Lets CULL EVerthing !

Submitted: Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:13
ThreadID: 44440 Views:2798 Replies:10 FollowUps:29
This Thread has been Archived
It amazes me how us White disease have to kill everything,We've done an excellent job to wipe out the indigenous communities worldwide now its the animals turn..
I havnt been to Frazer Island but the dingo's there are legendary and i know they can bite so to let a four old out the car without supervision is plain ludicrous,Idiodic and the parents should be put down not the dingo who's been here for thousands of years,weve been here about 200 years and we own the joint like every other country we've invaded...

The Great white shark bites people (in their domain mind you) and andrew bolt from the sun says kill them all we dont need them, stop them from biting more people and so in future families wont have to pine for lost ones,i know i recieved a couple emails from him,after i sent him one stopping just short of calling him an idiot...

The seal jumps up and bites a female while she is in a boat in their domain again,so what do we hear



CULL CULL CULL (lets get the b@#$#stard)

The government should have BALLS and declare your in their domain and if you get eaten,bitten,licked or r#*ted etc etc Stiff bleep E - whether its ocean or land instead of the american way of life and scared of being sued...

Im by far an animal liberationist but wouldnt it be interesting if animals come up with a MACHINE GUN they could use ! lol

Cheers
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Peter 2 - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:33

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:33
Back in the early 80's when you could camp right at Yellow Waters in Kakadu we told a woman who was letting here kids play near the waters edge that she should get them away from the water because of the crocs.
She went right off even to the stage of having a go at the ranger about how the NP was for people and they shouldn't have dangerous wild animals there!!
Let nature take its course I say.
AnswerID: 234172

Reply By: Willem - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:34

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:34
You can replace WHITE with MAN

The aborigines were just as destructive to this land over their time here. Setting fire to the bush and possibly also causing the extinction of the mega fauna. Look what Alexaner the Great did to Asia Minor. Or what Cortez did to the South Americans. It goes on ad infinitum.

I agree that culling animals when we veture into their domain and get bitten is a stupid idea.

Wasn't there a song about Cows with guns and Chickens in Choppers...lol

Cheers
AnswerID: 234173

Follow Up By: Waynepd (NSW) - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 10:27

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 10:27
Yep Willem
that was Dennis Leary.... what a visionary he is LOL.
Thanks for reminding me of that song Cows with Guns HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHA
0
FollowupID: 495055

Follow Up By: gav99x - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 12:54

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 12:54
Think you'll find it was Dana Lyons...

www.cowswithguns.com/homepage.html
0
FollowupID: 495088

Follow Up By: Member - Toytruck (SA) - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 13:00

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 13:00
Willem,
I disagree with the fire being distructive bit. Most of the native flora requires fire or heat to ensure the new seeds can open and therefore produce new growth. Keep in mind the fires back then were small grass fires as there was no build up of undergrowth. These days due to the build up of undergrowth the fires are much more intense and therefore destructive.

I really don't think the poor old Aborigine was as destructive to the environment as modern man.

I must add I am definately not a greenie, far from it.

Toytruck
0
FollowupID: 495089

Follow Up By: Hairy - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 17:28

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 17:28
Toytruck,
Problem is they are still lighting them!
Cheers
0
FollowupID: 495160

Follow Up By: Waynepd (NSW) - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 17:33

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 17:33
Thanks for the correction Gav,
i downloaded it as an MP3 in the last 6 months or so and it was flagged as Dennis Leary so i took it as being named correctly.
0
FollowupID: 495163

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 17:34

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 17:34
"I really don't think the poor old Aborigine was as destructive to the environment as modern man"

Probably only due to lack of numbers.
0
FollowupID: 495164

Follow Up By: Member - Toytruck (SA) - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 17:52

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 17:52
Gramps,
yep you are possibly right but even still, they lived here for many thousands of years and treated the land as if it were their mother, the traditional aborigine's I am talking about. Even they were smart enough to realise that their livelihood depended on the land so had had to look after it or they would perish.

