Should towbar recoveries be banned?

Submitted: Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 15:24
ThreadID: 44637 Views:5563 Replies:23 FollowUps:55
This Thread has been Archived
OK, after reading a previous thread Chris came up with a very good question I thought worthy of its own topic so here it is.

Been reading plenty on a few sites with people gettig worked up about using the towball as a recovery point. We all know about that is a no no, so let's move on however this is even more to the point I reckon.

Why is OK to do a kinetic snatch recovery with even an 8,000kg strap through the receiver pin as is commonly taught, when the Reece hitch is only rated to 3,500kg max????

We all know it works, that's not the point. If it did come off and hit someone and you went before the coroner's court, you have clearly and demonstrably displayed a lack of duty of care by knowingly using a SWL rated item at potentially 2 to 3 times its approved loading with the additional shock factor as an additional consideration. Most full size 4x4's would be around the 3.5T mark to start off with.

Can anyone set me straight on this?
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Robin - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 15:33

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 15:33
Hi V8

First I use towbar / towball recovery on my car and know that its ok.

But that is in my situation and in others it can equally be unsafe.

However , you are starting at the wrong point.

The entire Hayman reece fitting to the car is not rated for snatch strap recovery
as is so advised in the documents - let alone the pin.

Robin Miller

Robin Miller

Member
My Profile  Send Message

AnswerID: 235317

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 17:21

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 17:21
Agreed.
0
FollowupID: 496416

Reply By: Rob from Cairns Offroad Training & Tours - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 16:08

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 16:08
Fear of litigation has every body scared. Best way to protect yourself from operator error or stupidity is to claim your product is not reccommended for such use. How many serious 4wd drivers have not used a tow bar(certainly not a tow ball) in a recovery. IMHO the safest and most secure recovery point on a vehicle. Cheers Rob Berrill.
AnswerID: 235324

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 17:33

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 17:33
I dare say 90% of recoveries use the Reece hitch - me included, but there has been a few threads in various forums with people being outraged about a NATA a towball shackle on sale, yet I find it strange the same people seem to advocate SHOCK loading a non-rated mild steel pin in an assembly rated to a minimum of half the max loading for the kinetic strap in contrary to direct written instructions from the manufacturer.

I don't know.......you're either in the OH&S safety first boat, or not IMO.
0
FollowupID: 496420

Follow Up By: Rob from Cairns Offroad Training & Tours - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 19:31

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 19:31
A snatch strap used correctly is one of the most efficient, inexpensive, compact light weight pieces of recovery gear invented. Sensible commonsense recoveries done at moderate speed with the tow vehicle in low range second gear and the recovered vehicle assisting if possible will nearly always get the job done. Several small snatches are a lot safer than one huge high speed pull. It is important that the vehicles be in as straight a line as possible. An angle greater than 20% will put severe stress on even the stongest recovery point. I have seen a chassis bent when attempting a snatch from a chassis mounted recovery point at a 45% angle. Over the last 10 years as a nationally recognised instuctor I have demonstrated 100s of recoverys using the pin in a tow hitch and the above methods, I have never had any issues whatsoever or experienced a bent pin. My recoveries are done in a straight line with the recovered vehicle bogged axles deep in river sand on an uphill slope. I teach and reccommend this method to all my trainees. IMHO it is far safer with less margin for error than using a drag chain and shackles as a bridle which I have seen in some recoveries from the front of a vehicle. Always let practical commonsense be your guide if you have any doubts about the integrity of any component dont do it. Cheers Rob Berrill
0
FollowupID: 496465

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 19:55

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 19:55
Rob, I personally have no problems with the Reece at all and couldn't give a toss if it's legal or not. I know it works and works bloody well.

I am NOT advocating a ban, just putting up a topic for discussion.

0
FollowupID: 496473

Follow Up By: donnnnny - Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 15:01

Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 15:01
i agree with what you say here rob.the whole toe bar on my old disco was fixed at 6 or 8 points , the pin being the weak link,(Hayman reece covering there perverbial) i f we are in fear of the pin tearing out and being a missile that can kill, use a cable break, as used in recovery with winches. this gives safety and will drop the pin and strap to the ground if such a thing happened and the pin came out.
cheers donnnnny
0
FollowupID: 496683

Reply By: Member - Oldplodder (QLD) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 16:54

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 16:54
Interesting question.

