Diesel / LPG Mix
Submitted: Friday, May 04, 2007 at 09:18
ThreadID:
45079
Views:
5061
Replies:
11
FollowUps:
12
This Thread has been Archived
The Landy
Does anyone have a set-up where they are using a diesel/lpg mix and what sort of improvements, both in tewrms of consumption and power (if any).
Thanks
Reply By: Member - Doug T (W.A) - Friday, May 04, 2007 at 09:38
Friday, May 04, 2007 at 09:38
Quite honestly mate I reackon it would be waste of money, would take years to recoup the outlay, and you can be assured if too many people go gas the price WILL go up , then there is the lost space taken up by a gas tank, and the risk of it exploding ,
Doug
AnswerID:
237841
Reply By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Friday, May 04, 2007 at 10:52
Friday, May 04, 2007 at 10:52
Despite what Doug says, I believe it's worth a decent look.
I have some (small amount) of experience I can lend to the discussion.
Firstly, my newish (to me) truck has LPG injenction and has had this since April 2001 (it was built in October 2000 and converted from a 4.2TD to a 6.5 V8 Chev Diesel in November 2000). So, from that perspective alone, the fact that the vehicle has done about 190,000klm and the LPG hasn't "blown up"....nor has the engine..... it's gotta be a fair indication.
Secondly, power-wise...... I have no hard and fast dyno figures etc. In my case too, the 6.5 chevvy has a goodly portion of torque and reasonable power. Switching on the LPG switch gives a small, but noticeable, boost. However, I have a mate who just had his 4.2TD Patrol converted (using CURRENT technology, unlike my truck's old-fashioned version). The difference in THAT vehicle is nothing short of astounding!!! I drove it for a short distance with the gas off, and then with it on. Being another bloke's truck, there was no way I was gunna drive it like I stole it ( as the was sitting beside me). However, I then had the chance to go as passenger while HE drove it like he stole it!!! Man; it goes better than my 6.5 v8.
Thirdly, fuel economy wise..... I have another mate who also has a 4.2TD Patrol. We both tow the same brand of camper trailer and I reckon my rig would be a few hundred kilo's heavier than his. On a recent trip from here (Kadina) to
Woomera, then across to
Farina,
Marree,
Oodnadatta,
Dalhousie Springs,
Chambers Pillar,
Alice Springs, Ayers
Rock, then back
home down the blacktop.......I used less fuel (combined cost of LPG and diesel) than he used straight diesel in his 4.2TD. Probably not a fair comparo because the 6.5 revs less at 100k/h due to 35" tyres. Typically I was doing 2000rpm while he was doing 2250rpm at the same speed.
So, there's a few points to think about.
AnswerID:
237850
Follow Up By: The Landy - Friday, May 04, 2007 at 11:50
Friday, May 04, 2007 at 11:50
Hi Roachie
My interest lies in extracting the best possible range for this vehicle as we are setting it up for long-range touring. I am about to order a 70 litre auxiliary fuel tank which will give me 120+70+40(jerry cans) for a total capacity of 230 litres and a range in the region of 1800 klms, which covers almost everything that I will need to do.
The decision process now revolves around whether I can extract the same endurance by installing an LPG system to mix the fuels instead of the auxiliary tank. Working on 160 litres I need to improve fuel efficiency from 12.5klms per 100 to 8.7klms per 100 on average looking at it from a usage perspective only. Clearly there is power along with cost improvements that could sway the decision.
From an installation perspective; I get a rebate on the LPG that brings it back to an acceptable cost versus the auxiliary fuel tank after installation.
Thanks for your thoughts.
FollowupID:
498959
Follow Up By: Trevor R (QLD) - Wednesday, May 16, 2007 at 20:39
Wednesday, May 16, 2007 at 20:39
Roachie,
Can I gather from your response here, when talking about the gassed 4.2 (and I quote) "Man; it goes better than my 6.5 v8" that a 4.2 with a promoted figure of 20-30% increase in torque and power (as the gassed option does) is a better result than a 6.5 conversion?
I understand if you are towing things may differ, but for driving it like you stole it you would be better off in the gassed 4.2? Plenty of 4.2's running around with bigger % increases in torque and power than 30% also, so where do these leave the 6.5 I wonder.