I am still not a Greenie :-) but as I have mentioned on this forum previously....I am an Aborigine. Seriously, I do have a lot of respect for the traditional people and living in todays society, totally understand the arguments that souround the Aborigine people, but I digress, the original thread was about todays society not the past. I do feel Footloose was a bit harsh on distinguishing colour as the governing factor and maybe could have been a little more generic but...that's life.

Toytruck
0
FollowupID: 495172

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 18:04

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 18:04
Toytruck,

"treated the land as if it were their mother" just like all so called 'primitive' races (and I mean no disrespect by that). Then of course, we superadvanced wallies (who just happened to be of a paler complexion) come along and say "Nah, you lot have no idea. We'll show you how to r$%%@t the place well and truly. We've had many years of experience at it" hahahaha

The amount of damage done is governed by the resources at hand to do the damage.
0
FollowupID: 495179

Follow Up By: Member - Toytruck (SA) - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 18:19

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 18:19
Gramps,
I know this sounds like a cop out but it's just progress. Humans come to realise they make money from trade but to trade we need to sell something. In the past we used to trade spears and tools, now with much bigger economies we need to trade more to earn more money. These days we have come to realise that below the groung there are precious resources that some countries, mainly China, will pay LOTS of money for but to get at it we have to dig the place up. Digging the place up makes a mess but it creates wealth and employment so we dig up some more, and so on, and so on.

We all enjoy the creature comforts, a nice lounge to drink a cold beer on, the wide screen tele to watch. But to get it we all need money so we need jobs........its just one of those cycles that is not going to change. I hate to think what it will be like in another 30 years.

Now I'm feeling all philosophical...I need another beer :-)

Toytruck
0
FollowupID: 495184

Follow Up By: Member - Toytruck (SA) - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 18:19

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 18:19
Gramps,
I know this sounds like a cop out but it's just progress. Humans come to realise they make money from trade but to trade we need to sell something. In the past we used to trade spears and tools, now with much bigger economies we need to trade more to earn more money. These days we have come to realise that below the groung there are precious resources that some countries, mainly China, will pay LOTS of money for but to get at it we have to dig the place up. Digging the place up makes a mess but it creates wealth and employment so we dig up some more, and so on, and so on.

We all enjoy the creature comforts, a nice lounge to drink a cold beer on, the wide screen tele to watch. But to get it we all need money so we need jobs........its just one of those cycles that is not going to change. I hate to think what it will be like in another 30 years.

Now I'm feeling all philosophical...I need another beer :-)
and I carnt b butherd usin thu spull chicker
Toytruck
0
FollowupID: 495185

Follow Up By: Member - Toytruck (SA) - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 18:22

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 18:22
PS I owe Footloose an appulugy, the original thred wus frum Warfer 69.

Sorry Footy was thinking of na thread I had jsut read.

Toytruck
0
FollowupID: 495186

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 19:22

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 19:22
"I hate to think what it will be like in another 30 years"

Don't waste time thinking about it Toytruck. We could both possibly still be around to experience it :))))) Come to think of it, I need another beer (or twelve).
0
FollowupID: 495222

Follow Up By: Grungle - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 21:17

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 21:17
Hi fellow posters. My 2c;

Lighting fires to hunt food is not a natural process of mother nature. The aboriginies at the time did not know that their actions would result in a reduction of combustable material but only that this was an effective way to hunt. What about the hundreds of thousands of animals that died needlessly as a result of this hunger? This is no different to modern day man who uses guns, nets etc to get what they want.

Aside - Germination of seeds triggered by fires was in existance way before there were human footprints in the dirt so this cannot be attributed to what we humans have ever been a part of.

We utilise what we have at hand to make our everyday lives easier. It has been the same for centuries. HOWEVER, we are compelled to have an opinion which is part of who we are and that opinion, more often than not, results in something being targeted due to mass support/protest and usually, something, that was an isolated incident/action, turns out to be a crusification (if there is such a word but it seems appropriate - listen up Macquarie) of a species, religion, age, colour etc.

I am not a hippie, greenie or vegetarian, but I believe in not only looking after what nature has to offer but also supporting it. I also take into consideration what our needs are as a population so I beleive (as the saying goes) in a balance.