My concern is that a 2500kg rated tow bar (common to most medium and heavier 4wds) is rated to tow a trailer of 2500kg mass. The actual load on the tow ball when pulling is a lot less, since the load is mainly supported by the wheels of the trailer.
Even if you were towing up a 30 degree slope (2 slope to 1 height) the tow bar would have 1250kg load on it from the mass of the trailer.
But the live load from towing a trailer is not the only load. There is also shock loads. Like taking a trailer over a kerb, when the trailer wheels hit the kerb. Most likely a lot more than the tow load when towing up a smooth hill.

So it would be interesting to hear from an engineer, or some one who knows the standards on tow bar design, as to what shock loads are allowed for in a 2500kg rated tow bar. Since a snatch is more of a shock load than a continuous towing load.

I know from designing cranes, there are duty cycles, shock loads, and live loads to be considered in any design. SWL on a crane or crane componment is often 2 to 3 times less than the failure load, depending on duty cycle and it's intended use.
AnswerID: 235333

Follow Up By: Oldsquizzy (Kununurra) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:01

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:01
8 ton snatch straps break more or less at 8 ton force. The stretch factor of 20% is quoted at 50% force (4 tons for our example). Some snatch straps break at a lower, some at a higher force. The straps are 9m long. 20% relates to 1.8m, and assuming a linear spring constant in the elasticity of the strap, elongation, or stretch, will be 3.6m at a force of 8 tons.

Now F= k x s, where F = force (Newtons), s = distance (stretch) and k = spring constant.

Therefore k = F/s = 4000kg x 9.81 / 1.8m
==> k = 21800N/m

To calculate the stored energy and resultant forces in the snatch strap, we need to determine what the kinetic energy of the recovery vehicle is at the point where the snatch trap has enough force to stop it, ie at the point where the injected kinetic energy equals the stored potential energy in the strap.

The kinetic energy of the vehicle = 0.5 x m x v^2 (^2 = squared),
and the strain energy in the strap = 0.5 x F x s

Therefore, at v=17km/hr (4.72m/s), m=2300kg, and k=21800N/m,
the vehicle kinetic energy = 25644 Nm

Now, at this point, the strap strain energy = induced kinetic energy by the recovery vehicle

==> 0.5 x F x s = 0.5 x m x v^2

==> s = sqrt(m x v^2 / k) = 1.53m stretch

Therefore, the force exerted is
F = k s = 21800 x 1.53 = 3.41 tons.

0
FollowupID: 496565

Follow Up By: Oldsquizzy (Kununurra) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:02

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:02
In other words oops can be produced using the towball.
0
FollowupID: 496567

Follow Up By: Member - John (Vic) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:04

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:04
Yep I knew that all along. :-)
VKS737 - Mobile 6352 (Selcall 6352)

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 496570

Follow Up By: Oldsquizzy (Kununurra) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:07

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:07
LOL....didnt say it would be oops said it can be. And I am just as guilty of the slip it over the ball to pull through sand as any one else.
0
FollowupID: 496571

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:08

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:08
Ahhhhaaaa...........but F=ma so a 3.5 tonne 4x4 accelerating at a slightly higher rate will increase the force significantly and not forgeting the half mv squared factor either!

Is that not so?

The prosecution rests;-)
0
FollowupID: 496572

Follow Up By: Oldsquizzy (Kununurra) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:10

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:10
This force assumes that the snatch strap has a 20% elongation at 50% load. Tests have shown that some snatch straps only have 15% elongation, which would mean that for these the exerted force would be 4.5 tons instead of the calculated 3.41 tons. If we add a V8 at the same vehicle mass with a higher speed to the equation, the forces will be much higher.
0
FollowupID: 496574

Follow Up By: Oldsquizzy (Kununurra) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:14

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:14
But as a cure for boredom on a monday night equations are a tad of fun as you can make them say much what you want.
0
FollowupID: 496576

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:14

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:14
At this stage the prosecution calls for an adjournment until he can remember more of his high school physics lessons.

