if this is already said hen I apologise.
I finally had enough of feeling helpless with regards to assisting injured wildlife so I decided to enroll in a course on wildlife caring. It's run by Wildlife
Victoria whom also conduct training courses throughout the year.
There one in April that focuses on 'Euthanasia and the postmortem for wildlife carers'.
The course topics include:
Euthanasia
How to euthanase humanely
Specific diseases frequently seen
Personal safety
more info can be viewed at:
www.wildlifevictoria.org.au/training.html
I haven't started the carers course yet and they didn't have a problem with me doing the Euthanasia one.
If anyone out there feels the same it wouldn't hurt to visit their website and make your decision from there.
Cheers, Enzo
AnswerID:
226322