( I only hope Bilbo is reading this post)
Thanks for your input and regards as always.
Trevor.
FollowupID:
501373
Follow Up By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Wednesday, May 16, 2007 at 21:22
Wednesday, May 16, 2007 at 21:22
G'day Trevor,
It may be peculiar to my Chev, but I have not found out how to "drive it like I stole it". It is such a "lazy" motor, I find I don't need to (or want) flog the guts out of it. Maybe I'm just getting old.
It also may not be a fair comparison that I have done either. My 6.5 is HEAVY; REAL HEAVY......and it's wearing size 35 boots. The 4.2TD+LPG that I drove was pretty much bog stock as far as extra goodies goes; alloy bar and towbar...plus still running 32" rubber. But, it certainly got up and boogied when the owner gave it some berries with me in the passenger's
seat.
I still wouldn't trade vehicles with him........I love my Chev!!!! It just does everything I want; soooooo easily.
Looking forward to seeing you in July mate
Cheers
Roachie
FollowupID:
501385
Reply By: traveller2 - Friday, May 04, 2007 at 11:02
Friday, May 04, 2007 at 11:02
My concern would be the longevity/reliability of the engine, you get nothing for nothing there is always a consequence of pulling more power out of an engine.
These modern small turbo intercooled engines are already running at very high outputs for their cubic capacity so any attempts to extract further power may overload cooling, lubrication and other systems.
Given that some have already shown they will last no longer than a petrol engine (if that long in some cases), are very fussy on fuel quality, (mostly because OEM filters may not be up to the task) and most owners turn their vehicles over on relatively low mileage/age basis most will not realise any cost savings.
The investment is usually pretty good for the second and subsequent owners though as in Roachies case.
AnswerID:
237852
Follow Up By: PK Eildon (VIC) - Saturday, May 05, 2007 at 11:24
Saturday, May 05, 2007 at 11:24
Oh ye of little faith
"power may overload cooling, lubrication and other systems"
Had mine on Patrol 4.2 TD for over 12 months. EGT lower with gas, no increase in coolant temps. Diesel knock eliminated at speed, engine smooth and quiet. Engine oil cleaner due to little carbon & particulate matter. Engine internals clean with no build ups. 20% more HP, 20% more torque, torque build at 1500rpm, 20-25% less diesel use.
No modifications to motor, you just end up getting more response for less accelerator pressure.
don't know, but maybe, just maybe motor will last longer.
PK :)
FollowupID:
499164
Reply By: obee - Friday, May 04, 2007 at 12:47
Friday, May 04, 2007 at 12:47
Fact is government policy is to bring the tax up on gas slowly until it is same as on petrol. So I read anyway.
Owen
AnswerID:
237860
Follow Up By: Dallas from Team Green Autogas - Friday, May 04, 2007 at 22:01
Friday, May 04, 2007 at 22:01
hey Obee,
Yeah excise is going on lpg. Starts in 2011 & finishes in 2015. The excise is 12.5c/ltr. Still seems pretty good when you consider that petrol goes up 10c overnite, imagine what it'll be 9yrs from now.
Dallas
FollowupID:
499095
Follow Up By: fisho64 - Saturday, May 05, 2007 at 00:25
Saturday, May 05, 2007 at 00:25
have to agree with you Dallas, even though gas is spruiked as being the "clean green alternative", its not much good without a road to use it on and if only petrol and diesel pays for it and there are more and more LPG rigs on the road, it is obvious what will happen. To slowly ramp up to only 30% of the excise on ULP/Diesel seems a pretty fair outcome for a fuel that is changing from "alternative" to "mainstream"?
FollowupID:
499122
Reply By: whyallacookie - Friday, May 04, 2007 at 13:50
Friday, May 04, 2007 at 13:50
Landy, ust a thought I am fairly sure on the Diesel Gas Australia website (or someone similar) they have actually done the conversion on a 300Tdi that might help you a bit. (Keeping in mind of course it is within their interests to quote the best case!
AnswerID:
237865
Follow Up By: The Landy - Friday, May 04, 2007 at 13:59
Friday, May 04, 2007 at 13:59
Thanks. I did see that.