I knew it would come in handy one day!
0
FollowupID: 496577

Follow Up By: Oldsquizzy (Kununurra) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:17

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:17
Nah...Common sense prevails most of the time and you know what your vehicle is capable of. Just thought I would see if it was possible to work it out. There are so many variables, rust, fatigue, heat and how many beers have been consumed.
0
FollowupID: 496578

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:20

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:20
Hey Oldsquizzy, is that dairy on the road to Ivanhoe still making those deluxe banana milkshakes? Lived in Kunnunurra for a while and they were a real treat. Picked melons and then got a real job at Oliver Ford as a mechanic. Great memories but it would have to be 17 years since last there.

And the Bridbangbidilyongtongbangbong bar and the Hotel Kunnurra 'Sportsmens's Bar'. The Four Star Cafe.

Do the Youngs still run the town?
0
FollowupID: 496579

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:22

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:22
Had a couple of wooblahs tonight myself as a matter of fact, might be beddie byes for me.
0
FollowupID: 496581

Follow Up By: Oldsquizzy (Kununurra) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:23

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:23
Yeah you can still get milkshakes and the Birchs are the ones to watch around town nowadays and the hotel is still going strong
0
FollowupID: 496582

Reply By: robak (QLD) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 16:58

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 16:58
V8

The resistance to pull push does not equel the wight of the vehicle. A human being can push a 3t car when on the blacktop and there's no way they'd exert anywhere near 3t of force. I think most recoveries would be within the 3.5 t range

But back to your point though. Yes, perhaps the snatch strap should be weaker then recovery point / towbar, or be attached to a "weakest link" which fails at 3.5t.

Actually such a weak link with an inbuilt air brake might be a very good (bussiness) idea.

R.
AnswerID: 235335

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 17:25

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 17:25
True to a certain degree, but in thick mud for example or below the water line in the ocean situations I could easily imagine the forces being huge. When they get stuck down to the gunwhales, man do they get stuck.
0
FollowupID: 496418

Follow Up By: Member - andrew B (Kununurra) - Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 12:57

Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 12:57
Yep V8, I had 2 brocken snatch straps and $2500.00 damage to a strangers car (which of course I organised the repairs and paid) to boot in that scenario....won't go anywhere without the high lift jack again!

Cheers Andrew
0
FollowupID: 496655

Reply By: disco1942 - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 17:24

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 17:24
Tow bars are not rated for a straight pull. They are rated to accept stresses in three dimensions over an extended period where a fatigue factor comes in to play. The plate and tubing in a tow bar are much more substantial than the structure of the vehicles to which they are attached. They are also attached at multiple points.

Comparing tow ball failure and tow bar failure are two different things. The failure of tow bars failing during a recovery is not heard of. They probably do not happen or if they do they only damage the vehicle, not bystanders. Tow ball failures do get reported because they do happen and when they do the ball goes a long way at high speed. If a tow bar fails then only one end fails and there is no flying metal so there is no danger to personnel. Any failure will only cause danger to the vehicle to which it is attached.

Is there anyone out there that can quote a confirmed case where a tow bar failure has presented a danger to people or vehicles??????

PeterD
PeterD
Retired radio and electronics technician

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

AnswerID: 235341

Follow Up By: Member - Luke (SA) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:35

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:35
I think you have a pretty strong point there Peter.

Before I read your reply I was thinking about asking the same question.

Cheers Luke
0
FollowupID: 496522

Reply By: DIO - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 17:46

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 17:46
'The art of precision four wheel driving is to avoid situations that might cause the vehicle to become disabled.' (For the slow one - no go forward - no go backwards).

The recovery gear market/industry is aimed at all those mugs who just can't help themsleves, go places they shouldn't and do things smart drivers avoid. The remainder are dazzled by all the bright shiny stuff must just have the gear to embelish the appearance of their trucks.

