Rego time again, Just how safe are vehicles in states that don't require a inspe
Submitted: Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 20:57
ThreadID:
53088
Views:
2871
Replies:
16
FollowUps:
17
This Thread has been Archived
Member - Axle
Rego inspection time again, i always keep a eye on things around the supension , steering , brake area for my own piece of mind!, but for people that have no interest in the mech side of their car, there must be some horrible things getting along the road in states where no inspection is required . A lot of dodgy things go on here in NSW, but they do try.& keep vechicles in some sort of reasonable state, especially older ones.
Cheers Axle.
Reply By: Member - Brummiepete - Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 22:56
Thursday, Jan 03, 2008 at 22:56
Hi Axle .I must admit living in WA is great for me because i havent got to go over the pits every year but i am fastidious with the maintenance on my vehicle ,i can see the merits of having a yearly
check and just to get rid of all the old bombs here they could just do a shock absorber ,tyre and steering
check and that would be enough .
I wouldnt like to see WA go the way of the uk with its MOT system which is getting increasingly more difficult to pass each year as they bring in more stringent measures to keep vehicles off the road ,and lets face it any kind of
test is really only valid for the day of passing it means nothing a month or a week down the line .
AnswerID:
279641
Reply By: Member - Oldbaz. NSW. - Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 08:25
Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 08:25
I agree with you Axle, an annual inspection should be compulsory
everywhere. Another good reason to do away with State Governments. Dont see WA cars much but the wrecks driving
around Qld demonstrate that people wont self regulate on this
issue. I suppose the other end of the spectrum is having your
car crushed at 3 years old as occurs in some Asian locations such
as Singapore. As a miserable old fart I deem it my right to run old cars but am happy to have them inspected.....oldbaz.
AnswerID:
279698
Reply By: ross - Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 11:39
Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 11:39
I cant rermember the last time a car with poor maintenance was the blame for a crash.
When you look at the statisitical evidence of car accidents in WA ,unroadworthy vehicles are way down the list. Something like 1% and not much different to states where they have mandatory testing.
If you do have yearly testing ,a hell of a lot can happen in that year to a vehicles road worthiness.
When I lived in Vic and had to have a car tested I found nothing but corruption.
Either people wanting back handers or mechanics trying to force me to buy their overpriced parts and tyres ect when they were not needed.
For those that see an
old car that looks a little untidy,how can you tell its unroadworthy just by looking at it.
Underneath the grungy exterior it maybe in perfect mechanical health.
States that want to improve safety on the roads should spend their money on catching the drunks,the sleepyheads and the speeders.
Not force people to take time off work to visit some dodgy garage and pay the govt for the privelege.
AnswerID:
279725
Reply By: Footloose - Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 12:44
Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 12:44
State vehicle inspection legislation adds another level of boo
rock raa see that is highly corruptable. There are far too many instances of "sorry mate, but you'll have to see the panel beater first(he's my brother)."
What if you're on a remote property? How the heck do you get your vehicles inspected, pay to fly an inspector out?
How do remote towns cope, do the police make an annual visit to all of them ?
I know that any policeman can defect my vehicle, and I can be stopped and inspected by mobile testing stations.
But they don't even exist on my radar.
I am responsible for not only the lives of my passengers, but also those of others on the roads. It's up to ME to take responsibility for my vehicle's roadworthyness.
AnswerID:
279740