FollowupID:
498983
Reply By: RovingOz (QLD) - Friday, May 04, 2007 at 18:50
Friday, May 04, 2007 at 18:50
Have a guy camped beside us right now with a 105 landcruiser who has had it done.
Says it is an improvement power wise but not as much as he wanted. Good for the fuel economy. Says if he runs it without the gas it is SLOWWW..... Towing a KK camper.
Cost him $3000 with $600 rebate. He missed out on the $2000 rebate by a month. But of course the price has gone up now by about $1000, funny that.
AnswerID:
237923
Reply By: Member - DOZER- Friday, May 04, 2007 at 19:34
Friday, May 04, 2007 at 19:34
The other point to mention is that usually a small gas tank is installed because gas is only added ontop of the diesel, so not much is used or consumed.... To go through 70 litres of gas on such a conversion may take 400 litres of diesel....Roachy might be able to give you comparison figures on amounts....from what ive picked up listening in, the gas system works alot better on direct injection diesels than it does on indirect...and i would be doing this conversion if you intend to keep your limo...
Andrew
AnswerID:
237929
Follow Up By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Friday, May 04, 2007 at 20:40
Friday, May 04, 2007 at 20:40
Yeh, not REAL sure what the ratio of LPG to diesel is....I don't always drive with the LPG on.
On our recent trip, I topped up the diesel & LPG at Port Orguttta. We went via
Woomera,
Roxby Downs,
Andamooka,
Farina,
Marree and I filled the diesel at
Oodnadatta. Still had a little bit of LPG when we got to Alice, but I went to fill up with Diesel on the morning we were leaving, the servo's LPG bowser wasn't working. So we went southwards and I filled up the LPG at
Erldunda (took 69 litres in what I thought was a 60 litre tank!!!). That lasted me all the way to Ayers Rock, back to the Stuart and then all the way to Pt Orgutta again. Meanwhile I refilled the diesel at
Kulgera too.
FollowupID:
499056
Reply By: Wayne (NSW) - Friday, May 04, 2007 at 19:46
Friday, May 04, 2007 at 19:46
Baz,
There is a place near Penrith (Kingswood) that does the gas installation for diesels.
Might be worth a word with them. Can't find the phone number just know but I will keep looking.
Wayne
AnswerID:
237933
Follow Up By: The Landy - Monday, May 07, 2007 at 09:59
Monday, May 07, 2007 at 09:59
Hi Wayne........thanks I have spoken to them. They suggested about a 20% improvement in fuel consumption. Not to be sniffed at, however....
160 litres diesel + LPG (1,280 klm range @ 12.5/100), or
230 litres diesel, no LPG (1,840 klm range @ 12.5/100)
The way I am looking at this, putting aside the increase in power and potential cost savings, is that I need to extract an extra 560 klm out of the current diesel capacity with the addition of LPG otherwise the range is compromised versus what I can achieve from the additional diesel tank. That would require an improvement in consumption from 12.5/100 to 8.7/100; from research to date I think I would be lucky to get a 20% improvement.
FollowupID:
499448
Reply By: D-Jack - Friday, May 04, 2007 at 20:01
Friday, May 04, 2007 at 20:01
My 3.0 TD Jackaroo was done about 3 weeks ago, limited fuel economy results as such. But to date, power up about 20% (guess), torque up, revs effortlessly up to red line now. Fuel economy has risen from 12.5l/100kms to 10l/100 kms, roughly 23%, gas usage is up a little at the moment but hasn't been checked since installation (requires a check after consumption tests) but is suppposed to be set at 20Lgas to 80L diesel for max power:economy gains. I think defenders have an 85L tank, so you will need about 20L. Results on abovementioned website were much better than these for the Defender TD - more like 30% plus gains, may indicate they have a low diesel combustion rate unmodified in standard form, or the results may have been tweaked with other mods (like the 4.2TD on the site - quite useless results given they have added larger intercooler etc).
Im not too fussed about longevity - surely an engine can withstand pressures on it brought about by close to 100% burn rate in the combustion chamber. You could do more damage by continually flogging a non-LPG engine. I need less right foot now to go the same speed/accellaration rate, the engine doesn't work as hard, tows easier etc.