Memorable words of Army Driving Instructor to trainees during off-road training course c1966
AnswerID: 235343

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 17:54

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 17:54
Righto.
0
FollowupID: 496423

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:13

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:13
That'd be why all the army Landrovers, Acco's, Unimogs, Macks etc etc etc have winches then?
0
FollowupID: 496430

Follow Up By: Member - MrBitchi (QLD) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:41

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:41
Main reason for said winches is that the tactical situation sometimes demands going where you shouldn't really go ;-) Using a winch is often the quickest way out. Can also be used to haul heavy loads (artillery pieces etc) into position.
0
FollowupID: 496440

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:16

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:16
>>Memorable words of Army Driving Instructor to trainees during off-road training course c1966

and as stupid today as it was C1966...
0
FollowupID: 496487

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:23

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:23
Truckie, your turn to stir the pot now.

Over to you.
0
FollowupID: 496583

Reply By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 17:53

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 17:53
OK, we've had a few "she'll be rights" (I'm one of them BTW) but who here would be prepared to stake their house and savings on it being legal? That's what it'd be in the courts, make no mistake. It's a black and white issue, simple as that.

Once again for the record, I use this technique all the time without problem but that's not my point. It got me thinking when reading some recent posts about using non-rated recovery points and many viewers jumping up and down together and pointing the finger baying for blood, yet I wonder how many of them would happily hook up from the back at a non-rated point? It must be illegal as the manufacturer does not rate them for this useage, and even warns against using them as such and the stamped plate clearly shows a non shock rated SWL which is far (150%) below possible requirements.

How many 4x4 clubs and training organisations vehemently insist on rated hooks at the front, yet happily forget all that at the rear? Even the rated inserts aren't worth a pinch of goat poo if they aren't hooked up to a legal, rated recovery point.

Food for serious thought and hopefully some constructive discussion.
AnswerID: 235346

Follow Up By: Chris & Debbie - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:41

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:41
You mention rated hooks and recovery point and that many clubs insist on these ratings, but how many are correctly attached to the vehicle and then certified for that load rating? So unless people have had these hooks load tested and certified after fitting them they should not be pointing the finger at anyone.
Chris
0
FollowupID: 496441

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 19:56

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 19:56
Another good point Chris!
0
FollowupID: 496474

Reply By: Willem - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 17:53

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 17:53
V8

Who is going to to police towbar or towball recoveries??

All the technical data aside I would use what is necessary to recover my vehicle or that of a mate.

I know that there is a saying that commonsense no longer exists but I try to use it when doing recoveries and err on the safety side of any recovery.

I do not travel in a crowd because I have been there and done that with bleep idiots or galahs in private convoys or in club convoys.

I do not have a snatch strap but rely on my winch or Hi Lift jack to extricate the vehicle from a bog situation.

Cheers
AnswerID: 235347

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:08

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:08
Willem, I agree with you 100% but my point was to raise this as a discusion topic following on from the recent bullbar and towball shackle threads.

I've done many, many non-rated recoveries (what did we do 20 years ago???) to the extent of pulling 6 wheeler trucks and tractors out and just exercised common sense (it's got me this far) without too many dramas (touch wood). I don't consider myself the anti-christ for doing so either, but some folks would call for me to be burnt alive at the stake for doing them, yet in the same breath happily do what appears to be exactly the same thing from a Recce hitch. I find it surprising some clubs advocate leaving bogged people if they don't have rated points as well.

I'm not advocating it, I'm interested in the responses, that's all. I may have missed something glaringly obvious too which is highly likely.

(BTW see my response to re: the 'clubs' question a few hours ago too;-)))
0
FollowupID: 496428

Follow Up By: Willem - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:23

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:23
OK Karl... didn't mean to hi jack the principle

DON'T USE TOWBALLS AS ANCHOR POINTS FOR SNATCHING.........LOL
0
FollowupID: 496434

Follow Up By: Member - Matt M (ACT) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 19:08

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 19:08
Satellites Willem, satellites.

They can spot anything nowadays.
0
FollowupID: 496451

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 19:57

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 19:57
and don't forget the miniature electronic bugs in your fillings.......
0
FollowupID: 496475

Follow Up By: Hairy - Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:48

Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:48
Ill Police it Willem,

The Rules.
1. If you want to you can, if you get hurt its your fault.
2. If you dont want to you dont have to therefore it doesnt concern you.
3. If you see someone else doing it, move away.

