2004 Rodeo LPG
Submitted: Thursday, Dec 27, 2007 at 00:37
ThreadID:
52878
Views:
8463
Replies:
5
FollowUps:
3
This Thread has been Archived
Rodeo-jayco
Hi
forum, just wondering if anyone might have had any experience with an LPG conversion on a 2004 RA Rodeo 3.5L V6.
Who did the conversion?, did you suffer a power loss for towing?...what sort of consumption figures are you getting?........any comments at all appreciated.
Regards,
Paul
Brisbane.
Reply By: madfisher - Thursday, Dec 27, 2007 at 08:25
Thursday, Dec 27, 2007 at 08:25
Paul I have a 3.5 Jack with the same motor, and the info I got was the motors do not take to gas very
well, and you willend up spending thousands on head repairs.
Cheers Pete
AnswerID:
278578
Reply By: Member - Shane L - QLD - Thursday, Dec 27, 2007 at 08:45
Thursday, Dec 27, 2007 at 08:45
Hi,
I did the conversion on my 2004 RA Rodeo 2WD Dual Cab V6, vapor injection - cost 4k no noticable loss of power, still thirsty but alot cheaper to run. I asked Holden about it before I did it and they only recomended 1 system which is the 1 I had installed (sorry can't remember brand). This was done before moving up here to QLD, I no longer have ute (traded it for 4x4 Diesel)
I had no complaints with the ute or the gas in 2 1/2 years and I had the conversion done at 10000 km. Still had plenty of power on LPG or petrol - Range was about 350 km per 50 odd litres and only downside was having to find somwhere for the spare wheel as it took up alot of room in the back, when you use it for work (Electricial Contractor) it was a pain. Ended up with a couple of roof bars over canopy and a roof basket for the spare to live in.
regards
Shane
AnswerID:
278580
Reply By: Gerhardp1 - Thursday, Dec 27, 2007 at 13:13
Thursday, Dec 27, 2007 at 13:13
Hi Paul,
Do yourself a favour and DON'T put the 3.5 on gas.
You will have cracked head problems, guaranteed. They can be minimised if you were to fit a gas system that runs on petrol until the engine is at FULL operating temperature before it switches over, but since the 3.5 is at its thirstiest during the warmup you will reduce your potential savings. And the heads will still crack eventually.
A friend's rodeo 3.2 V6 on gas recently required a replacement head on one side, $3800. It's highly likely the other head will soon go as
well, so his gas conversion was a total waste of money, even though he felt good every time he left the service station.
AnswerID:
278601
Reply By: Rodeo-jayco - Thursday, Dec 27, 2007 at 15:56
Thursday, Dec 27, 2007 at 15:56
Wow.......thanks everyone...I guess!!..wished I had of kept my Jeep now!!
AnswerID:
278613
Follow Up By: Gerhardp1 - Thursday, Dec 27, 2007 at 19:40
Thursday, Dec 27, 2007 at 19:40
Huh ????
Wash out your mouth :))
That sort of blasphemy is not allowed in public :)
FollowupID:
542674
Follow Up By: Rodeo-jayco - Thursday, Dec 27, 2007 at 21:56
Thursday, Dec 27, 2007 at 21:56
Ok...
well I traded in a perfectly good 12 year old Cherokee simply because it was 12 years old....that old Jeep took us into, and out of, some pretty scary
places around this country and never missed a beat once.
I wanted to reduce my traveling costs so prior to buying this Rodeo I found a number of
well established LPG installers who have kits to suit.. it appears now that they are interested only in getting their money and have little care for engine longevity...one better known
Brisbane installer claims that their sequential injection system and upper cylinder lubricant metering gear removes previous worries regarding engine head problems.
This is the only system approved by GMH but they do not guarantee there will be no issues...the RACQ tell me that gas is great, for bbbq's!.
Thanks all who have responded anyway.
FollowupID:
542698
Follow Up By: Gerhardp1 - Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 08:03
Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 08:03
If it's any consolation, petrol is the only thing you will have to feed it. I have the same engine in the Monterey and maintenance expenses have been very small.
There is a Unichip available that supposedly cuts the fuel use dramatically without loss of power, you may wish to investigate that option rather than the gas. My guess is that the fuel map in the ECU for this engine is designed for engine longevity rather than economy - in the Jack, fuel economy is the same whether cruising at 80 or 110, and barely affected when towing a 1000kg trailer - most likely the Rodeo is the same except for maybe pulling higher revs at 100k than the Jack.
FollowupID:
542745
Reply By: Rodeo-jayco - Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 10:52
Friday, Dec 28, 2007 at 10:52
Thanks for your response...at this point in time, having only had the Rodeo a short time, I have not run enough distance to get any meaningful consumption figures but it does appear to be very thirsty...compared to the 4litre 'old tech' Jeep engine.
Paul
Brisbane.
AnswerID:
278712