Our problem is that we have influenced our environment to such a point that we have determined how things evolve. It is proven that evolution takes place due to environmental changes, whether due to over population, decimation, climate change or whatever but we take it upon ourselves to regulate this. We are taking millions of years of natural progression and giving it rules.

Everyone have seen the shows/movies where people go back in time where they try not to do anything that will change the furture like step on a bug. The belief being that if that was the case that we could have 8 legs and eyes like fly's.

What do you thing we are doing to our future by doing some of the things we do?

If the action seems natural or the result was natural then so it should be. If not the leave it be.

Regards
David
0
FollowupID: 495275

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Thursday, Apr 19, 2007 at 16:19

Thursday, Apr 19, 2007 at 16:19
Grungle,

Can't see much there to disagree with. Undoubtedly someone else will though :))))
0
FollowupID: 495443

Follow Up By: Member - Toytruck (SA) - Thursday, Apr 19, 2007 at 21:12

Thursday, Apr 19, 2007 at 21:12
Grungle,
excellent article. I have had tooo many beers to really grasp it again tonight but it looks great:-) I think.

Toytruck :-)
0
FollowupID: 495526

Reply By: Jimbo Vic - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:46

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:46
We must remember it is their territory we are entering and act accordingly.

I've seen lots of snakes in the bush and treat them with all due respect. Still, some people think "the only good snake's a dead snake".

Theye'd be nothing left if we culled anything that interfered with our supposed priveleged position.
AnswerID: 234174

Reply By: 62woollybugger - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 10:14

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 10:14
Why do we have to speak Kiwi. Lets KILL them, Not KULL them.
AnswerID: 234178

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 16:03

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 16:03
LOL good call :)))))
0
FollowupID: 495136

Follow Up By: Member - Willie , Epping .Syd. - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 18:12

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 18:12
Sex to wooly bugger ? Where are my gum boots ?

That Toynbee's deep aye bro and so is that young Gramps bloke.
0
FollowupID: 495182

Reply By: Notso - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 11:30

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 11:30
Yep well I'm a bit of a believer in the Darwin Awards, take away all the signage etc, stop signs, Red lights, "Do not walk in the area during periods of heavy rain" signs Cliff edge fences, the whole lot. Then we just have to hope that the ones silly enough to do these things and not look where they are walking, driving etc kill emselves off before they get to procreate??
AnswerID: 234190

Reply By: porl - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 12:08

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 12:08
was reading last week that there was an excellent wild scallop fishery of a US coast. So they could swim safely they killed the sharks. Turns out the sharks ate the manta rays that ate the scallops. No more sharks, manta rays increased, no more scallops, industry collapses, and now the manta rays are starving to death.

An example I suppose an often repeated but perhaps not researched consequence of some of our actions.

Mind you the dingoes only come near humans because we've been bloody feeding them of Fraser. Any that gets so familiar with humans that it feels okay to bite them I think does need to be put down, but the original fault lies with us. Dunno if it's true, but the QNPS say there are heaps of dingoes to replace the ones that are put down that hopefully will never develop a familiarity with humans and will always stay their distance.
AnswerID: 234198

Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 17:43

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 17:43
>Mind you the dingoes only come near humans because
>we've been bloody feeding them

EXACTLY!

WOULD PEOPLE _PLEASE_ STOP FEEDING NATIVE ANIMALS!

They don't need it, they are far more capable than you of finding food in the bush and sausage or sliced bread is _not_ a good diet for them. Nor is getting too comfortable with humans - you may not wish to harm them but there are some sick people out there.

There are a few campsites I visit semi-regularly which have enough visitors who feed the animals or leave waste food to have encouraged resident wildlife and this is not good for them.

I dig a kitchen "sump hole" in my sites and ensure all food waste which cannot be burned (washing up water with food scraps - bits of rice from the saucepan etc) as well as soapy hand washing water is poured into the sump. When I leave the sump is filled in.