For those who regulary say there needs to be a law for everything and no laws should be broken, follow the above rules and you will be alright. If you found yourself to be breaking one of the rules post a $100 cheque to :
Hairy
Po box 6546986583
Alice Springs
0871
and your concience will be clear

Cheers
0
FollowupID: 496626

Follow Up By: Member - Matt M (ACT) - Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:52

Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:52
Hairy,

The last thing we need is an outbreak of common sense in these types of debates!

Shame on you. Fine yoursefl $100 dollars and do not pass go.

Matt.
0
FollowupID: 496627

Follow Up By: Hairy - Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:00

Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:00
Cheques in the Mail!! LOL
Cheers
0
FollowupID: 496630

Reply By: Member - Andrew (QLD) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:21

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:21
The fact that Mitsubishi has come out and said that recoverying a pajero (not that it ever happens) using the towbar (in their case i assume the genuine one) is safe, especially when looking at the monocoque construction, is good enough in any coroners court when dealing with similar situations IMO.

Using recognised recovery techniques, especially leaving small amounts of slack to begin with, i would be surprised to see an issue pop up in the courts. With this alledged issue being so common (recoverying with towbars) surely there must have a case where someone was injured or worse, and it has been through the system? After all these years, surely there has been a precedent set with such a case?
If not, why?

Andrew

AnswerID: 235353

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:02

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:02
So you'd say using 1. overloaded 2. non-rated recovery points directly against 3. written manufacturers instructions would be OK as there hasn't been a precedent set?

Would you class the above as a 'recognized recovery technique'? If so, by whom?

Care to stake your house on that?

Once again I point out I personally don't give a rats, just playing devil's advocate here.
0
FollowupID: 496478

Follow Up By: Member - Andrew (QLD) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:13

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:13
How do you know they are overloaded if they are not rated?

I'm saying my vehicle manufacturer has tested them using the same equipment i use ie. towbar, so i am happy with the equipment. Using a genuine towbar in my case, and referencing the vehicle manufacturer as saying that it is safe to recover using the towbar, not the towball incidentally (opens up another thread :-)), is my defense....and i will bet my house on it in this case.

I wouldn't bet against a manufacturer (towbar or vehicle) if forced, however who would win if pitted against each other in a court?

BTW i have never seen any written instructions from the manufacturer of the towbar, only from the vehicle manufacturer......sort of a genuine v's after-market issue in the case i mention.

Thanks for playing devils drinking partner.

Andrew
0
FollowupID: 496513

Reply By: Mike Harding - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:26

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:26
Life is a risk - no one gets out of it alive.

I'll just continue to exercise my best judgement in these situations and if anyone tries to sue me (about 10,0000:1 against, in reality, I suspect) I'll transfer all my assets to my sons and go bankrupt: easy - and they can pay their own legal fees.

If every time I went bush I had to consult a lawyer I'd give it up!

Mike Harding
AnswerID: 235356

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:05

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:05
Mike, it honestly don't worry me none - I'm just playing devils advocate (as I'm prone to do) and raising a topic for discussion.

I endorse risk taking behaviour in this sterile and cotton wooled, nanny state society we now have to live in.
0
FollowupID: 496482

Reply By: Exploder - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:53

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:53
I will come out and say, if a tow bar that is attached to both sides of the chassis with mutable high tensile steel bolts and is built of heaver gauge steel than the chassis it self is not capable of supporting a recovery then what the hell is?

The Tow hitch is probably the most over built part of the car structure.

So what we all think that a recovery hook that is attached to one end of a chassis rail with what 4 Bolts at the very most is a better option. ????

My Money is on the Reece hitch holding over a pussy little recovery hook that has been secured with 2-4 bolts on one end of the rail.

As for legalities I would say 90% off the stuff that is done in a 4WD is well out side OH&S guidelines.

Cheers.