Performance is notably increased. I have worked out at current prices you will save about 15-17% on total fuel cost (a lot more at the moment with diesel at 129c/L plus), get an extra 200km range or there abouts, reduce exhaust emissions substantially, run with lower internal temperatures (good for engine), cleaner longer lasting oil. All good if you ask me.
Some people spend $2000 on a chip/exhaust at least. LPG gives great performance results and saves you money in fuel later. And if you run out of LPG, you just keep running on diesel!
Performance is easy to guage with a dyno - you start with gas turned off, then with gas on. Try sprints to 100 km/h on the flat, or max speed reached up a
hill to a certain point to compare. You will feel a most definite increase in power and torque anyway.
Good luck with your decision. I know I'm glad I've made the change.
D-Jack
AnswerID:
237939
Reply By: Dallas from Team Green Autogas - Friday, May 04, 2007 at 21:49
Friday, May 04, 2007 at 21:49
G'day Landy,
We did a Landy just recently, 97' 3Ltr Tdi. We gained 24% at the rear wheels & haven't had much
feedback yet in the way of economy.
We were able to get 26Ltrs usable under the vehicle with an exhaust mod, giving him a range of roughly 850K's out of the LPG.
Big difference in torque as well. The difference in drivability is really noticable. We got 41% gains out of a 3Ltr Turbo Diesel GU, 33% gains on our own 2.2Ltr Diesel Mazda Van, 20% Gains out of a HJ60 Turbo Diesel, & the list goes on.
At the end of the day Diesel Gas is all about improving the efficiency of the diesel burn. If you consider the LPG as an accelerant, when added to the cylinder it enables you to burn more of the diesel than you normally would, giving you extra energy from that fuel meaning to do 100klm/h down the highway you don't need to put so much in, = lift your foot = less diesel used =$$$ in your pocket.
We had to fit a crank angle sensor plus a throttle position sensor. A pretty involved conversion.
Good results at the end of the day.
AnswerID:
237971
Follow Up By: Dallas from Team Green Autogas - Friday, May 04, 2007 at 21:57
Friday, May 04, 2007 at 21:57
Also Landy, LPG is a controlled flame front & reduces the "diesel knock" , reducing the impacting motion on your bearings. You'll be putting less diesel thru so you'll also be keeping your engine oil cleaner for longer, improving engine life. You don't get the same problems with valves as you do with petrol as you are continuously running a wet lubricant fuel so there's plenty of lubrication for the valves. LPG is introduced thru a set of LPG Injectors as a cold vapour, cooling & condensing the intake air.
Benefits left, right & centre
FollowupID:
499091
Follow Up By: The Landy - Monday, May 07, 2007 at 10:02
Monday, May 07, 2007 at 10:02
Thanks. My thoughts are along the following lines........
My interest is simply in increasing the range, the cost of fuel is less of a concern. The debate for me is what extracts the best range....
160 litres diesel + LPG (1,280 klm range @ 12.5/100), or
230 litres diesel, no LPG (1,840 klm range @ 12.5/100)
The way I am looking at this, putting aside the increase in power and potential cost savings, is that I need to extract an extra 560 klm out of the current diesel capacity with the addition of LPG otherwise the range is compromised versus what I can achieve from the additional diesel tank. That would require an improvement in consumption from 12.5/100 to 8.7/100; from research to date I think I would be lucky to get a 20% improvement.
FollowupID:
499449
Reply By: sjp - Saturday, May 05, 2007 at 07:05
Saturday, May 05, 2007 at 07:05
ive got the dieselgas system on my 105 l/cruisr,but now iam thinking of trading in the car ,this part is going to be interesting,because most dealers only want a unmodified car and others have never heard of gas in a diesel,so after spending 4 grand iam going to find out if i have actually devalued it,the other option is to take the kit off and try to sell it separately(any takers)
AnswerID:
238022
Follow Up By: Dallas from Team Green Autogas - Saturday, May 05, 2007 at 17:53
Saturday, May 05, 2007 at 17:53
SJP,
Consider transfering it to your next rig???
If you get the dealer to understand that your rig goes better than any other that the customer will test drive that day PLUS yours will be cheaper to run than any other that the customer will test drive that day he'd have to snap it up you would think. Even gives him something the other dealers don't have.
Shall be interesting to see how it turns out in the real world.
Regards
Dallas
FollowupID:
499211