Mike Harding
0
FollowupID: 495168

Follow Up By: Member - Toytruck (SA) - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 17:59

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 17:59
Mike,
the Chamberlains started the whole "Feeding the Dongo", thing:-)

Toytruck
0
FollowupID: 495177

Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 20:51

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 20:51
What an amusing post... in that case perhaps it's time for the rest of us to stop it - what do you reckon Toytruck?
0
FollowupID: 495256

Reply By: Member - Willie , Epping .Syd. - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 17:25

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 17:25
Your precious dingo is widely believed to have caused the extinction of the thylacine on the Australian mainland . Humans wiped out ( Culled ?) the thylacine in Tasmania . So the difference is ?

It's not a "White disease" .

You are an inarticulate bag of wind . Perhaps we could cull bags of wind after we have fixed up the dingos and great whites .
AnswerID: 234255

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 17:48

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 17:48
W E L L !!!! I'm going to tiptoe very carefully around you on Friday :)))))
0
FollowupID: 495169

Follow Up By: Hairy - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 21:03

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 21:03
I was always told it was the Tasmanians that fu#@%$ the thylacines!..........
Na hang on that was kiwis and sheep????
0
FollowupID: 495271

Follow Up By: warfer69 - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 23:37

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 23:37
*Humans wiped out ( Culled ?) the thylacine in Tasmania* .

Exactly my point

*You are an inarticulate bag of wind . Perhaps we could cull bags of wind*

Oh your a we person, i see !

Cheers
0
FollowupID: 495312

Reply By: Hairy - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 17:43

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 17:43
Here goes nothing!
I don't believe with killing everything that moves but occasionally you do get an animal that attacks people without being provoked. Don't you think it could be possible that you get bad natured animals like you get in humans? If you walked through Redfern and got bashed would you put it down to just being in someone else's domain?
If that was my daughter who got attacked by the sea lion I would want to eat the bastard for dinner?
Things have changed these days, eg. sharks come in closer to shore and behave differently around Pt Lincoln due to Tuna nets and tuna feed, and idiots hand feeding whites off the back of boats.
I don't know what rattled your cage but I think culling or killing is SOMETIMES necessary.
Cheers

AnswerID: 234260

Follow Up By: Crackles - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 18:06

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 18:06
I agree Hairy, sometimes it's better to cull a group of animals that have over bred than have them die a painfull death from lack of feed or water. Many people jump up & down with the slaughter of kangaroo's for example but how sad it was to see thousands of rotting carcass's out in the Sturt National Park during a draught.
As for animals that attack, any that history has shown have an increased chance of attacking human's again should certainly be assessed for being removed or put down.
Cheers Craig...........
0
FollowupID: 495181

Reply By: hiab - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 19:44

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 19:44
american way of life, their motto, if we cant f@#@ it , we'll kill it. same up here if you go swimming where there is crocodiles and get eaten, is it the crocs fault? no in my eyes, the croc is a top predator and if you are in its domain you are not seen as a human you are a meal.
AnswerID: 234294

Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 20:55

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 20:55
>american way of life

Talk about bigotry...?
0
FollowupID: 495262

Follow Up By: hiab - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 20:59

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 20:59
i am very anti the americanisation of australia, they have buggered their country and half the world with their holier than thou attitude, we will not be the 51st, or however many there is, state. constantly maintaining the moral highground while giving it to everybody in the arse. bigoted? you bet
0
FollowupID: 495268

Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 21:34

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 21:34
>bigoted? you bet

Is it just the white Yanks you're bigoted against or don't you like the black ones too?

Mike Harding
0
FollowupID: 495278

Follow Up By: hiab - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 23:12

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 23:12
dont go bringing colour into it, was never mentioned before.
0
FollowupID: 495310

Follow Up By: Juzzy - Thursday, Apr 19, 2007 at 16:15

Thursday, Apr 19, 2007 at 16:15
probably be the 53rd state after they get Israel and Puerto Rico. :)

I think they have gone off Iraq for some reason.
0
FollowupID: 495442

Reply By: Snowy 3.0iTD - Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 21:45

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2007 at 21:45
I hope everyone feels a bit better for getting that off their chests, I shall have to find something to whinge about myself now. LOL.
AnswerID: 234341

Sponsored Links