AnswerID: 235363

Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:58

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:58
There is nothing wrong with a little pussy - a friend of mine has two small kittens.
0
FollowupID: 496450

Follow Up By: ross - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 19:22

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 19:22
It would only apply where it happens in a workplace which is a place where paid work is occuring
0
FollowupID: 496458

Follow Up By: Exploder - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:48

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:48
Yeah I know that, joist pointing out that a lot of thighs we do when 4WD doesn’t comply with safety standards or procedures
0
FollowupID: 496504

Follow Up By: Bware (Tweed Valley) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:03

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:03
Exploder, was that a Freudian slip; 'a lot of thighs' after reading Mr Harding's comment about a little pussy?
0
FollowupID: 496537

Follow Up By: Exploder - Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 20:04

Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 20:04
Could have been, but I would ahve to say I don’t like pussy bolted to a chassis rail.
0
FollowupID: 496757

Reply By: T-Ribby - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 19:39

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 19:39
In the days before straps I used a rope, single double or even triple to pull someone out of the mud, and never hurt anyone because the rope broke before it got to the dangerous stage.
Different story today but I think the same principle should apply.
cheers
T.Rib
AnswerID: 235381

Reply By: Member - Jack - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:34

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:34
Ban nothing .. and let people sort it out for themselves. Everytime you ban something you get another piece of useless legislation .. another body of public servants/bureaucrats ot monitor it, and if there is another of it, another government department and a minister to oversee it.

I am still arguing the case against swimming pool fences which I see as nothing more than an aid for poor parenting. If you don't know where your kids are, or have not taught them to swim, then be prepared to accept the consequences. Don't expect me to fund your tardiness.

Apologies for straying off topic, but the word "ban" tends to raise the old hackles.

Jack
The hurrieder I go, the behinder I get. (Lewis Carroll-Alice In Wonderland)

Member
My Profile  My Position  Send Message

AnswerID: 235408

Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:45

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:45
We should meet for a beer jack :)
0
FollowupID: 496502

Follow Up By: Member - Jack - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:55

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:55
Hi Mike:

Now that is one thing I know would be an absolute pleasure :)

Jack
The hurrieder I go, the behinder I get. (Lewis Carroll-Alice In Wonderland)

Member
My Profile  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 496507

Follow Up By: Brian T (VIC) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:58

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:58
Would that beer drinking arm be legally load rated though?
And what is the rated duty cycle of said arm as per the manufacturers specs.

0
FollowupID: 496535

Follow Up By: Bware (Tweed Valley) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:44

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:44
Jack, you can't go spouting common sense ideas like that; society is not ready for it!
0
FollowupID: 496556

Reply By: Mark- Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:09

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:09
When a tow ball is used for a recovery, the ball thread is loaded in shear.
When the receiver pin in a tow bar is used for a recovery the pin is loaded in (double) shear.

So given that a a ball thread has at least 2.5 times the cross sectional area (and therefore strength, assuming similar metallurgy) surely the ball is a lot less likely to fail than a receiver pin?

I agree that IF a ball fails, thats a big chunk of metal flying through the air. However, those that throw up their arms in horror at the thought of a tow ball reovery are overreacting - they can be used safely as long as common sense is also used.......
AnswerID: 235420

Reply By: Member - Steve T (NT) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:53

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:53
Hey guys.

I've been guilty of putting the strap trough the pin on a treg hitch.

After lots of digging and lifting and log placing I also used the Toyota recovery points on the front of the 100 series to pull a 6.5 tonne OKA out of a bog as well.

Desperate things called for desperate measures.

Any way found these.

www.beaver.com.au/news18.htm - 20k -
Site Link - 12k -

Cheers Steve.
AnswerID: 235435

Reply By: Member - 'Lucy' - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:04

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:04
If all you 'pajeros' owned/drove a JEEP - you wouldn't have to have this conversation
AnswerID: 235440

Reply By: Bware (Tweed Valley) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:34

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:34
Mr V8, you've done well; you haven't incited a bleep fite!

I agree with your sentiments here and in your replies to the other threads. I would like to make the point that if we open the door for laws/regulations on recovery equipment where does it end? Can't leave the black-top without a special liscence? Can't leave home without an EPIRB?

I'm in the 'common sense goes a long way' camp. :-)))
AnswerID: 235446

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:04

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:04
I'm still waiting for the flaming poo nazi to leap from behind a behind a bush and appraise combustion of the bog roll and hole depth when I'm next laying a cable or the Stalin of tyre pressures to chastise me as an eco vandal for not dropping my pressures 2lbs on the Paynes Find to Sandstone gravel road.

Welcome to our campsite Bware, plenty of room here and getting quieter by the day;-))))
0
FollowupID: 496569

Reply By: _gmd_pps - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:54

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:54
well I guess it's a matter of rating ..

I have a towbar with 2 receivers 2.5" and 2" mounted above each other
the towbar is rated at 7 Tonnes .. the ball with a 1 1/2" shank is rated at
6.5T and the hitch is buffered with an airbag ... so I would have NO hesitation
to snatch a jap 4by out of the mud on the ball if I really had to ...

otherwise I use my 8t recovery hooks

have fun
gmd
AnswerID: 235449

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:25

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:25
Mog?
0
FollowupID: 496584

Reply By: _gmd_pps - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:27

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:27
oh sorry .. mistake ... the towbar is actually rated at 7.5 t 17,000lbs to be exact.
have fun
gmd
AnswerID: 235451

Follow Up By: _gmd_pps - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:35

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:35
here is a pic with the 28" extension mounted
with the weight distribution mounted I can tow 12,000lbs at 28" extended from
the tow bar
have fun

http://www.ozshops.com/P1110012.JPG

gmd
0
FollowupID: 496586

Reply By: Member - Davoe (Nullagine) - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:48

Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:48
Theres what you should do.................and what you actuallydo.
I was bogged on the beach with waves washing under the 4by Guy stops and Icrack out the snatch strap. He loops it over the towball and while i start saying why it is bd anther wave washes up the side of my beloved............................................. Lets go now i say!!!
Another never mentioned recovery point My towbar has like a double tonge where the towball shaft gos between ---- Far stronger than any reciever hitch pin. All I do is slot a shackle around it
AnswerID: 235457

Reply By: Member - Davoe (Nullagine) - Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:50

Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:50
Hey v8
if your not up to much this evening I should be able to find my way to Fremantle with the Ms navman
short notice so if it isn convnient thats fine
if your up for a visit TXT me on 041804057
AnswerID: 235503

Follow Up By: Member - Davoe (Nullagine) - Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:51

Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:51
damn keyboard 0418904057
0
FollowupID: 496634

Reply By: Member - Duncs - Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 12:42

Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 12:42
Wow V8 you got some input on this one.

I haven't got time to read it all now so this may have been said.

The biggest problem with banning towbar recoveries is enforcement.

When was the last time you got bogged and had the coppers roll by???

Most of the time when I get stuck I am well and truly on my own and remain that way until after I have recovered the vehicle. I love my shovel and my jack.

Duncs
AnswerID: 235516

Follow Up By: macka2 - Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 14:08

Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 14:08
Okay if some wants their Hayman Resse set up without tow ball Their risk. I 'm for rated recovery points but lets not ban everything
0
FollowupID: 496667

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 14:35

Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 14:35
Wasn't advocating it, just some food for thought.

It's D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F. for me when out bush;-)))
0
FollowupID: 496672

Follow Up By: Oldsquizzy (Kununurra) - Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 15:48

Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 15:48
Now if you could hit a bush turkey with a flying towball...mhhhh....now there is some food
0
FollowupID: 496695

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 15:56

Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 15:56
But wouldn't the turkeys be 'busted'?
0
FollowupID: 496697

Follow Up By: Oldsquizzy (Kununurra) - Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 18:40

Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 18:40
busted , basted, who cares still be nice
0
FollowupID: 496735

Reply By: G.T. - Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 17:20

Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 17:20
I read an article in 4 x 4 Australia re snatch strap loads . They had a strain gauge attached to the snatching vehicle and to the best of my memory they did not reach a 2 ton or tonne load. Given the stretch of the strap I think that the load would be put onto the snatching vehicle in a more gradual manner, not all at once.
Given that a 2 tonne caravan ( in theory ) is required to mount a kerb from standstill ie the wheels are right next to the kerb ,the strain on the vehicle`s tow bar would be equal or more than a snatch strap recovering a vehicle and it would be a more sudden load placed on the tow bar.
Am I on the right track or not? I get my copies of 4x4 Aust from the library so I can`t say which issue it was but someone out there will remember it and may wish to comment on it. Regards G.T.

AnswerID: 235558

Sponsored Links